back_to_rankings
Yuxiu Chen portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026

Yuxiu Chen

Combo Guard · CHN · b. 2009

//measurables

185 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalCreator4.8 APG · 94th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalShooter38% 3PT on 2.7 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

4.8 APGCreation · 94th event percentile

49.6% TSScoring efficiency · 59th event percentile

72.7
HESI v2.1
#52
of 188
62%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

Rank #52 of 188 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

72.7

Event performance

73rd event percentile

PI

69.7

Prospect index

73rd event percentile

ORtg

105.6

Points / 100 poss.

69th event percentile

DRtg

92.9

Lower is better

76th event percentile

NRtg

+12.6

Two-way margin

71st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 105.6 · 69th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 92.9 · Stop% 48.2% · Team DRtg 88.8

Sample context

6 games · 100 minutes · 62% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

4.8 APG94th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

49.6% TS59th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

  3. 03

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

72.7

73rd event percentile

Prospect index

69.7

73rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

105.6

69th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

92.9

76th event percentile

Two-way margin

+12.6

71st event percentile

Stop percentage

48.2%

44th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.5 PPG

46th event percentile

Creation

4.8 APG

94th event percentile

Rebounding

2.7 RPG

49th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.5 stocks

32nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

49.6% TS

59th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P94

    Creator

    4.8 APG · 94th event percentile

  • Shooter

    38% 3PT on 2.7 3PA/G

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 73rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 105.6 ORtg and 92.9 DRtg, producing a +12.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, defensive efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative area is defensive activity.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    4.8 APG

    94th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

  2. Defensive efficiency

    92.9 DRtg

    76th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  3. Two-way margin

    +12.6 NRtg

    71st event percentile

    The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive activity

    0.5 steals + blocks/G

    32nd event percentile

    Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

105.6

69th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.5 PPG

46th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

49.6%

59th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

42.9%

46th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

32.1%

32nd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

37.5%

context

2.7 attempts per game

Free throws

75.0%

66th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

44.8%

59th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

4.8 APG

94th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

92.9

76th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

88.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.1

34th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

48.2%

44th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.5 STL+BLK

32nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

19.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+12.6

71st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+4.9

73rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

72.7

73rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

69.7

73rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

4.5%

68th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.7 RPG

49th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

6

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

99.9

context

16.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

62.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#52

context

Among 188 published players.

Team possessions

491.9

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

6

GP

5.5

PPG

2.7

RPG

4.8

APG

#52

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup

Continental · 2026

#52/188view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.5

PPG

2.7

RPG

4.8

APG

2.2

TOV/G

1.0

3PM/G

50%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.5

P46

Playmaking

4.8

P94

Rebounding

2.7

P49

True shooting

50%

P59

Two-way impact

+12.6

P71

Stops

48%

P44

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

32%

9 made / 28 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

38%

6 made / 16 attempts

FT

Free throws

75%

9 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

57% of attempts from three

2PA 123PA 16

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

33

PTS

5.5 / game

9–28

FGM–FGA

6–16

3PM–3PA

9–12

FTM–FTA

creation

29

AST

4.8 / game

13

TOV

2.2 / game

2.23×

AST:TOV

9

FD

rebounding

16

REB

2.7 / game

3

OREB

13

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

3

STL

0.5 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

7

PF

3

STL+BLK

0.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

72.7

HESI

69.7

PI

105.6

ORtg

92.9

DRtg

+12.6

NRtg

+4.9

Stable NRtg

48%

Stop%

45%

Floor%

43%

eFG%

5%

PIE

88.8

Team DRtg

-4.1

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games100 minutes16.7 min/game62% sample weightrank #52 of 188
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.

  • Yahya Basaran portrait#1

    Yahya Basaran

    Center · AUS

    15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG

    //event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Joshua Kelly portrait#50

    Joshua Kelly

    Forward · NZL

    3.8 PPG 2.0 RPG 0.8 APG

  • Abdulla Mousa portrait#51

    Abdulla Mousa

    Point Guard · QAT

    32.8 PPG 4.0 RPG 1.0 APG

    //event_signalScorer32.8 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency61% TS on 32.8 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Chunzhi Zhang portrait#53

    Chunzhi Zhang

    Forward · CHN

    10.8 PPG 3.3 RPG 1.5 APG

    //event_signalShooter47% 3PT on 3.2 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

5.5

PPG

2.7

RPG

4.8

APG

0.5

SPG

0.0

BPG

38%

3P%

50%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026

6 GP · event rank #52

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.5

PPG

2.7

RPG

4.8

APG

2.2

TOV/G

1.0

3PM/G

50%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.5

P46

Playmaking

4.8

P94

Rebounding

2.7

P49

True shooting

50%

P59

Two-way impact

+12.6

P71

Stops

48%

P44

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

32%

9 made / 28 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

38%

6 made / 16 attempts

FT

Free throws

75%

9 made / 12 attempts

Shot selection

57% of attempts from three

2PA 123PA 16

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

33

PTS

5.5 / game

9–28

FGM–FGA

6–16

3PM–3PA

9–12

FTM–FTA

creation

29

AST

4.8 / game

13

TOV

2.2 / game

2.23×

AST:TOV

9

FD

rebounding

16

REB

2.7 / game

3

OREB

13

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

3

STL

0.5 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

7

PF

3

STL+BLK

0.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

72.7

HESI

69.7

PI

105.6

ORtg

92.9

DRtg

+12.6

NRtg

+4.9

Stable NRtg

48%

Stop%

45%

Floor%

43%

eFG%

5%

PIE

88.8

Team DRtg

-4.1

Def. lift

sample_context

6 games100 minutes16.7 min/game62% sample weightrank #52 of 188

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.