ORtg
45.9
35th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Scholastica Wileka Maburu
KEN · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRebounder7.7 RPG · 89th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.7 RPG + 4.0 defensive plays/G · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per game · 85th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
7.7 RPGRebounding · 89th event percentile
4.0 stocksDefensive activity · 85th event percentile
- 22.0
- HESI v2.1
- #110
- of 142
- 77%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #110 of 142 · Established
HESI
22.0
Event performance
22nd event percentile
PI
30.3
Prospect index
23rd event percentile
ORtg
45.9
Points / 100 poss.
35th event percentile
DRtg
68.8
Lower is better
37th event percentile
NRtg
-22.9
Two-way margin
36th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 45.9 · 35th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 68.8 · Stop% 68.3% · Team DRtg 69.2
Sample context
6 games · 198 minutes · 77% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
7.7 RPG89th event percentile
Defensive activity
4.0 stocks85th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
22.0
22nd event percentile
Prospect index
30.3
23rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
45.9
35th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
68.8
37th event percentile
Two-way margin
-22.9
36th event percentile
Stop percentage
68.3%
63rd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
9.5 PPG
85th event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
73rd event percentile
Rebounding
7.7 RPG
89th event percentile
Defensive activity
4.0 stocks
85th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
24.5% TS
24th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P89
Rebounder
7.7 RPG · 89th event percentile
- P86
Activity
7.7 RPG + 4.0 defensive plays/G · 86th event percentile
- P85
Disruptor
4.0 steals + blocks per game · 85th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 22nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 45.9 ORtg and 68.8 DRtg, producing a -22.9 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive activity, and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 89th event percentile
Rebounding
7.7 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 85th event percentile
Defensive activity
4.0 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
- 85th event percentile
Scoring load
9.5 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 24th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
24.5% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 35th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
45.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 36th event percentile
Two-way margin
-22.9 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
9.5 PPG
85th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
24.5%
24th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
22.7%
31st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
18.2%
23rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
20.0%
context8.3 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
19.8%
29th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.7 APG
73rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
68.8
37th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
69.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.5
69th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
68.3%
63rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
4.0 STL+BLK
85th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
65.3
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-22.9
36th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-19.6
22nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
22.0
22nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
30.3
23rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-7.5%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.7 RPG
89th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
198.2
context33.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
76.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#110
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
579.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
9.5
PPG
7.7
RPG
1.7
APG
#110
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#5
RANK
48
FIELD
91%
PERCENTILE
17.6
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#110/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.5
PPG
7.7
RPG
1.7
APG
6.3
TOV/G
1.7
3PM/G
25%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.5
P85
Playmaking
1.7
P73
Rebounding
7.7
P89
True shooting
25%
P24
Two-way impact
-22.9
P36
Stops
68%
P63
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
18%
20 made / 110 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
10 made / 50 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
7 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
45% of attempts from three
●2PA 60●3PA 50
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
57
PTS
9.5 / game
20–110
FGM–FGA
10–50
3PM–3PA
7–14
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
38
TOV
6.3 / game
0.26×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
46
REB
7.7 / game
18
OREB
28
DREB
7.7
REB/G
defense
21
STL
3.5 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
12
PF
24
STL+BLK
4.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
22.0
HESI
30.3
PI
45.9
ORtg
68.8
DRtg
-22.9
NRtg
-19.6
Stable NRtg
68%
Stop%
20%
Floor%
23%
eFG%
-8%
PIE
69.2
Team DRtg
+0.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#5/48view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
17.6
PPG
6.4
RPG
1.8
APG
5.0
TOV/G
2.2
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
17.6
P97
Playmaking
1.8
P70
Rebounding
6.4
P82
True shooting
46%
P81
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
32 made / 89 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
11 made / 41 attempts
FT
Free throws
81%
13 made / 16 attempts
Shot selection
46% of attempts from three
●2PA 48●3PA 41
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
88
PTS
17.6 / game
32–89
FGM–FGA
11–41
3PM–3PA
13–16
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.8 / game
25
TOV
5.0 / game
0.36×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
32
REB
6.4 / game
9
OREB
23
DREB
6.4
REB/G
defense
15
STL
3.0 / game
5
BLK
1.0 / game
17
PF
20
STL+BLK
4.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
42%
eFG%
5%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #109Marwa AbdelkaderMoroccorank_below · #111Verdiane Editha LenguendiatCentral African Republic
//current_rank
#110
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#108
#109
#111
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
17.6
PPG
6.4
RPG
1.8
APG
3.0
SPG
1.0
BPG
—
3P%
46%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #110
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.5
PPG
7.7
RPG
1.7
APG
6.3
TOV/G
1.7
3PM/G
25%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.5
P85
Playmaking
1.7
P73
Rebounding
7.7
P89
True shooting
25%
P24
Two-way impact
-22.9
P36
Stops
68%
P63
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
18%
20 made / 110 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
10 made / 50 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
7 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
45% of attempts from three
●2PA 60●3PA 50
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
57
PTS
9.5 / game
20–110
FGM–FGA
10–50
3PM–3PA
7–14
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
38
TOV
6.3 / game
0.26×
AST:TOV
13
FD
rebounding
46
REB
7.7 / game
18
OREB
28
DREB
7.7
REB/G
defense
21
STL
3.5 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
12
PF
24
STL+BLK
4.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
22.0
HESI
30.3
PI
45.9
ORtg
68.8
DRtg
-22.9
NRtg
-19.6
Stable NRtg
68%
Stop%
20%
Floor%
23%
eFG%
-8%
PIE
69.2
Team DRtg
+0.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
5 GP · event rank #5
//quick_read
The line at a glance
17.6
PPG
6.4
RPG
1.8
APG
5.0
TOV/G
2.2
3PM/G
46%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
17.6
P97
Playmaking
1.8
P70
Rebounding
6.4
P82
True shooting
46%
P81
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
32 made / 89 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
27%
11 made / 41 attempts
FT
Free throws
81%
13 made / 16 attempts
Shot selection
46% of attempts from three
●2PA 48●3PA 41
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
88
PTS
17.6 / game
32–89
FGM–FGA
11–41
3PM–3PA
13–16
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.8 / game
25
TOV
5.0 / game
0.36×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
32
REB
6.4 / game
9
OREB
23
DREB
6.4
REB/G
defense
15
STL
3.0 / game
5
BLK
1.0 / game
17
PF
20
STL+BLK
4.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
42%
eFG%
5%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.