ORtg
33.9
21st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Islem Ayari
Combo Guard · TUN · b. 2008
//measurables
178 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.2 stocksDefensive activity · 55th event percentile
3.5 RPGRebounding · 52nd event percentile
- 30.5
- HESI v2.1
- #101
- of 142
- 57%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #101 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
30.5
Event performance
31st event percentile
PI
35.9
Prospect index
29th event percentile
ORtg
33.9
Points / 100 poss.
21st event percentile
DRtg
57.4
Lower is better
75th event percentile
NRtg
-23.5
Two-way margin
36th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 33.9 · 21st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 57.4 · Stop% 81.4% · Team DRtg 62.1
Sample context
6 games · 79 minutes · 57% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
1.2 stocks55th event percentile
Rebounding
3.5 RPG52nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
30.5
31st event percentile
Prospect index
35.9
29th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
33.9
21st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
57.4
75th event percentile
Two-way margin
-23.5
36th event percentile
Stop percentage
81.4%
86th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
1.7 PPG
25th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
45th event percentile
Rebounding
3.5 RPG
52nd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.2 stocks
55th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
21.2% TS
16th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 31st event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 33.9 ORtg and 57.4 DRtg, producing a -23.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and defensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and scoring load.
Relative strengths
- 86th event percentile
Defensive stops
81.4% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 75th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
57.4 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 16th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
21.2% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 21st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
33.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 25th event percentile
Scoring load
1.7 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
1.7 PPG
25th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
21.2%
16th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
16.7%
16th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
14.3%
13th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
10.0%
context1.7 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
16.0%
19th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
45th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
57.4
75th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+4.7
88th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
81.4%
86th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.2 STL+BLK
55th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
27.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-23.5
36th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-17.0
31st event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
30.5
31st event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
35.9
29th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-0.8%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.5 RPG
52nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
78.7
context13.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
56.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#101
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
505.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
1.7
PPG
3.5
RPG
0.8
APG
#101
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#18
RANK
31
FIELD
43%
PERCENTILE
6.5
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#101/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.7
PPG
3.5
RPG
0.8
APG
2.7
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
21%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.7
P25
Playmaking
0.8
P45
Rebounding
3.5
P52
True shooting
21%
P16
Two-way impact
-23.5
P36
Stops
81%
P86
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
14%
3 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
10%
1 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
48% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
10
PTS
1.7 / game
3–21
FGM–FGA
1–10
3PM–3PA
3–6
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
16
TOV
2.7 / game
0.31×
AST:TOV
5
FD
rebounding
21
REB
3.5 / game
2
OREB
19
DREB
3.5
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
5
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
30.5
HESI
35.9
PI
33.9
ORtg
57.4
DRtg
-23.5
NRtg
-17.0
Stable NRtg
81%
Stop%
16%
Floor%
17%
eFG%
-1%
PIE
62.1
Team DRtg
+4.7
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1
Regional · 2026
#18/31view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.5
PPG
5.5
RPG
1.8
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
30%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.5
P53
Playmaking
1.8
P58
Rebounding
5.5
P68
True shooting
30%
P31
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
28%
11 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
13%
2 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
20%
2 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
41% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 16
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
6.5 / game
11–39
FGM–FGA
2–16
3PM–3PA
2–10
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.8 / game
7
TOV
1.8 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
22
REB
5.5 / game
9
OREB
13
DREB
5.5
REB/G
defense
8
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
31%
eFG%
1%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #100Diona Aline BienvenueSF · Cameroonrank_below · #102Hiba ZouhirMorocco
//current_rank
#101
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#99
#100
#102
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
6.5
PPG
5.5
RPG
1.8
APG
2.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
30%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #101
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.7
PPG
3.5
RPG
0.8
APG
2.7
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
21%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.7
P25
Playmaking
0.8
P45
Rebounding
3.5
P52
True shooting
21%
P16
Two-way impact
-23.5
P36
Stops
81%
P86
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
14%
3 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
10%
1 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
48% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 10
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
10
PTS
1.7 / game
3–21
FGM–FGA
1–10
3PM–3PA
3–6
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
16
TOV
2.7 / game
0.31×
AST:TOV
5
FD
rebounding
21
REB
3.5 / game
2
OREB
19
DREB
3.5
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
3
BLK
0.5 / game
5
PF
7
STL+BLK
1.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
30.5
HESI
35.9
PI
33.9
ORtg
57.4
DRtg
-23.5
NRtg
-17.0
Stable NRtg
81%
Stop%
16%
Floor%
17%
eFG%
-1%
PIE
62.1
Team DRtg
+4.7
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 12026
4 GP · event rank #18
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.5
PPG
5.5
RPG
1.8
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
30%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.5
P53
Playmaking
1.8
P58
Rebounding
5.5
P68
True shooting
30%
P31
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
28%
11 made / 39 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
13%
2 made / 16 attempts
FT
Free throws
20%
2 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
41% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 16
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
6.5 / game
11–39
FGM–FGA
2–16
3PM–3PA
2–10
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.8 / game
7
TOV
1.8 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
22
REB
5.5 / game
9
OREB
13
DREB
5.5
REB/G
defense
8
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
10
PF
8
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
31%
eFG%
1%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.