Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Emir Ben Jaballah

Point Guard · TUN · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

189 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led profile

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.0 APGCreation · 51st event percentile

2.0 PPGScoring load · 26th event percentile

21.2
HESI v2.1: #109
of 138: 45%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #109 of 138 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

21.2

Event performance

21st event percentile

28.4

Prospect index

21st event percentile

ORtg

48.8

Points / 100 poss.

20th event percentile

DRtg

78.0

Lower is better

51st event percentile

NRtg

-29.2

Two-way margin

24th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 48.8 · 20th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 78.0 · Stop% 52.2% · Team DRtg 72.7

Sample context

6 games · 49 minutes · 45% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led profileevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

1.0 APG51st event percentile

Scoring load

2.0 PPG26th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

21.2

21st event percentile

Prospect index

28.4

21st event percentile

Offensive efficiency

48.8

20th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

78.0

51st event percentile

Two-way margin

-29.2

24th event percentile

Stop percentage

52.2%

25th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.0 PPG

26th event percentile

Creation

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Rebounding

1.0 RPG

9th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.3 stocks

23rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

27.6% TS

21st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 21st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 48.8 ORtg and 78.0 DRtg, producing a -29.2 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, offensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Rebounding
1.0 RPG
9th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
Offensive efficiency
48.8 ORtg
20th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Scoring efficiency
27.6% TS
21st event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

48.8

20th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.0 PPG

26th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

27.6%

21st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

22.5%

24th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

20.0%

22nd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

7.7%

context

2.2 attempts per game

Free throws

75.0%

84th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

22.1%

18th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

78.0

51st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

72.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-5.3

23rd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

52.2%

25th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.3 STL+BLK

23rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

10.1

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-29.2

24th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-16.0

21st event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

21.2

21st event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

28.4

21st event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-1.8%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.0 RPG

9th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

48.5

context

8.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

44.7%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#109

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

476.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

2.0

PPG

1.0

RPG

1.0

APG

#109

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#25

RANK

FIELD

27%

PERCENTILE

6.8

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#109/138Event board →

2.0

PPG

1.0

RPG

1.0

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#25/34Event board →

6.8

PPG

1.8

RPG

2.5

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #108Timothee NdohoudouSF · Chad

//current_rank

#109

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #110Charles Alexandre Mpome Moukouri DoualaPG · Cameroon

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#107
Mahamat Aka Ousmane
Small Forward · Chad
8.2 PPG 3.8 RPG 1.0 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6.8

PPG

1.8

RPG

2.5

APG

0.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

—

3P%

39%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #109

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.0

PPG

1.0

RPG

1.0

APG

1.8

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

28%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.0

P26

Playmaking

1.0

P51

Rebounding

1.0

True shooting

28%

P21

Two-way impact

-29.2

P24

Stops

52%

P25

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

20%

4 made / 20 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

1 made / 13 attempts

Free throws

75%

3 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

65% of attempts from three

●2PA 7●3PA 13

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

2.0 / game

4–20

FGM–FGA

1–13

3PM–3PA

3–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.0 / game

TOV

1.8 / game

0.55×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

1.0 / game

OREB

DREB

1.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.3 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

21.2

HESI

28.4

48.8

ORtg

78.0

DRtg

-29.2

NRtg

-16.0

Stable NRtg

52%

Stop%

22%

Floor%

23%

eFG%

-2%

PIE

72.7

Team DRtg

-5.3

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026

4 GP · event rank #25

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.8

PPG

1.8

RPG

2.5

APG

3.0

TOV/G

1.3

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.8

P71

Playmaking

2.5

P78

Rebounding

1.8

P13

True shooting

39%

P54

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

21%

6 made / 28 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

23%

5 made / 22 attempts

Free throws

67%

10 made / 15 attempts

Shot selection

79% of attempts from three

●2PA 6●3PA 22

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

6.8 / game

6–28

FGM–FGA

5–22

3PM–3PA

10–15

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.5 / game

TOV

3.0 / game

0.83×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

1.8 / game

OREB

DREB

1.8

REB/G

defense

STL

0.0 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

30%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.