ORtg
101.0
61st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026
Chunzhi Zhang
Forward · CHN · b. 2009
//measurables
196 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileEfficient scoring profile
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalShooter47% 3PT on 3.2 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
10.8 PPGScoring load · 82nd event percentile
57.7% TSScoring efficiency · 80th event percentile
- 72.2
- HESI v2.1
- #53
- of 188
- 67%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #53 of 188 · Established
HESI
72.2
Event performance
72nd event percentile
PI
69.3
Prospect index
72nd event percentile
ORtg
101.0
Points / 100 poss.
61st event percentile
DRtg
89.9
Lower is better
81st event percentile
NRtg
+11.2
Two-way margin
70th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 101.0 · 61st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 89.9 · Stop% 55.4% · Team DRtg 88.8
Sample context
6 games · 123 minutes · 67% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
10.8 PPG82nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
57.7% TS80th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
72.2
72nd event percentile
Prospect index
69.3
72nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
101.0
61st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
89.9
81st event percentile
Two-way margin
+11.2
70th event percentile
Stop percentage
55.4%
65th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
10.8 PPG
82nd event percentile
Creation
1.5 APG
61st event percentile
Rebounding
3.3 RPG
59th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.5 stocks
71st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
57.7% TS
80th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Shooter
47% 3PT on 3.2 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 72nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 101.0 ORtg and 89.9 DRtg, producing a +11.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, defensive efficiency, and scoring efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 82nd event percentile
Scoring load
10.8 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 81st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
89.9 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
- 80th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
57.7% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
10.8 PPG
82nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
57.7%
80th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
53.1%
74th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
43.8%
68th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
47.4%
context3.2 attempts per game
Free throws
73.7%
61st event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
44.2%
57th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.5 APG
61st event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
89.9
81st event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.8
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.0
57th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
55.4%
65th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.5 STL+BLK
71st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
27.9
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+11.2
70th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+4.9
72nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
72.2
72nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
69.3
72nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.3%
77th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.3 RPG
59th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
122.8
context20.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
67.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#53
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
491.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
6
GP
10.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.5
APG
#53
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
#53/188view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.5
APG
2.5
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.8
P82
Playmaking
1.5
P61
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
58%
P80
Two-way impact
+11.2
P70
Stops
55%
P65
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
21 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
47%
9 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
74%
14 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
40% of attempts from three
●2PA 29●3PA 19
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
65
PTS
10.8 / game
21–48
FGM–FGA
9–19
3PM–3PA
14–19
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
0.60×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
20
REB
3.3 / game
5
OREB
15
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
8
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
72.2
HESI
69.3
PI
101.0
ORtg
89.9
DRtg
+11.2
NRtg
+4.9
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
44%
Floor%
53%
eFG%
5%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
-1.0
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
rank_above · #52Yuxiu ChenG · CHNrank_below · #54CARTER MATTHEW COLEMANPF · TPE, USA
//current_rank
#53
of 188 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
#1
Center · AUS
15.7 PPG 10.7 RPG 1.2 APG
//event_signalRebounder10.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection2.8 BPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#51
Point Guard · QAT
32.8 PPG 4.0 RPG 1.0 APG
//event_signalScorer32.8 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalEvent Efficiency61% TS on 32.8 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#52
Guard · CHN
5.5 PPG 2.7 RPG 4.8 APG
//event_signalShooter38% 3PT on 2.7 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#54
Power Forward · TPE, USA
18.9 PPG 8.4 RPG 1.7 APG
//event_signalScorer18.9 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
10.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.5
APG
1.2
SPG
0.3
BPG
47%
3P%
58%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #53
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.8
PPG
3.3
RPG
1.5
APG
2.5
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.8
P82
Playmaking
1.5
P61
Rebounding
3.3
P59
True shooting
58%
P80
Two-way impact
+11.2
P70
Stops
55%
P65
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
44%
21 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
47%
9 made / 19 attempts
FT
Free throws
74%
14 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
40% of attempts from three
●2PA 29●3PA 19
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
65
PTS
10.8 / game
21–48
FGM–FGA
9–19
3PM–3PA
14–19
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
0.60×
AST:TOV
12
FD
rebounding
20
REB
3.3 / game
5
OREB
15
DREB
3.3
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
8
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
72.2
HESI
69.3
PI
101.0
ORtg
89.9
DRtg
+11.2
NRtg
+4.9
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
44%
Floor%
53%
eFG%
5%
PIE
88.8
Team DRtg
-1.0
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.