ORtg
52.6
45th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Marwa Abdelkader
MAR · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
44.5% TSScoring efficiency · 86th event percentile
7.0 PPGScoring load · 77th event percentile
- 22.7
- HESI v2.1
- #109
- of 142
- 44%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #109 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
22.7
Event performance
23rd event percentile
PI
30.9
Prospect index
24th event percentile
ORtg
52.6
Points / 100 poss.
45th event percentile
DRtg
85.4
Lower is better
3rd event percentile
NRtg
-32.8
Two-way margin
26th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 52.6 · 45th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 85.4 · Stop% 44.3% · Team DRtg 77.8
Sample context
3 games · 48 minutes · 44% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
44.5% TS86th event percentile
Scoring load
7.0 PPG77th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
22.7
23rd event percentile
Prospect index
30.9
24th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
52.6
45th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
85.4
3rd event percentile
Two-way margin
-32.8
26th event percentile
Stop percentage
44.3%
7th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.0 PPG
77th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Rebounding
1.0 RPG
15th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.3 stocks
19th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
44.5% TS
86th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 23rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 52.6 ORtg and 85.4 DRtg, producing a -32.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, creation, and defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 86th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
44.5% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 77th event percentile
Scoring load
7.0 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 3rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
85.4 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 6th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 7th event percentile
Defensive stops
44.3% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.0 PPG
77th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
44.5%
86th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
41.2%
86th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
29.4%
57th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
33.3%
context4.0 attempts per game
Free throws
46.7%
40th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
24.2%
39th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
6th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
85.4
3rd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
77.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-7.5
14th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
44.3%
7th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.3 STL+BLK
19th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
9.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-32.8
26th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-19.3
23rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
22.7
23rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
30.9
24th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-9.1%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.0 RPG
15th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
47.6
context15.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
44.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#109
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
366.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
3
GP
7.0
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.0
APG
#109
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#16
RANK
31
FIELD
50%
PERCENTILE
9.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#109/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.0
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.0
APG
4.7
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.0
P77
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
1.0
P15
True shooting
45%
P86
Two-way impact
-32.8
P26
Stops
44%
P7
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
29%
5 made / 17 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
4 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
47%
7 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
71% of attempts from three
●2PA 5●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
21
PTS
7.0 / game
5–17
FGM–FGA
4–12
3PM–3PA
7–15
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
14
TOV
4.7 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
3
REB
1.0 / game
0
OREB
3
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
22.7
HESI
30.9
PI
52.6
ORtg
85.4
DRtg
-32.8
NRtg
-19.3
Stable NRtg
44%
Stop%
24%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
-9%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
-7.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#16/31view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.3
APG
2.0
TOV/G
2.3
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.0
P66
Playmaking
2.3
P73
Rebounding
4.3
P52
True shooting
36%
P42
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
13 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
9 made / 30 attempts
FT
Free throws
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
63% of attempts from three
●2PA 18●3PA 30
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
36
PTS
9.0 / game
13–48
FGM–FGA
9–30
3PM–3PA
1–5
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
2.3 / game
8
TOV
2.0 / game
1.13×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
17
REB
4.3 / game
3
OREB
14
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
37%
eFG%
2%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #108Elisa Inés Demele MandougbouCentral African Republicrank_below · #110Scholastica Wileka MaburuKenya
//current_rank
#109
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#107
#108
#110
Kenya
9.5 PPG 7.7 RPG 1.7 APG
//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity7.7 RPG + 4.0 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
9.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.3
APG
1.3
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
36%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
3 GP · event rank #109
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.0
PPG
1.0
RPG
0.0
APG
4.7
TOV/G
1.3
3PM/G
45%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.0
P77
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
1.0
P15
True shooting
45%
P86
Two-way impact
-32.8
P26
Stops
44%
P7
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
29%
5 made / 17 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
4 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
47%
7 made / 15 attempts
Shot selection
71% of attempts from three
●2PA 5●3PA 12
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
21
PTS
7.0 / game
5–17
FGM–FGA
4–12
3PM–3PA
7–15
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
14
TOV
4.7 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
3
REB
1.0 / game
0
OREB
3
DREB
1.0
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
22.7
HESI
30.9
PI
52.6
ORtg
85.4
DRtg
-32.8
NRtg
-19.3
Stable NRtg
44%
Stop%
24%
Floor%
41%
eFG%
-9%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
-7.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #16
//quick_read
The line at a glance
9.0
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.3
APG
2.0
TOV/G
2.3
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
9.0
P66
Playmaking
2.3
P73
Rebounding
4.3
P52
True shooting
36%
P42
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
27%
13 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
30%
9 made / 30 attempts
FT
Free throws
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
Shot selection
63% of attempts from three
●2PA 18●3PA 30
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
36
PTS
9.0 / game
13–48
FGM–FGA
9–30
3PM–3PA
1–5
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
2.3 / game
8
TOV
2.0 / game
1.13×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
17
REB
4.3 / game
3
OREB
14
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
5
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
37%
eFG%
2%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.