ORtg
94.0
68th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
ITA · b. 2009
//measurables
185 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
11.7 RPGRebounding · 99th event percentile
7.1 PPGScoring load · 69th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #38 of 192 · Established
HESI
80.6
Event performance
80th event percentile
PI
79.0
Prospect index
80th event percentile
ORtg
94.0
Points / 100 poss.
68th event percentile
DRtg
75.3
Lower is better
76th event percentile
NRtg
+18.7
Two-way margin
79th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 94.0 · 68th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 75.3 · Stop% 85.2% · Team DRtg 86.3
Sample context
7 games · 158 minutes · 73% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Scoring load
Questions for film
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
80.6
80th event percentile
Prospect index
79.0
80th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
94.0
68th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
75.3
76th event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.7
79th event percentile
Stop percentage
85.2%
96th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
7.1 PPG
69th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
45th event percentile
Rebounding
11.7 RPG
99th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
63rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
43.5% TS
55th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
11.7 RPG · 100th event percentile
Defensive Impact
75.3 DRtg · 85% Stop% · 86th event percentile
Activity
11.7 RPG + 1.3 defensive plays/G · 75th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 80th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 94.0 ORtg and 75.3 DRtg, producing a +18.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive stops, and two-way margin.
Rebounding
11.7 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive stops
85.2% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Two-way margin
+18.7 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
94.0
68th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
7.1 PPG
69th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
43.5%
55th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
41.0%
61st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
40.0%
76th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
16.7%
context0.9 attempts per game
Free throws
52.9%
43rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
46.7%
80th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
45th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
75.3
76th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
86.3
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+11.0
97th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
85.2%
96th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
63rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
50.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+18.7
79th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+13.6
80th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
80.6
80th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
79.0
80th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
12.8%
93rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
11.7 RPG
99th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
158.3
context22.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
72.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#38
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
525.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
7.1
PPG
11.7
RPG
1.0
APG
#38
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
7.1
PPG
11.7
RPG
1.0
APG
1.1
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.1
P69
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
11.7
P100
True shooting
44%
P55
Two-way impact
+18.7
P79
Stops
85%
P96
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
40%
20 made / 50 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
9 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
12% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
50
PTS
7.1 / game
20–50
FGM–FGA
1–6
3PM–3PA
9–17
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.0 / game
8
TOV
1.1 / game
0.88×
AST:TOV
16
FD
rebounding
82
REB
11.7 / game
26
OREB
56
DREB
11.7
REB/G
defense
6
STL
0.9 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
16
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
80.6
HESI
79.0
PI
94.0
ORtg
75.3
DRtg
+18.7
NRtg
+13.6
Stable NRtg
85%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
13%
PIE
86.3
Team DRtg
+11.0
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
7.1
PPG
11.7
RPG
1.0
APG
0.9
SPG
0.4
BPG
17%
3P%
44%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #38
//quick_read
7.1
PPG
11.7
RPG
1.0
APG
1.1
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
44%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.1
P69
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
11.7
P100
True shooting
44%
P55
Two-way impact
+18.7
P79
Stops
85%
P96
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
40%
20 made / 50 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
1 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
53%
9 made / 17 attempts
Shot selection
12% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
50
PTS
7.1 / game
20–50
FGM–FGA
1–6
3PM–3PA
9–17
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.0 / game
8
TOV
1.1 / game
0.88×
AST:TOV
16
FD
rebounding
82
REB
11.7 / game
26
OREB
56
DREB
11.7
REB/G
defense
6
STL
0.9 / game
3
BLK
0.4 / game
16
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
80.6
HESI
79.0
PI
94.0
ORtg
75.3
DRtg
+18.7
NRtg
+13.6
Stable NRtg
85%
Stop%
47%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
13%
PIE
86.3
Team DRtg
+11.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.