Hesi Sports Consulting
back_to_rankings
Timothee Ndohoudou portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Timothee Ndohoudou

Small Forward · CHA · b. 2008

//measurables

195 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalCreator4.3 APG · 96th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

4.3 APGCreation · 96th event percentile

8.3 PPGScoring load · 76th event percentile

21.9
HESI v2.1
#108
of 138
77%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #108 of 138 · High confidence

HESI v2.1

HESI

21.9

Event performance

22nd event percentile

PI

29.0

Prospect index

22nd event percentile

ORtg

70.2

Points / 100 poss.

42nd event percentile

DRtg

88.9

Lower is better

19th event percentile

NRtg

-18.8

Two-way margin

35th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 70.2 · 42nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 88.9 · Stop% 50.7% · Team DRtg 84.8

Sample context

6 games · 206 minutes · 77% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

4.3 APG96th event percentile

Scoring load

8.3 PPG76th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  2. 02

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

21.9

22nd event percentile

Prospect index

29.0

22nd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

70.2

42nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

88.9

19th event percentile

Two-way margin

-18.8

35th event percentile

Stop percentage

50.7%

20th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

8.3 PPG

76th event percentile

Creation

4.3 APG

96th event percentile

Rebounding

5.0 RPG

69th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks

40th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

36.3% TS

49th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P96

    Creator

    4.3 APG · 96th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 22nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 70.2 ORtg and 88.9 DRtg, producing a -18.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring load, and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    4.3 APG

    96th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  2. Scoring load

    8.3 PPG

    76th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  3. Rebounding

    5.0 RPG

    69th event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive efficiency

    88.9 DRtg

    19th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

  2. Defensive stops

    50.7% Stop%

    20th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  3. Two-way margin

    -18.8 NRtg

    35th event percentile

    The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

70.2

42nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

8.3 PPG

76th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

36.3%

49th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

35.8%

56th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

28.3%

44th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

30.0%

context

5.0 attempts per game

Free throws

35.0%

21st event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

30.7%

37th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

4.3 APG

96th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

88.9

19th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

84.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.1

33rd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

50.7%

20th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.0 STL+BLK

40th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

42.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-18.8

35th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-15.7

22nd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

21.9

22nd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

29.0

22nd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

4.5%

60th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

5.0 RPG

69th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

205.6

context

34.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

77.4%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

High confidence

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#108

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

492.7

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

8.3

PPG

5.0

RPG

4.3

APG

#108

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4

Regional · 2026

#22

RANK

57

FIELD

63%

PERCENTILE

9.0

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#108/138view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.3

PPG

5.0

RPG

4.3

APG

3.3

TOV/G

1.5

3PM/G

36%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.3

P76

Playmaking

4.3

P96

Rebounding

5.0

P69

True shooting

36%

P49

Two-way impact

-18.8

P35

Stops

51%

P20

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

28%

17 made / 60 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

30%

9 made / 30 attempts

FT

Free throws

35%

7 made / 20 attempts

Shot selection

50% of attempts from three

●2PA 30●3PA 30

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

50

PTS

8.3 / game

17–60

FGM–FGA

9–30

3PM–3PA

7–20

FTM–FTA

creation

26

AST

4.3 / game

20

TOV

3.3 / game

1.30×

AST:TOV

17

FD

rebounding

30

REB

5.0 / game

5

OREB

25

DREB

5.0

REB/G

defense

6

STL

1.0 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

14

PF

6

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

21.9

HESI

29.0

PI

70.2

ORtg

88.9

DRtg

-18.8

NRtg

-15.7

Stable NRtg

51%

Stop%

31%

Floor%

36%

eFG%

5%

PIE

84.8

Team DRtg

-4.1

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games206 minutes34.3 min/game77% sample weightrank #108 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4

Regional · 2026

#22/57view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

9.0

PPG

4.8

RPG

2.3

APG

3.2

TOV/G

2.0

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

9.0

P68

Playmaking

2.3

P84

Rebounding

4.8

P70

True shooting

43%

P63

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

29%

17 made / 58 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

33%

12 made / 36 attempts

FT

Free throws

67%

8 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

62% of attempts from three

●2PA 22●3PA 36

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

54

PTS

9.0 / game

17–58

FGM–FGA

12–36

3PM–3PA

8–12

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

19

TOV

3.2 / game

0.74×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

29

REB

4.8 / game

6

OREB

23

DREB

4.8

REB/G

defense

6

STL

1.0 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

12

PF

6

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

40%

eFG%

2%

PIE

sample_context

6 gamesrank #22 of 57
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.

rank_above · #107Mahamat Aka OusmaneSF · Chad

//current_rank

#108

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #109Emir Ben JaballahPG · Tunisia
more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Ismail Driouch portrait#106

    Ismail Driouch

    Morocco

    3.8 PPG 7.8 RPG 0.2 APG

  • Mahamat Aka Ousmane portrait#107

    Mahamat Aka Ousmane

    Small Forward · Chad

    8.2 PPG 3.8 RPG 1.0 APG

  • Emir Ben Jaballah portrait#109

    Emir Ben Jaballah

    Point Guard · Tunisia

    2.0 PPG 1.0 RPG 1.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

9.0

PPG

4.8

RPG

2.3

APG

1.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

—

3P%

43%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #108

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.3

PPG

5.0

RPG

4.3

APG

3.3

TOV/G

1.5

3PM/G

36%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.3

P76

Playmaking

4.3

P96

Rebounding

5.0

P69

True shooting

36%

P49

Two-way impact

-18.8

P35

Stops

51%

P20

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

28%

17 made / 60 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

30%

9 made / 30 attempts

FT

Free throws

35%

7 made / 20 attempts

Shot selection

50% of attempts from three

●2PA 30●3PA 30

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

50

PTS

8.3 / game

17–60

FGM–FGA

9–30

3PM–3PA

7–20

FTM–FTA

creation

26

AST

4.3 / game

20

TOV

3.3 / game

1.30×

AST:TOV

17

FD

rebounding

30

REB

5.0 / game

5

OREB

25

DREB

5.0

REB/G

defense

6

STL

1.0 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

14

PF

6

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

21.9

HESI

29.0

PI

70.2

ORtg

88.9

DRtg

-18.8

NRtg

-15.7

Stable NRtg

51%

Stop%

31%

Floor%

36%

eFG%

5%

PIE

84.8

Team DRtg

-4.1

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games206 minutes34.3 min/game77% sample weightrank #108 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026

6 GP · event rank #22

//quick_read

The line at a glance

9.0

PPG

4.8

RPG

2.3

APG

3.2

TOV/G

2.0

3PM/G

43%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

9.0

P68

Playmaking

2.3

P84

Rebounding

4.8

P70

True shooting

43%

P63

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

29%

17 made / 58 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

33%

12 made / 36 attempts

FT

Free throws

67%

8 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

62% of attempts from three

●2PA 22●3PA 36

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

54

PTS

9.0 / game

17–58

FGM–FGA

12–36

3PM–3PA

8–12

FTM–FTA

creation

14

AST

2.3 / game

19

TOV

3.2 / game

0.74×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

29

REB

4.8 / game

6

OREB

23

DREB

4.8

REB/G

defense

6

STL

1.0 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

12

PF

6

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

40%

eFG%

2%

PIE

sample_context

6 gamesrank #22 of 57

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.