back_to_rankings
Ala Sbii portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Ala Sbii

Shooting Guard · TUN · b. 2009

//measurables

172 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

2.7 APGCreation · 87th event percentile

3.2 RPGRebounding · 48th event percentile

26.9
HESI v2.1
#104
of 142
64%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #104 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

26.9

Event performance

27th event percentile

PI

34.3

Prospect index

27th event percentile

ORtg

40.2

Points / 100 poss.

27th event percentile

DRtg

62.8

Lower is better

52nd event percentile

NRtg

-22.6

Two-way margin

37th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 40.2 · 27th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 62.8 · Stop% 68.3% · Team DRtg 62.1

Sample context

6 games · 107 minutes · 64% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

2.7 APG87th event percentile

Rebounding

3.2 RPG48th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

  3. 03

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

26.9

27th event percentile

Prospect index

34.3

27th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

40.2

27th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

62.8

52nd event percentile

Two-way margin

-22.6

37th event percentile

Stop percentage

68.3%

62nd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.5 PPG

24th event percentile

Creation

2.7 APG

87th event percentile

Rebounding

3.2 RPG

48th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.3 stocks

38th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

27.2% TS

35th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 27th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 40.2 ORtg and 62.8 DRtg, producing a -22.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, offensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    2.7 APG

    87th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Scoring load

    1.5 PPG

    24th event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

  2. Offensive efficiency

    40.2 ORtg

    27th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    27.2% TS

    35th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

40.2

27th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.5 PPG

24th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

27.2%

35th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

19.2%

23rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

15.4%

16th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

14.3%

context

1.2 attempts per game

Free throws

50.0%

53rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

18.6%

27th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.7 APG

87th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

62.8

52nd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

62.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-0.7

57th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

68.3%

62nd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.3 STL+BLK

38th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

30.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-22.6

37th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-17.5

27th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

26.9

27th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

34.3

27th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

5.4%

64th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.2 RPG

48th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

107.0

context

17.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

64.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#104

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

505.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

6

GP

1.5

PPG

3.2

RPG

2.7

APG

#104

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#4

RANK

31

FIELD

90%

PERCENTILE

6.0

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#104/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.5

PPG

3.2

RPG

2.7

APG

3.8

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

27%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.5

P24

Playmaking

2.7

P87

Rebounding

3.2

P48

True shooting

27%

P35

Two-way impact

-22.6

P37

Stops

68%

P62

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

15%

2 made / 13 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

1 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

4 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

54% of attempts from three

2PA 63PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

9

PTS

1.5 / game

2–13

FGM–FGA

1–7

3PM–3PA

4–8

FTM–FTA

creation

16

AST

2.7 / game

23

TOV

3.8 / game

0.70×

AST:TOV

6

FD

rebounding

19

REB

3.2 / game

4

OREB

15

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

8

STL

1.3 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

2

PF

8

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

26.9

HESI

34.3

PI

40.2

ORtg

62.8

DRtg

-22.6

NRtg

-17.5

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

19%

Floor%

19%

eFG%

5%

PIE

62.1

Team DRtg

-0.7

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games107 minutes17.8 min/game64% sample weightrank #104 of 142

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.0

PPG

5.0

RPG

8.0

APG

2.8

TOV/G

1.0

3PM/G

42%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.0

P47

Playmaking

8.0

P98

Rebounding

5.0

P56

True shooting

42%

P69

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

32%

8 made / 25 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

31%

4 made / 13 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

4 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

52% of attempts from three

2PA 123PA 13

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

24

PTS

6.0 / game

8–25

FGM–FGA

4–13

3PM–3PA

4–8

FTM–FTA

creation

32

AST

8.0 / game

11

TOV

2.8 / game

2.91×

AST:TOV

FD

rebounding

20

REB

5.0 / game

4

OREB

16

DREB

5.0

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.8 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

9

PF

7

STL+BLK

1.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

40%

eFG%

10%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #4 of 31
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Couda Keita portrait#1

    Couda Keita

    Point Guard · Mali

    19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG

    //event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Hiba Zouhir portrait#102

    Hiba Zouhir

    Morocco

    5.8 PPG 5.3 RPG 0.3 APG

  • Mayer Daphine Atieno Otieno portrait#103

    Mayer Daphine Atieno Otieno

    Kenya

    0.0 PPG 0.3 RPG 0.0 APG

  • Malak El Mourid portrait#105

    Malak El Mourid

    Morocco

    2.5 PPG 1.5 RPG 0.8 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

6.0

PPG

5.0

RPG

8.0

APG

1.8

SPG

0.0

BPG

3P%

42%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #104

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.5

PPG

3.2

RPG

2.7

APG

3.8

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

27%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.5

P24

Playmaking

2.7

P87

Rebounding

3.2

P48

True shooting

27%

P35

Two-way impact

-22.6

P37

Stops

68%

P62

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

15%

2 made / 13 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

14%

1 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

4 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

54% of attempts from three

2PA 63PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

9

PTS

1.5 / game

2–13

FGM–FGA

1–7

3PM–3PA

4–8

FTM–FTA

creation

16

AST

2.7 / game

23

TOV

3.8 / game

0.70×

AST:TOV

6

FD

rebounding

19

REB

3.2 / game

4

OREB

15

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

8

STL

1.3 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

2

PF

8

STL+BLK

1.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

26.9

HESI

34.3

PI

40.2

ORtg

62.8

DRtg

-22.6

NRtg

-17.5

Stable NRtg

68%

Stop%

19%

Floor%

19%

eFG%

5%

PIE

62.1

Team DRtg

-0.7

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games107 minutes17.8 min/game64% sample weightrank #104 of 142

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026

4 GP · event rank #4

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.0

PPG

5.0

RPG

8.0

APG

2.8

TOV/G

1.0

3PM/G

42%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.0

P47

Playmaking

8.0

P98

Rebounding

5.0

P56

True shooting

42%

P69

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

32%

8 made / 25 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

31%

4 made / 13 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

4 made / 8 attempts

Shot selection

52% of attempts from three

2PA 123PA 13

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

24

PTS

6.0 / game

8–25

FGM–FGA

4–13

3PM–3PA

4–8

FTM–FTA

creation

32

AST

8.0 / game

11

TOV

2.8 / game

2.91×

AST:TOV

FD

rebounding

20

REB

5.0 / game

4

OREB

16

DREB

5.0

REB/G

defense

7

STL

1.8 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

9

PF

7

STL+BLK

1.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

40%

eFG%

10%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #4 of 31

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.