Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Marwa Abdelkader

MAR · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

film-led profile

Film and human evaluation lead this profile.

4 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.

4
film items: 0
scout badges: On file
scout report

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

4 public videos

Available for visual validation

Scouting

Final report on file

Human evaluation is clearly labeled

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//film_room

Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.

film_room

Tape & footage

Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.

Featured clip

Clip

Starts muted. Turn sound on in the player.

Clip

vs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd Wael

YouTube · approved scout evidence

Open source

More footage

Clipvs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
Clip
Clipvs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
Clip
Clipvs vs egypt U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd WaelYouTube · approved scout evidence
Clip

//human_evaluation

Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.

//scouting_report · evidence_basis

Scouting report on file

Fahd Wael

Report date: 2026-09-09

verified_human_evaluation

Basketball verdict

Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first

// projected_role

lead_guard · combo_guard · on-ball creator · secondary creator / connector

lead_guard · combo_guard · on-ball creator · secondary creator / connector. No separator is established yet Primary pressure points: Gap help, Advantage extension, Point-of-attack defense.

Now · Lead GuardNow · Combo GuardProjects · Lead GuardProjects · Combo Guard

Translatable strengths

Not confirmed in this report.

Exploitable weaknesses

· Gap help
· Advantage extension
· Point-of-attack defense

Offensive translation

Projects to retain a primary role as a on-ball creator. Projects to retain a primary role as a secondary creator / connector.

Defensive assignments

primary point-of-attack / screen navigator (grade 2; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). situational gap / nail helper (grade 1; assignment confirmed; workload likely reduces at the target level).

Best offensive fit

Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.

Best defensive fit

Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.

Limiting environments

No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.

Development priorities

Gap help · Advantage extension

evidence_and_projection

Why the verdict holds

evidence_strength

strong

3 representative game samples reviewed.

pathway_hypothesis

Insufficient evidence

Insufficient evidence for a basketball pathway conclusion.

Evidence gates incomplete

hesi_reconciliation

Scout view × current production

Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.

Current event production

inconclusive

22.7 performance rating · rank 109 · 3 games

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Estimated offensive efficiency

inconclusive

ORtg 52.6 · descriptive event context, not a role projection

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Floor percentage context

inconclusive

24.2% · possession outcome context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

Stop percentage context

inconclusive

44.3% · box-score estimate with team and role context

Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.

next_evaluation_assignment

Complete at least eight applicable trait observations

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #109 of 142 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

22.7

Event performance

23rd event percentile

30.9

Prospect index

24th event percentile

ORtg

52.6

Points / 100 poss.

45th event percentile

DRtg

85.4

Lower is better

3rd event percentile

NRtg

-32.8

Two-way margin

26th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 52.6 · 45th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 85.4 · Stop% 44.3% · Team DRtg 77.8

Sample context

3 games · 48 minutes · 44% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

44.5% TS86th event percentile

Scoring load

7.0 PPG77th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

22.7

23rd event percentile

Prospect index

30.9

24th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

52.6

45th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

85.4

3rd event percentile

Two-way margin

-32.8

26th event percentile

Stop percentage

44.3%

7th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

7.0 PPG

77th event percentile

Creation

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Rebounding

1.0 RPG

15th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.3 stocks

19th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

44.5% TS

86th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 23rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 52.6 ORtg and 85.4 DRtg, producing a -32.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, creation, and defensive stops.

Relative strengths

Scoring efficiency
44.5% TS
86th event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Scoring load
7.0 PPG
77th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
85.4 DRtg
3rd event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Defensive stops
44.3% Stop%
7th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

52.6

45th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

7.0 PPG

77th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

44.5%

86th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

41.2%

86th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

29.4%

57th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

33.3%

context

4.0 attempts per game

Free throws

46.7%

40th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

24.2%

39th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

85.4

3rd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

77.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-7.5

14th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

44.3%

7th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.3 STL+BLK

19th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

9.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-32.8

26th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-19.3

23rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

22.7

23rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

30.9

24th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-9.1%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.0 RPG

15th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

47.6

context

15.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

44.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#109

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

366.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

7.0

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.0

APG

#109

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#16

RANK

FIELD

50%

PERCENTILE

9.0

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#109/142Event board →

7.0

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.0

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#16/31Event board →

9.0

PPG

4.3

RPG

2.3

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

rank_above · #108Elisa Inés Demele MandougbouCentral African Republic

//current_rank

#109

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #110Scholastica Wileka MaburuKenya

#1
Couda Keita
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
#107
Briana Mbo Apiyo Fumbula
Kenya
2.0 PPG 6.5 RPG 0.7 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

9.0

PPG

4.3

RPG

2.3

APG

1.3

SPG

0.0

BPG

—

3P%

36%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

3 GP · event rank #109

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.0

PPG

1.0

RPG

0.0

APG

4.7

TOV/G

1.3

3PM/G

45%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.0

P77

Playmaking

0.0

Rebounding

1.0

P15

True shooting

45%

P86

Two-way impact

-32.8

P26

Stops

44%

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

29%

5 made / 17 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

33%

4 made / 12 attempts

Free throws

47%

7 made / 15 attempts

Shot selection

71% of attempts from three

●2PA 5●3PA 12

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

7.0 / game

5–17

FGM–FGA

4–12

3PM–3PA

7–15

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.0 / game

TOV

4.7 / game

0.00×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

1.0 / game

OREB

DREB

1.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.3 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

22.7

HESI

30.9

52.6

ORtg

85.4

DRtg

-32.8

NRtg

-19.3

Stable NRtg

44%

Stop%

24%

Floor%

41%

eFG%

-9%

PIE

77.8

Team DRtg

-7.5

Def. lift

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026

4 GP · event rank #16

//quick_read

The line at a glance

9.0

PPG

4.3

RPG

2.3

APG

2.0

TOV/G

2.3

3PM/G

36%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

9.0

P66

Playmaking

2.3

P73

Rebounding

4.3

P52

True shooting

36%

P42

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

27%

13 made / 48 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

30%

9 made / 30 attempts

Free throws

20%

1 made / 5 attempts

Shot selection

63% of attempts from three

●2PA 18●3PA 30

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

9.0 / game

13–48

FGM–FGA

9–30

3PM–3PA

1–5

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.3 / game

TOV

2.0 / game

1.13×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

4.3 / game

OREB

DREB

4.3

REB/G

defense

STL

1.3 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

37%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.