ORtg
63.6
34th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Mahamat Aka Ousmane
Small Forward · CHA · b. 2008
//measurables
190 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load-led profile
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
8.2 PPGScoring load · 74th event percentile
2.5 stocksDefensive activity · 59th event percentile
- 22.6
- HESI v2.1
- #107
- of 138
- 70%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #107 of 138 · Established
HESI
22.6
Event performance
23rd event percentile
PI
29.6
Prospect index
23rd event percentile
ORtg
63.6
Points / 100 poss.
34th event percentile
DRtg
83.4
Lower is better
35th event percentile
NRtg
-19.9
Two-way margin
33rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 63.6 · 34th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 83.4 · Stop% 63.6% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
6 games · 142 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
8.2 PPG74th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.5 stocks59th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
22.6
23rd event percentile
Prospect index
29.6
23rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
63.6
34th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
83.4
35th event percentile
Two-way margin
-19.9
33rd event percentile
Stop percentage
63.6%
61st event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
8.2 PPG
74th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
3.8 RPG
54th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.5 stocks
59th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
33.9% TS
38th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 23rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 63.6 ORtg and 83.4 DRtg, producing a -19.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is scoring load. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 74th event percentile
Scoring load
8.2 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 33rd event percentile
Two-way margin
-19.9 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 34th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
63.6 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 35th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
83.4 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
8.2 PPG
74th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
33.9%
38th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
32.5%
46th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
27.0%
42nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
30.4%
context3.8 attempts per game
Free throws
38.1%
25th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
29.0%
28th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
83.4
35th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+1.4
71st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
63.6%
61st event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.5 STL+BLK
59th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
37.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-19.9
33rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-15.6
23rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
22.6
23rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
29.6
23rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-1.3%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.8 RPG
54th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
141.9
context23.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#107
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
492.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
8.2
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.0
APG
#107
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#21
RANK
57
FIELD
64%
PERCENTILE
13.8
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#107/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.2
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.0
APG
2.8
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.2
P74
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
3.8
P54
True shooting
34%
P38
Two-way impact
-19.9
P33
Stops
64%
P61
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
17 made / 63 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
7 made / 23 attempts
FT
Free throws
38%
8 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
37% of attempts from three
●2PA 40●3PA 23
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
49
PTS
8.2 / game
17–63
FGM–FGA
7–23
3PM–3PA
8–21
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
17
TOV
2.8 / game
0.35×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
13
OREB
10
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
16
PF
15
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
22.6
HESI
29.6
PI
63.6
ORtg
83.4
DRtg
-19.9
NRtg
-15.6
Stable NRtg
64%
Stop%
29%
Floor%
33%
eFG%
-1%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+1.4
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#21/57view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
13.8
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
13.8
P85
Playmaking
2.0
P77
Rebounding
5.0
P73
True shooting
37%
P42
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
28%
28 made / 100 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
9 made / 32 attempts
FT
Free throws
62%
18 made / 29 attempts
Shot selection
32% of attempts from three
●2PA 68●3PA 32
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
83
PTS
13.8 / game
28–100
FGM–FGA
9–32
3PM–3PA
18–29
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
0.86×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
30
REB
5.0 / game
18
OREB
12
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
17
STL
2.8 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
17
PF
19
STL+BLK
3.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
33%
eFG%
2%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #106Ismail DriouchMoroccorank_below · #108Timothee NdohoudouSF · Chad
//current_rank
#107
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#105
#106
#108
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
13.8
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.0
APG
2.8
SPG
0.3
BPG
—
3P%
37%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #107
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.2
PPG
3.8
RPG
1.0
APG
2.8
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
34%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.2
P74
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
3.8
P54
True shooting
34%
P38
Two-way impact
-19.9
P33
Stops
64%
P61
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
17 made / 63 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
7 made / 23 attempts
FT
Free throws
38%
8 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
37% of attempts from three
●2PA 40●3PA 23
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
49
PTS
8.2 / game
17–63
FGM–FGA
7–23
3PM–3PA
8–21
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.0 / game
17
TOV
2.8 / game
0.35×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
23
REB
3.8 / game
13
OREB
10
DREB
3.8
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
16
PF
15
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
22.6
HESI
29.6
PI
63.6
ORtg
83.4
DRtg
-19.9
NRtg
-15.6
Stable NRtg
64%
Stop%
29%
Floor%
33%
eFG%
-1%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
+1.4
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026
6 GP · event rank #21
//quick_read
The line at a glance
13.8
PPG
5.0
RPG
2.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
13.8
P85
Playmaking
2.0
P77
Rebounding
5.0
P73
True shooting
37%
P42
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
28%
28 made / 100 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
28%
9 made / 32 attempts
FT
Free throws
62%
18 made / 29 attempts
Shot selection
32% of attempts from three
●2PA 68●3PA 32
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
83
PTS
13.8 / game
28–100
FGM–FGA
9–32
3PM–3PA
18–29
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
0.86×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
30
REB
5.0 / game
18
OREB
12
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
17
STL
2.8 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
17
PF
19
STL+BLK
3.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
33%
eFG%
2%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.