ORtg
59.4
53rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Hiba Zouhir
MAR · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRim Protection1.0 BPG · 91st event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
47.8% TSScoring efficiency · 93rd event percentile
5.3 RPGRebounding · 74th event percentile
- 29.8
- HESI v2.1
- #102
- of 142
- 62%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #102 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
29.8
Event performance
30th event percentile
PI
35.3
Prospect index
29th event percentile
ORtg
59.4
Points / 100 poss.
53rd event percentile
DRtg
81.7
Lower is better
7th event percentile
NRtg
-22.4
Two-way margin
38th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 59.4 · 53rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 81.7 · Stop% 53.1% · Team DRtg 77.8
Sample context
4 games · 97 minutes · 62% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
47.8% TS93rd event percentile
Rebounding
5.3 RPG74th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
29.8
30th event percentile
Prospect index
35.3
29th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
59.4
53rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
81.7
7th event percentile
Two-way margin
-22.4
38th event percentile
Stop percentage
53.1%
17th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.8 PPG
68th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
23rd event percentile
Rebounding
5.3 RPG
74th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks
62nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
47.8% TS
93rd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P91
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 91st event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 30th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 59.4 ORtg and 81.7 DRtg, producing a -22.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, rebounding, and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and creation.
Relative strengths
- 93rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
47.8% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 74th event percentile
Rebounding
5.3 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
- 68th event percentile
Scoring load
5.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 7th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
81.7 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 17th event percentile
Defensive stops
53.1% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 23rd event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.8 PPG
68th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
47.8%
93rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.9%
91st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
42.9%
95th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
71.4%
85th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
29.8%
56th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
23rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
81.7
7th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
77.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-3.9
31st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
53.1%
17th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.8 STL+BLK
62nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
23.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-22.4
38th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-17.1
30th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
29.8
30th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
35.3
29th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
6.6%
62nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
5.3 RPG
74th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
96.8
context24.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
61.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#102
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
366.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
5.8
PPG
5.3
RPG
0.3
APG
#102
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#102/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.8
PPG
5.3
RPG
0.3
APG
3.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.8
P68
Playmaking
0.3
P23
Rebounding
5.3
P74
True shooting
48%
P93
Two-way impact
-22.4
P38
Stops
53%
P17
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
43%
9 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
5 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
5.8 / game
9–21
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
5–7
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
15
TOV
3.8 / game
0.07×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
21
REB
5.3 / game
11
OREB
10
DREB
5.3
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
4
BLK
1.0 / game
6
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
29.8
HESI
35.3
PI
59.4
ORtg
81.7
DRtg
-22.4
NRtg
-17.1
Stable NRtg
53%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
7%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
-3.9
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #101Islem AyariG · Tunisiarank_below · #103Mayer Daphine Atieno OtienoKenya
//current_rank
#102
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#100
#101
#103
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
5.8
PPG
5.3
RPG
0.3
APG
0.8
SPG
1.0
BPG
—
3P%
48%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #102
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.8
PPG
5.3
RPG
0.3
APG
3.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
48%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.8
P68
Playmaking
0.3
P23
Rebounding
5.3
P74
True shooting
48%
P93
Two-way impact
-22.4
P38
Stops
53%
P17
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
43%
9 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
71%
5 made / 7 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 21●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
5.8 / game
9–21
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
5–7
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
15
TOV
3.8 / game
0.07×
AST:TOV
4
FD
rebounding
21
REB
5.3 / game
11
OREB
10
DREB
5.3
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
4
BLK
1.0 / game
6
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
29.8
HESI
35.3
PI
59.4
ORtg
81.7
DRtg
-22.4
NRtg
-17.1
Stable NRtg
53%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
7%
PIE
77.8
Team DRtg
-3.9
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.