ORtg
111.9
74th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Power Forward · TPE, USA · b. 2009
//measurables
203 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
18.9 PPGScoring load · 97th event percentile
8.4 RPGRebounding · 95th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
Rank #54 of 188 · High confidence
HESI
71.7
Event performance
72nd event percentile
PI
68.8
Prospect index
72nd event percentile
ORtg
111.9
Points / 100 poss.
74th event percentile
DRtg
104.8
Lower is better
39th event percentile
NRtg
+7.0
Two-way margin
69th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 111.9 · 74th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 104.8 · Stop% 51.4% · Team DRtg 105.2
Sample context
7 games · 218 minutes · 78% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
Rebounding
Questions for film
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
71.7
72nd event percentile
Prospect index
68.8
72nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
111.9
74th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
104.8
39th event percentile
Two-way margin
+7.0
69th event percentile
Stop percentage
51.4%
55th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
18.9 PPG
97th event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
70th event percentile
Rebounding
8.4 RPG
95th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.6 stocks
72nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
56.6% TS
76th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Scorer
18.9 PPG · 97th event percentile
Rebounder
8.4 RPG · 95th event percentile
Activity
8.4 RPG + 1.6 defensive plays/G · 80th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 72nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 111.9 ORtg and 104.8 DRtg, producing a +7.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, rebounding, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative area is defensive efficiency.
Scoring load
18.9 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Rebounding
8.4 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring efficiency
56.6% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
Defensive efficiency
104.8 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
111.9
74th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
18.9 PPG
97th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
56.6%
76th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
52.0%
73rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
47.1%
78th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
29.4%
context4.9 attempts per game
Free throws
78.8%
72nd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
51.3%
77th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.7 APG
70th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
104.8
39th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
105.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.4
65th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
51.4%
55th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.6 STL+BLK
72nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
49.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+7.0
69th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+3.8
72nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
71.7
72nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
68.8
72nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
11.1%
99th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.4 RPG
95th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
217.8
context31.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
78.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
High confidence
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#54
contextAmong 188 published players.
Team possessions
617.7
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
7
GP
18.9
PPG
8.4
RPG
1.7
APG
#54
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
18.9
PPG
8.4
RPG
1.7
APG
2.0
TOV/G
1.4
3PM/G
57%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
18.9
P97
Playmaking
1.7
P70
Rebounding
8.4
P95
True shooting
57%
P76
Two-way impact
+7.0
P69
Stops
51%
P55
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
47%
48 made / 102 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
10 made / 34 attempts
FT
Free throws
79%
26 made / 33 attempts
Shot selection
33% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
132
PTS
18.9 / game
48–102
FGM–FGA
10–34
3PM–3PA
26–33
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
1.7 / game
14
TOV
2.0 / game
0.86×
AST:TOV
29
FD
rebounding
59
REB
8.4 / game
16
OREB
43
DREB
8.4
REB/G
defense
6
STL
0.9 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
11
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
71.7
HESI
68.8
PI
111.9
ORtg
104.8
DRtg
+7.0
NRtg
+3.8
Stable NRtg
51%
Stop%
51%
Floor%
52%
eFG%
11%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
+0.4
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026 — 188 ranked players.
//current_rank
#54
of 188 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 Asia Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
18.9
PPG
8.4
RPG
1.7
APG
0.9
SPG
0.7
BPG
29%
3P%
57%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 Asia Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #54
//quick_read
18.9
PPG
8.4
RPG
1.7
APG
2.0
TOV/G
1.4
3PM/G
57%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
18.9
P97
Playmaking
1.7
P70
Rebounding
8.4
P95
True shooting
57%
P76
Two-way impact
+7.0
P69
Stops
51%
P55
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
47%
48 made / 102 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
29%
10 made / 34 attempts
FT
Free throws
79%
26 made / 33 attempts
Shot selection
33% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
132
PTS
18.9 / game
48–102
FGM–FGA
10–34
3PM–3PA
26–33
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
1.7 / game
14
TOV
2.0 / game
0.86×
AST:TOV
29
FD
rebounding
59
REB
8.4 / game
16
OREB
43
DREB
8.4
REB/G
defense
6
STL
0.9 / game
5
BLK
0.7 / game
11
PF
11
STL+BLK
1.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
71.7
HESI
68.8
PI
111.9
ORtg
104.8
DRtg
+7.0
NRtg
+3.8
Stable NRtg
51%
Stop%
51%
Floor%
52%
eFG%
11%
PIE
105.2
Team DRtg
+0.4
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.