Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Briana Mbo Apiyo Fumbula

KEN · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

6.5 RPGRebounding · 84th event percentile

1.3 stocksDefensive activity · 38th event percentile

24.1
HESI v2.1: #107
of 142: 63%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #107 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

24.1

Event performance

24th event percentile

32.0

Prospect index

25th event percentile

ORtg

44.2

Points / 100 poss.

32nd event percentile

DRtg

68.8

Lower is better

36th event percentile

NRtg

-24.6

Two-way margin

33rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 44.2 · 32nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 68.8 · Stop% 68.2% · Team DRtg 69.2

Sample context

6 games · 103 minutes · 63% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

6.5 RPG84th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.3 stocks38th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

24.1

24th event percentile

Prospect index

32.0

25th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

44.2

32nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

68.8

36th event percentile

Two-way margin

-24.6

33rd event percentile

Stop percentage

68.2%

61st event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.0 PPG

29th event percentile

Creation

0.7 APG

37th event percentile

Rebounding

6.5 RPG

84th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.3 stocks

38th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

25.3% TS

27th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 24th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 44.2 ORtg and 68.8 DRtg, producing a -24.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is rebounding. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, scoring load, and offensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

Rebounding
6.5 RPG
84th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring efficiency
25.3% TS
27th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Scoring load
2.0 PPG
29th event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
Offensive efficiency
44.2 ORtg
32nd event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

44.2

32nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.0 PPG

29th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

25.3%

27th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

27.3%

42nd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

27.3%

50th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.7 attempts per game

Free throws

0.0%

5th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

21.9%

34th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.7 APG

37th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

68.8

36th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

69.2

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.4

68th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

68.2%

61st event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.3 STL+BLK

38th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

33.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-24.6

33rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-18.7

24th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

24.1

24th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

32.0

25th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

6.1%

71st event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

6.5 RPG

84th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

102.8

context

17.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

63.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#107

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

579.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

2.0

PPG

6.5

RPG

0.7

APG

#107

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#25

RANK

FIELD

49%

PERCENTILE

1.8

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#107/142Event board →

2.0

PPG

6.5

RPG

0.7

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#25/48Event board →

1.8

PPG

5.6

RPG

2.2

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

rank_above · #106Habsatou MbodjF · Senegal

//current_rank

#107

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #108Elisa Inés Demele MandougbouCentral African Republic

#1
Couda Keita
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
#105
Malak El Mourid
Morocco
2.5 PPG 1.5 RPG 0.8 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

1.8

PPG

5.6

RPG

2.2

APG

0.8

SPG

0.0

BPG

—

3P%

28%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #107

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.0

PPG

6.5

RPG

0.7

APG

2.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

25%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.0

P29

Playmaking

0.7

P37

Rebounding

6.5

P84

True shooting

25%

P27

Two-way impact

-24.6

P33

Stops

68%

P61

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

27%

6 made / 22 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 4 attempts

Free throws

0 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

18% of attempts from three

●2PA 18●3PA 4

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

2.0 / game

6–22

FGM–FGA

0–4

3PM–3PA

0–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.7 / game

TOV

2.0 / game

0.33×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

6.5 / game

OREB

DREB

6.5

REB/G

defense

STL

1.3 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

24.1

HESI

32.0

44.2

ORtg

68.8

DRtg

-24.6

NRtg

-18.7

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

22%

Floor%

27%

eFG%

PIE

69.2

Team DRtg

+0.4

Def. lift

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026

5 GP · event rank #25

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.8

PPG

5.6

RPG

2.2

APG

1.6

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

28%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.8

P32

Playmaking

2.2

P76

Rebounding

5.6

P76

True shooting

28%

P34

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

20%

3 made / 15 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

40%

2 made / 5 attempts

Free throws

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Shot selection

33% of attempts from three

●2PA 10●3PA 5

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

1.8 / game

3–15

FGM–FGA

2–5

3PM–3PA

1–2

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.2 / game

TOV

1.6 / game

1.38×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

5.6 / game

OREB

DREB

5.6

REB/G

defense

STL

0.8 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

27%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.