back_to_rankings
Charles Alexandre Mpome Moukouri Douala portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Charles Alexandre Mpome Moukouri Douala

Point Guard · CMR · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

198 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

0.0 stocksDefensive activity · 15th event percentile

1.3 RPGRebounding · 14th event percentile

20.4
HESI v2.1
#110
of 138
40%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #110 of 138 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

20.4

Event performance

21st event percentile

PI

27.9

Prospect index

21st event percentile

ORtg

45.8

Points / 100 poss.

17th event percentile

DRtg

78.6

Lower is better

47th event percentile

NRtg

-32.9

Two-way margin

21st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 45.8 · 17th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 78.6 · Stop% 38.9% · Team DRtg 65.9

Sample context

4 games · 40 minutes · 40% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

0.0 stocks15th event percentile

Rebounding

1.3 RPG14th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

20.4

21st event percentile

Prospect index

27.9

21st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

45.8

17th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

78.6

47th event percentile

Two-way margin

-32.9

21st event percentile

Stop percentage

38.9%

6th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

0.8 PPG

12th event percentile

Creation

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Rebounding

1.3 RPG

14th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.0 stocks

15th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

15.4% TS

11th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 21st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 45.8 ORtg and 78.6 DRtg, producing a -32.9 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are creation, defensive stops, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Creation

    0.0 APG

    6th event percentile

    Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

  2. Defensive stops

    38.9% Stop%

    6th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    15.4% TS

    11th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

45.8

17th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

0.8 PPG

12th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

15.4%

11th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

0.0%

4th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

0.0%

4th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

1.0 attempts per game

Free throws

75.0%

84th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

22.3%

18th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

78.6

47th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

65.9

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-12.8

2nd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

38.9%

6th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.0 STL+BLK

15th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

6.3

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-32.9

21st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-16.3

21st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

20.4

21st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

27.9

21st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-2.3%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.3 RPG

14th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

4

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

39.5

context

9.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

39.7%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#110

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

493.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

4

GP

0.8

PPG

1.3

RPG

0.0

APG

#110

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

4

GP

0.8

PPG

1.3

RPG

0.0

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Timothee Ndohoudou portrait#108

    Timothee Ndohoudou

    Small Forward · Chad

    8.3 PPG 5.0 RPG 4.3 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

0.8

PPG

1.3

RPG

0.0

APG

0.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

0%

3P%

15%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

4 GP · event rank #110

//quick_read

The line at a glance

0.8

PPG

1.3

RPG

0.0

APG

0.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

15%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

0.8

P12

Playmaking

0.0

P6

Rebounding

1.3

P14

True shooting

15%

P11

Two-way impact

-32.9

P21

Stops

39%

P6

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

0%

0 made / 8 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 4 attempts

FT

Free throws

75%

3 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

50% of attempts from three

●2PA 4●3PA 4

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

3

PTS

0.8 / game

0–8

FGM–FGA

0–4

3PM–3PA

3–4

FTM–FTA

creation

0

AST

0.0 / game

1

TOV

0.3 / game

0.00×

AST:TOV

6

FD

rebounding

5

REB

1.3 / game

3

OREB

2

DREB

1.3

REB/G

defense

0

STL

0.0 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

5

PF

0

STL+BLK

0.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

20.4

HESI

27.9

PI

45.8

ORtg

78.6

DRtg

-32.9

NRtg

-16.3

Stable NRtg

39%

Stop%

22%

Floor%

0%

eFG%

-2%

PIE

65.9

Team DRtg

-12.8

Def. lift

sample_context

4 games40 minutes9.9 min/game40% sample weightrank #110 of 138

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.