ORtg
0.0
1st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Mayer Daphine Atieno Otieno
KEN · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
0.0 stocksDefensive activity · 13th event percentile
0.0 APGCreation · 6th event percentile
- 29.1
- HESI v2.1
- #103
- of 142
- 12%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #103 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
29.1
Event performance
29th event percentile
PI
34.8
Prospect index
28th event percentile
ORtg
0.0
Points / 100 poss.
1st event percentile
DRtg
77.5
Lower is better
17th event percentile
NRtg
-77.5
Two-way margin
2nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 0.0 · 1st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 77.5 · Stop% 47.6% · Team DRtg 69.2
Sample context
3 games · 9 minutes · 12% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
0.0 stocks13th event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG6th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
29.1
29th event percentile
Prospect index
34.8
28th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
0.0
1st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
77.5
17th event percentile
Two-way margin
-77.5
2nd event percentile
Stop percentage
47.6%
11th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
0.0 PPG
3rd event percentile
Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Rebounding
0.3 RPG
3rd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.0 stocks
13th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
0.0% TS
2nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 29th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 0.0 ORtg and 77.5 DRtg, producing a -77.5 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 1st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
0.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 2nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
0.0% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 2nd event percentile
Two-way margin
-77.5 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
0.0 PPG
3rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
0.0%
2nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
0.0%
3rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
0.0%
3rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Floor%
0.0%
1st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.0 APG
6th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
77.5
17th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
69.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-8.3
12th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
47.6%
11th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.0 STL+BLK
13th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
2.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-77.5
2nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-17.1
29th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
29.1
29th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
34.8
28th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-1.8%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
0.3 RPG
3rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
8.5
context2.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
12.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#103
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
579.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
3
GP
0.0
PPG
0.3
RPG
0.0
APG
#103
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#103/142Event board →
3
GP
0.0
PPG
0.3
RPG
0.0
APG
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#36/48Event board →
4
GP
0.5
PPG
3.3
RPG
0.0
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
rank_above · #102Hiba ZouhirMoroccorank_below · #104Ala SbiiSG · Tunisia
//current_rank
#103
of 142 ranked
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#101
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
3
GP
0.0
PPG
0.3
RPG
0.0
APG
0.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
0%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
3 GP · event rank #103
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.0
PPG
0.3
RPG
0.0
APG
0.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
0%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.0
P3
Playmaking
0.0
P6
Rebounding
0.3
P3
True shooting
0%
P2
Two-way impact
-77.5
P2
Stops
48%
P11
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 3●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
0
PTS
0.0 / game
0–3
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
1
TOV
0.3 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
0
FD
rebounding
1
REB
0.3 / game
0
OREB
1
DREB
0.3
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
0
STL+BLK
0.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
29.1
HESI
34.8
PI
0.0
ORtg
77.5
DRtg
-77.5
NRtg
-17.1
Stable NRtg
48%
Stop%
0%
Floor%
0%
eFG%
-2%
PIE
69.2
Team DRtg
-8.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #36
//quick_read
The line at a glance
0.5
PPG
3.3
RPG
0.0
APG
0.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
13%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
0.5
P25
Playmaking
0.0
P11
Rebounding
3.3
P47
True shooting
13%
P18
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
0%
0 made / 6 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 6●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
2
PTS
0.5 / game
0–6
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
3
TOV
0.8 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
13
REB
3.3 / game
5
OREB
8
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
4
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
0%
eFG%
0%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.