ORtg
52.1
43rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Nadjatou Abdoulaye Djibril
Small Forward · BEN · b. 2009
//measurables
170 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
6.3 RPGRebounding · 83rd event percentile
4.0 PPGScoring load · 56th event percentile
- 21.3
- HESI v2.1
- #112
- of 142
- 60%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #112 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
21.3
Event performance
21st event percentile
PI
29.7
Prospect index
21st event percentile
ORtg
52.1
Points / 100 poss.
43rd event percentile
DRtg
80.0
Lower is better
12th event percentile
NRtg
-27.9
Two-way margin
29th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 52.1 · 43rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 80.0 · Stop% 61.7% · Team DRtg 80.2
Sample context
4 games · 90 minutes · 60% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
6.3 RPG83rd event percentile
Scoring load
4.0 PPG56th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
21.3
21st event percentile
Prospect index
29.7
21st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
52.1
43rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
80.0
12th event percentile
Two-way margin
-27.9
29th event percentile
Stop percentage
61.7%
35th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
4.0 PPG
56th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
51st event percentile
Rebounding
6.3 RPG
83rd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks
43rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
30.5% TS
43rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 21st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 52.1 ORtg and 80.0 DRtg, producing a -27.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 83rd event percentile
Rebounding
6.3 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 12th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
80.0 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 29th event percentile
Two-way margin
-27.9 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 35th event percentile
Defensive stops
61.7% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
4.0 PPG
56th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
30.5%
43rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
17.6%
19th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
17.6%
22nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
47.6%
42nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
29.3%
55th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
51st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
80.0
12th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.2
66th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
61.7%
35th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.8 STL+BLK
43rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
28.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-27.9
29th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-20.2
21st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
21.3
21st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
29.7
21st event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.0%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
6.3 RPG
83rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
90.1
context22.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
60.0%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#112
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
406.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
4.0
PPG
6.3
RPG
1.0
APG
#112
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#5
RANK
20
FIELD
79%
PERCENTILE
1.5
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#112/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
6.3
RPG
1.0
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
31%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P56
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
6.3
P83
True shooting
31%
P43
Two-way impact
-27.9
P29
Stops
62%
P35
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
18%
3 made / 17 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
48%
10 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 17●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
16
PTS
4.0 / game
3–17
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
10–21
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.0 / game
12
TOV
3.0 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
25
REB
6.3 / game
10
OREB
15
DREB
6.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
21.3
HESI
29.7
PI
52.1
ORtg
80.0
DRtg
-27.9
NRtg
-20.2
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
29%
Floor%
18%
eFG%
2%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
+0.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#5/20view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.5
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.0
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
32%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.5
P38
Playmaking
1.0
P65
Rebounding
5.0
P63
True shooting
32%
P72
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 2●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
3
PTS
1.5 / game
0–2
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
3–6
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
1.0 / game
6
TOV
3.0 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
10
REB
5.0 / game
2
OREB
8
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
3.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
6
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
0%
eFG%
4%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #111Verdiane Editha LenguendiatCentral African Republicrank_below · #113Segolene TchumsaF · Cameroon
//current_rank
#112
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#110
Kenya
9.5 PPG 7.7 RPG 1.7 APG
//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.7 RPG + 4.0 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#111
#113
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
2
GP
1.5
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.0
APG
3.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
32%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #112
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
6.3
RPG
1.0
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
31%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P56
Playmaking
1.0
P51
Rebounding
6.3
P83
True shooting
31%
P43
Two-way impact
-27.9
P29
Stops
62%
P35
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
18%
3 made / 17 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
48%
10 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 17●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
16
PTS
4.0 / game
3–17
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
10–21
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.0 / game
12
TOV
3.0 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
25
REB
6.3 / game
10
OREB
15
DREB
6.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
6
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
21.3
HESI
29.7
PI
52.1
ORtg
80.0
DRtg
-27.9
NRtg
-20.2
Stable NRtg
62%
Stop%
29%
Floor%
18%
eFG%
2%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
+0.2
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 32026
2 GP · event rank #5
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.5
PPG
5.0
RPG
1.0
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
32%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.5
P38
Playmaking
1.0
P65
Rebounding
5.0
P63
True shooting
32%
P72
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 2●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
3
PTS
1.5 / game
0–2
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
3–6
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
1.0 / game
6
TOV
3.0 / game
0.33×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
10
REB
5.0 / game
2
OREB
8
DREB
5.0
REB/G
defense
6
STL
3.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
8
PF
6
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
0%
eFG%
4%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.