back_to_rankings
Abdulla Mousa portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Abdulla Mousa

Point Guard · QAT · b. 2008

//measurables

188 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Efficient scoring profile

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalScorer32.8 PPG · 100th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency61% TS on 32.8 PPG · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalOffensive Impact121.8 ORtg · 85th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

32.8 PPGScoring load · 99th event percentile

61.4% TSScoring efficiency · 86th event percentile

73.3
HESI v2.1
#51
of 188
70%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #51 of 188 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

73.3

Event performance

73rd event percentile

PI

70.1

Prospect index

73rd event percentile

ORtg

121.8

Points / 100 poss.

85th event percentile

DRtg

110.3

Lower is better

27th event percentile

NRtg

+11.5

Two-way margin

70th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 121.8 · 85th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 110.3 · Stop% 40.6% · Team DRtg 105.6

Sample context

4 games · 138 minutes · 70% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description

Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring load

32.8 PPG99th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

61.4% TS86th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

  3. 03

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

73.3

73rd event percentile

Prospect index

70.1

73rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

121.8

85th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

110.3

27th event percentile

Two-way margin

+11.5

70th event percentile

Stop percentage

40.6%

24th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

32.8 PPG

99th event percentile

Creation

1.0 APG

45th event percentile

Rebounding

4.0 RPG

66th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.5 stocks

66th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

61.4% TS

86th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P100

    Scorer

    32.8 PPG · 100th event percentile

  • P86

    Event Efficiency

    61% TS on 32.8 PPG · 86th event percentile

  • P85

    Offensive Impact

    121.8 ORtg · 85th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 73rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 121.8 ORtg and 110.3 DRtg, producing a +11.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, scoring efficiency, and offensive efficiency. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Scoring load

    32.8 PPG

    99th event percentile

    Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

  2. Scoring efficiency

    61.4% TS

    86th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

  3. Offensive efficiency

    121.8 ORtg

    85th event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive stops

    40.6% Stop%

    24th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    110.3 DRtg

    27th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

121.8

85th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

32.8 PPG

99th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

61.4%

86th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

56.7%

79th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

49.4%

81st event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

31.7%

context

10.3 attempts per game

Free throws

75.0%

66th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

55.2%

84th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.0 APG

45th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

110.3

27th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

105.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.7

30th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

40.6%

24th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.5 STL+BLK

66th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

22.2

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+11.5

70th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+5.6

73rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

73.3

73rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

70.1

73rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

15.8%

95th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

4.0 RPG

66th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

4

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

137.6

context

34.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

69.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#51

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

317.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

4

GP

32.8

PPG

4.0

RPG

1.0

APG

#51

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#51/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

32.8

PPG

4.0

RPG

1.0

APG

2.0

TOV/G

3.3

3PM/G

61%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

32.8

P100

Playmaking

1.0

P45

Rebounding

4.0

P66

True shooting

61%

P86

Two-way impact

+11.5

P70

Stops

41%

P24

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

49%

44 made / 89 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

32%

13 made / 41 attempts

FT

Free throws

75%

30 made / 40 attempts

Shot selection

46% of attempts from three

2PA 483PA 41

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

131

PTS

32.8 / game

44–89

FGM–FGA

13–41

3PM–3PA

30–40

FTM–FTA

creation

4

AST

1.0 / game

8

TOV

2.0 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

30

FD

rebounding

16

REB

4.0 / game

5

OREB

11

DREB

4.0

REB/G

defense

5

STL

1.3 / game

1

BLK

0.3 / game

4

PF

6

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

73.3

HESI

70.1

PI

121.8

ORtg

110.3

DRtg

+11.5

NRtg

+5.6

Stable NRtg

41%

Stop%

55%

Floor%

57%

eFG%

16%

PIE

105.6

Team DRtg

-4.7

Def. lift

sample_context

4 games138 minutes34.4 min/game70% sample weightrank #51 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Vitaliy Shmik portrait#49

    Vitaliy Shmik

    Power Forward · KAZ

    3.7 PPG 1.7 RPG 0.7 APG

  • Joshua Kelly portrait#50

    Joshua Kelly

    Forward · NZL

    3.8 PPG 2.0 RPG 0.8 APG

  • Yuxiu Chen portrait#52

    Yuxiu Chen

    Guard · CHN

    5.5 PPG 2.7 RPG 4.8 APG

    //event_signalShooter38% 3PT on 2.7 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

32.8

PPG

4.0

RPG

1.0

APG

1.3

SPG

0.3

BPG

32%

3P%

61%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

4 GP · event rank #51

//quick_read

The line at a glance

32.8

PPG

4.0

RPG

1.0

APG

2.0

TOV/G

3.3

3PM/G

61%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

32.8

P100

Playmaking

1.0

P45

Rebounding

4.0

P66

True shooting

61%

P86

Two-way impact

+11.5

P70

Stops

41%

P24

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

49%

44 made / 89 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

32%

13 made / 41 attempts

FT

Free throws

75%

30 made / 40 attempts

Shot selection

46% of attempts from three

2PA 483PA 41

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

131

PTS

32.8 / game

44–89

FGM–FGA

13–41

3PM–3PA

30–40

FTM–FTA

creation

4

AST

1.0 / game

8

TOV

2.0 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

30

FD

rebounding

16

REB

4.0 / game

5

OREB

11

DREB

4.0

REB/G

defense

5

STL

1.3 / game

1

BLK

0.3 / game

4

PF

6

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

73.3

HESI

70.1

PI

121.8

ORtg

110.3

DRtg

+11.5

NRtg

+5.6

Stable NRtg

41%

Stop%

55%

Floor%

57%

eFG%

16%

PIE

105.6

Team DRtg

-4.7

Def. lift

sample_context

4 games138 minutes34.4 min/game70% sample weightrank #51 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.