ORtg
41.0
29th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Malak El Mourid
MAR · b. 2009
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
35.3% TSScoring efficiency · 56th event percentile
0.8 APGCreation · 40th event percentile
- 26.2
- HESI v2.1
- #105
- of 142
- 41%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #105 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
26.2
Event performance
26th event percentile
PI
33.7
Prospect index
26th event percentile
ORtg
41.0
Points / 100 poss.
29th event percentile
DRtg
72.3
Lower is better
28th event percentile
NRtg
-31.2
Two-way margin
28th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 41.0 · 29th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 72.3 · Stop% 75.9% · Team DRtg 77.8
Sample context
4 games · 41 minutes · 41% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
35.3% TS56th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG40th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
26.2
26th event percentile
Prospect index
33.7
26th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
41.0
29th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
72.3
28th event percentile
Two-way margin
-31.2
28th event percentile
Stop percentage
75.9%
78th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
2.5 PPG
35th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
40th event percentile
Rebounding
1.5 RPG
23rd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.5 stocks
40th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
35.3% TS
56th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 26th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 41.0 ORtg and 72.3 DRtg, producing a -31.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 78th event percentile
Defensive stops
75.9% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 23rd event percentile
Rebounding
1.5 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 28th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
72.3 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 28th event percentile
Two-way margin
-31.2 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
2.5 PPG
35th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
35.3%
56th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
37.5%
75th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
37.5%
85th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.3 attempts per game
Free throws
28.6%
19th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
23.3%
38th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
40th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
72.3
28th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
77.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+5.6
90th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
75.9%
78th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.5 STL+BLK
40th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
14.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-31.2
28th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-17.8
26th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
26.2
26th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
33.7
26th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-4.2%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.5 RPG
23rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
41.3
context10.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
40.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#105
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
366.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
2.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
0.8
APG
#105
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#105/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
0.8
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
35%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.5
P35
Playmaking
0.8
P40
Rebounding
1.5
P23
True shooting
35%
P56
Two-way impact
-31.2
P28
Stops
76%
P78
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
29%
4 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
13% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 1
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
10
PTS
2.5 / game
3–8
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
4–14
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.8 / game
12
TOV
3.0 / game
0.25×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
6
REB
1.5 / game
2
OREB
4
DREB
1.5
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
26.2
HESI
33.7
PI
41.0
ORtg
72.3
DRtg
-31.2
NRtg
-17.8
Stable NRtg
76%
Stop%
23%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
-4%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
+5.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#26/31view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.5
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.8
APG
2.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
28%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.5
P23
Playmaking
0.8
P24
Rebounding
2.8
P23
True shooting
28%
P27
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
17%
2 made / 12 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
43%
6 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
17% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
10
PTS
2.5 / game
2–12
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
6–14
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.8 / game
10
TOV
2.5 / game
0.30×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.8 / game
4
OREB
7
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
3
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
17%
eFG%
0%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #104Ala SbiiSG · Tunisiarank_below · #106Habsatou MbodjF · Senegal
//current_rank
#105
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#103
#104
#106
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
2.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
0.8
APG
1.5
SPG
0.0
BPG
0%
3P%
35%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #105
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.5
PPG
1.5
RPG
0.8
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
35%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.5
P35
Playmaking
0.8
P40
Rebounding
1.5
P23
True shooting
35%
P56
Two-way impact
-31.2
P28
Stops
76%
P78
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
3 made / 8 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
29%
4 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
13% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 1
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
10
PTS
2.5 / game
3–8
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
4–14
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.8 / game
12
TOV
3.0 / game
0.25×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
6
REB
1.5 / game
2
OREB
4
DREB
1.5
REB/G
defense
6
STL
1.5 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
3
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
26.2
HESI
33.7
PI
41.0
ORtg
72.3
DRtg
-31.2
NRtg
-17.8
Stable NRtg
76%
Stop%
23%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
-4%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
+5.6
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #26
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.5
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.8
APG
2.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
28%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.5
P23
Playmaking
0.8
P24
Rebounding
2.8
P23
True shooting
28%
P27
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
17%
2 made / 12 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
43%
6 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
17% of attempts from three
●2PA 10●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
10
PTS
2.5 / game
2–12
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
6–14
FTM–FTA
creation
3
AST
0.8 / game
10
TOV
2.5 / game
0.30×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
11
REB
2.8 / game
4
OREB
7
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
2
BLK
0.5 / game
3
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
17%
eFG%
0%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.