ORtg
44.4
33rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Elisa Inés Demele Mandougbou
CAF · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRebounder7.4 RPG · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
7.4 RPGRebounding · 86th event percentile
37.0% TSScoring efficiency · 60th event percentile
- 24.8
- HESI v2.1
- #108
- of 142
- 62%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #108 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
24.8
Event performance
25th event percentile
PI
31.4
Prospect index
24th event percentile
ORtg
44.4
Points / 100 poss.
33rd event percentile
DRtg
69.1
Lower is better
35th event percentile
NRtg
-24.7
Two-way margin
33rd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 44.4 · 33rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 69.1 · Stop% 72.7% · Team DRtg 72.5
Sample context
5 games · 98 minutes · 62% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
7.4 RPG86th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.0% TS60th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
24.8
25th event percentile
Prospect index
31.4
24th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
44.4
33rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
69.1
35th event percentile
Two-way margin
-24.7
33rd event percentile
Stop percentage
72.7%
74th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.2 PPG
43rd event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
18th event percentile
Rebounding
7.4 RPG
86th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks
44th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.0% TS
60th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P86
Rebounder
7.4 RPG · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 25th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 44.4 ORtg and 69.1 DRtg, producing a -24.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding and defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are creation, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 86th event percentile
Rebounding
7.4 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 74th event percentile
Defensive stops
72.7% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 18th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 33rd event percentile
Two-way margin
-24.7 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 33rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
44.4 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.2 PPG
43rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
37.0%
60th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
31.6%
54th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
31.6%
66th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.4 attempts per game
Free throws
66.7%
80th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
22.6%
36th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
18th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
69.1
35th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
72.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.4
83rd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
72.7%
74th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.8 STL+BLK
44th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
39.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-24.7
33rd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-18.5
25th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
24.8
25th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
31.4
24th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.0%
52nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.4 RPG
86th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
98.1
context19.6 minutes per game.
Sample weight
62.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#108
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
552.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
3.2
PPG
7.4
RPG
0.2
APG
#108
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#108/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.2
PPG
7.4
RPG
0.2
APG
3.6
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.2
P43
Playmaking
0.2
P18
Rebounding
7.4
P86
True shooting
37%
P60
Two-way impact
-24.7
P33
Stops
73%
P74
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
32%
6 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
11% of attempts from three
●2PA 17●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
16
PTS
3.2 / game
6–19
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
4–6
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
18
TOV
3.6 / game
0.06×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
37
REB
7.4 / game
15
OREB
22
DREB
7.4
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
19
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
24.8
HESI
31.4
PI
44.4
ORtg
69.1
DRtg
-24.7
NRtg
-18.5
Stable NRtg
73%
Stop%
23%
Floor%
32%
eFG%
4%
PIE
72.5
Team DRtg
+3.4
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #107Briana Mbo Apiyo FumbulaKenyarank_below · #109Marwa AbdelkaderMorocco
//current_rank
#108
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#106
#107
#109
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
3.2
PPG
7.4
RPG
0.2
APG
1.8
SPG
0.0
BPG
0%
3P%
37%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #108
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.2
PPG
7.4
RPG
0.2
APG
3.6
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.2
P43
Playmaking
0.2
P18
Rebounding
7.4
P86
True shooting
37%
P60
Two-way impact
-24.7
P33
Stops
73%
P74
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
32%
6 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
67%
4 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
11% of attempts from three
●2PA 17●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
16
PTS
3.2 / game
6–19
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
4–6
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
18
TOV
3.6 / game
0.06×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
37
REB
7.4 / game
15
OREB
22
DREB
7.4
REB/G
defense
9
STL
1.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
19
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
24.8
HESI
31.4
PI
44.4
ORtg
69.1
DRtg
-24.7
NRtg
-18.5
Stable NRtg
73%
Stop%
23%
Floor%
32%
eFG%
4%
PIE
72.5
Team DRtg
+3.4
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.