ORtg
104.3
66th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player
Joshua Kelly
Forward · NZL · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 Asia Cup
//measurables
201 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive impact profile
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
54.3% TSScoring efficiency · 71st event percentile
0.8 APGCreation · 39th event percentile
- 73.8
- HESI v2.1
- #50
- of 188
- 53%
- sample weight
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #50 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
73.8
Event performance
74th event percentile
PI
70.5
Prospect index
74th event percentile
ORtg
104.3
Points / 100 poss.
66th event percentile
DRtg
85.4
Lower is better
89th event percentile
NRtg
+19.0
Two-way margin
77th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 104.3 · 66th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 85.4 · Stop% 59.4% · Team DRtg 84.8
Sample context
6 games · 67 minutes · 53% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive impact profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
54.3% TS71st event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG39th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
- 03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
73.8
74th event percentile
Prospect index
70.5
74th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
104.3
66th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
85.4
89th event percentile
Two-way margin
+19.0
77th event percentile
Stop percentage
59.4%
74th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.8 PPG
35th event percentile
Creation
0.8 APG
39th event percentile
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
36th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 stocks
37th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
54.3% TS
71st event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 74th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 104.3 ORtg and 85.4 DRtg, producing a +19.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, rebounding, and defensive activity.
Relative strengths
- 89th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
85.4 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 77th event percentile
Two-way margin
+19.0 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 74th event percentile
Defensive stops
59.4% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Relative weaknesses
- 35th event percentile
Scoring load
3.8 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 36th event percentile
Rebounding
2.0 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 37th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.7 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.8 PPG
35th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
54.3%
71st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
60.0%
85th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
60.0%
93rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.2 attempts per game
Free throws
35.7%
16th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
54.6%
83rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.8 APG
39th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
85.4
89th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.5
59th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
59.4%
74th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.7 STL+BLK
37th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
15.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+19.0
77th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+6.3
74th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
73.8
74th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
70.5
74th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.0%
47th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.0 RPG
36th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
67.4
context11.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
52.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#50
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
466.8
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
film_room
Tape & footage
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs Vs Japan · 2026-09-23 · scout: Ahmed Tareq
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source03
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Ahmed Tareq
Report date: 2026-09-23
verified_human_evaluation
Basketball verdict
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · expanded closeout attacker · expanded screen-and-roll finisher · expanded short-roll connector
forward · expanded closeout attacker · expanded screen-and-roll finisher · expanded short-roll connector. Best current separators: Finishing, Closeout attack, Screening, Post play.
Now · ForwardProjects · Forward
Translatable strengths
- · Finishing
- · Closeout attack
- · Screening
- · Post play
Exploitable weaknesses
Not confirmed in this report.
Offensive translation
Can take on more closeout attacker responsibility at the target level. Can take on more screen-and-roll finisher responsibility at the target level. Can take on more short-roll connector responsibility at the target level. Projects to retain a primary role as a post / mismatch option.
Defensive assignments
primary gap / nail helper (grade 3.5; assignment confirmed; workload can expand). primary post matchup defender (grade 5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary rim protector (grade 5; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). regular low-man / back-line rotator (grade 4; assignment confirmed; workload can expand).
Best offensive fit
Possible fit: Adds value in movement and spacing actions without dominating the ball. Representative film is still required.
Best defensive fit
Possible fit: Fits a connected help defense that values early positioning, tags and recoveries. Assignment-confirmed film is still required.
Limiting environments
A role with little movement, relocation or catch-ready shooting responsibility. A perimeter-only role that removes screening and interior gravity.
Development priorities
No priority confirmed yet.
evidence_and_projection
Why the verdict holds
evidence_strength
strong
Limited representative evidence attached
pathway_hypothesis
MM D1
Mid-major NCAA Division I hypothesis · experimental uncalibrated
Experimental · not outcome-calibrated
hesi_reconciliation
Scout view × current production
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive73.8 performance rating · rank 50 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 104.3 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive54.6% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive59.4% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Limited representative evidence attached
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
3.8
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.8
APG
#50
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#50/188Event board →
6
GP
3.8
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.8
APG
event_context
Event context
FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 · 188 ranked players
rank_above · #49Vitaliy ShmikPF · KAZrank_below · #51Abdulla MousaPG · QAT
//current_rank
#50
of 188 ranked
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#48
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
3.8
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.8
APG
0.7
SPG
0.0
BPG
0%
3P%
54%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #50
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.8
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.8
APG
0.7
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
54%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.8
P35
Playmaking
0.8
P39
Rebounding
2.0
P36
True shooting
54%
P71
Two-way impact
+19.0
P77
Stops
59%
P74
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
60%
9 made / 15 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
FT
Free throws
36%
5 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
7% of attempts from three
●2PA 14●3PA 1
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
23
PTS
3.8 / game
9–15
FGM–FGA
0–1
3PM–3PA
5–14
FTM–FTA
creation
5
AST
0.8 / game
4
TOV
0.7 / game
1.25×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
12
REB
2.0 / game
4
OREB
8
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
9
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
73.8
HESI
70.5
PI
104.3
ORtg
85.4
DRtg
+19.0
NRtg
+6.3
Stable NRtg
59%
Stop%
55%
Floor%
60%
eFG%
2%
PIE
84.8
Team DRtg
-0.5
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.