ORtg
121.8
85th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Point Guard · QAT · b. 2008
//measurables
188 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
32.8 PPGScoring load · 99th event percentile
61.4% TSScoring efficiency · 86th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #51 of 188 · Provisional
HESI
73.3
Event performance
73rd event percentile
PI
70.1
Prospect index
73rd event percentile
ORtg
121.8
Points / 100 poss.
85th event percentile
DRtg
110.3
Lower is better
27th event percentile
NRtg
+11.5
Two-way margin
70th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 121.8 · 85th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 110.3 · Stop% 40.6% · Team DRtg 105.6
Sample context
4 games · 138 minutes · 70% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Scoring efficiency
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
73.3
73rd event percentile
Prospect index
70.1
73rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
121.8
85th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
110.3
27th event percentile
Two-way margin
+11.5
70th event percentile
Stop percentage
40.6%
24th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
32.8 PPG
99th event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
45th event percentile
Rebounding
4.0 RPG
66th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.5 stocks
66th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
61.4% TS
86th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Scorer
32.8 PPG · 100th event percentile
Event Efficiency
61% TS on 32.8 PPG · 86th event percentile
Offensive Impact
121.8 ORtg · 85th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 73rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 121.8 ORtg and 110.3 DRtg, producing a +11.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, scoring efficiency, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops and defensive efficiency.
Scoring load
32.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Scoring efficiency
61.4% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Offensive efficiency
121.8 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Defensive stops
40.6% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive efficiency
110.3 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
121.8
85th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
32.8 PPG
99th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
61.4%
86th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
56.7%
79th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
49.4%
81st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
31.7%
context10.3 attempts per game
Free throws
75.0%
66th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
55.2%
84th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
45th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
110.3
27th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
105.6
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-4.7
30th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
40.6%
24th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.5 STL+BLK
66th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
22.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+11.5
70th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+5.6
73rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
73.3
73rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
70.1
73rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
15.8%
95th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.0 RPG
66th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
137.6
context34.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#51
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
317.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
4
GP
32.8
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.0
APG
#51
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
32.8
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.0
APG
2.0
TOV/G
3.3
3PM/G
61%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
32.8
P100
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
4.0
P66
True shooting
61%
P86
Two-way impact
+11.5
P70
Stops
41%
P24
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
49%
44 made / 89 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
32%
13 made / 41 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
30 made / 40 attempts
Shot selection
46% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
131
PTS
32.8 / game
44–89
FGM–FGA
13–41
3PM–3PA
30–40
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.0 / game
8
TOV
2.0 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
30
FD
rebounding
16
REB
4.0 / game
5
OREB
11
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
4
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
73.3
HESI
70.1
PI
121.8
ORtg
110.3
DRtg
+11.5
NRtg
+5.6
Stable NRtg
41%
Stop%
55%
Floor%
57%
eFG%
16%
PIE
105.6
Team DRtg
-4.7
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
32.8
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.0
APG
1.3
SPG
0.3
BPG
32%
3P%
61%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
4 GP · event rank #51
//quick_read
32.8
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.0
APG
2.0
TOV/G
3.3
3PM/G
61%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
32.8
P100
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
4.0
P66
True shooting
61%
P86
Two-way impact
+11.5
P70
Stops
41%
P24
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
49%
44 made / 89 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
32%
13 made / 41 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
30 made / 40 attempts
Shot selection
46% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
131
PTS
32.8 / game
44–89
FGM–FGA
13–41
3PM–3PA
30–40
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.0 / game
8
TOV
2.0 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
30
FD
rebounding
16
REB
4.0 / game
5
OREB
11
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
5
STL
1.3 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
4
PF
6
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
73.3
HESI
70.1
PI
121.8
ORtg
110.3
DRtg
+11.5
NRtg
+5.6
Stable NRtg
41%
Stop%
55%
Floor%
57%
eFG%
16%
PIE
105.6
Team DRtg
-4.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.