ORtg
76.9
79th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Zeina Amin
EGY · b. 2009
//measurables
192 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
42.8% TSScoring efficiency · 81st event percentile
6.0 PPGScoring load · 71st event percentile
- 78.7
- HESI v2.1
- #31
- of 142
- 64%
- sample weight
Performance
2 rated events
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #31 of 142 · Established
HESI
78.7
Event performance
79th event percentile
PI
75.7
Prospect index
79th event percentile
ORtg
76.9
Points / 100 poss.
79th event percentile
DRtg
58.9
Lower is better
69th event percentile
NRtg
+18.0
Two-way margin
74th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 76.9 · 79th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 58.9 · Stop% 66.7% · Team DRtg 56.7
Sample context
6 games · 106 minutes · 64% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
42.8% TS81st event percentile
Scoring load
6.0 PPG71st event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
78.7
79th event percentile
Prospect index
75.7
79th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
76.9
79th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
58.9
69th event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.0
74th event percentile
Stop percentage
66.7%
55th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
6.0 PPG
71st event percentile
Creation
1.3 APG
64th event percentile
Rebounding
4.5 RPG
66th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.3 stocks
59th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
42.8% TS
81st event percentile
//rated_event_history
Every rated competition
Records are shown side by side, not as one trend line. Each event has a different player pool and competition context.
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 79th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 76.9 ORtg and 58.9 DRtg, producing a +18.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 81st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
42.8% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 79th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
76.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 74th event percentile
Two-way margin
+18.0 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
6.0 PPG
71st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
42.8%
81st event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.9%
91st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
42.9%
95th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
37.5%
27th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
39.8%
86th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.3 APG
64th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
58.9
69th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
56.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-2.3
44th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
66.7%
55th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.3 STL+BLK
59th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
31.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+18.0
74th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+8.4
79th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
78.7
79th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
75.7
79th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
4.3%
71st event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.5 RPG
66th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
106.0
context17.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
63.9%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#31
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
538.4
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
8.9
PPG
6.6
RPG
1.6
APG
#24
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#24/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.9
PPG
6.6
RPG
1.6
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.9
P80
Playmaking
1.6
P62
Rebounding
6.6
P90
True shooting
52%
P86
Two-way impact
+26.9
P85
Stops
72%
P86
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
22 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
58%
18 made / 31 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 46●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
62
PTS
8.9 / game
22–46
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
18–31
FTM–FTA
creation
11
AST
1.6 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
1.22×
AST:TOV
20
FD
rebounding
46
REB
6.6 / game
20
OREB
26
DREB
6.6
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.0 / game
11
BLK
1.6 / game
23
PF
18
STL+BLK
2.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
88.0
HESI
84.9
PI
104.1
ORtg
77.3
DRtg
+26.9
NRtg
+19.1
Stable NRtg
72%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
9%
PIE
81.3
Team DRtg
+4.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#31/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.0
PPG
4.5
RPG
1.3
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.0
P71
Playmaking
1.3
P64
Rebounding
4.5
P66
True shooting
43%
P81
Two-way impact
+18.0
P74
Stops
67%
P55
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
43%
15 made / 35 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
38%
6 made / 16 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 35●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
36
PTS
6.0 / game
15–35
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
6–16
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.3 / game
11
TOV
1.8 / game
0.73×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
7
OREB
20
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
4
BLK
0.7 / game
16
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
78.7
HESI
75.7
PI
76.9
ORtg
58.9
DRtg
+18.0
NRtg
+8.4
Stable NRtg
67%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
4%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
-2.3
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #23Matilda TroutAUSrank_below · #25Ashley Vande VenCanada
//current_rank
#24
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#22
CHN
10.0 PPG 9.7 RPG 0.9 APG
//event_signalRebounder9.7 RPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity9.7 RPG + 2.6 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#23
#25
Canada
10.6 PPG 7.4 RPG 0.9 APG
//event_signalShooter35% 3PT on 5.7 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
8.9
PPG
6.6
RPG
1.6
APG
1.0
SPG
1.6
BPG
—
3P%
52%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #24
//quick_read
The line at a glance
8.9
PPG
6.6
RPG
1.6
APG
1.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
52%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
8.9
P80
Playmaking
1.6
P62
Rebounding
6.6
P90
True shooting
52%
P86
Two-way impact
+26.9
P85
Stops
72%
P86
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
48%
22 made / 46 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
58%
18 made / 31 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 46●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
62
PTS
8.9 / game
22–46
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
18–31
FTM–FTA
creation
11
AST
1.6 / game
9
TOV
1.3 / game
1.22×
AST:TOV
20
FD
rebounding
46
REB
6.6 / game
20
OREB
26
DREB
6.6
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.0 / game
11
BLK
1.6 / game
23
PF
18
STL+BLK
2.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
88.0
HESI
84.9
PI
104.1
ORtg
77.3
DRtg
+26.9
NRtg
+19.1
Stable NRtg
72%
Stop%
53%
Floor%
48%
eFG%
9%
PIE
81.3
Team DRtg
+4.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #31
//quick_read
The line at a glance
6.0
PPG
4.5
RPG
1.3
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
6.0
P71
Playmaking
1.3
P64
Rebounding
4.5
P66
True shooting
43%
P81
Two-way impact
+18.0
P74
Stops
67%
P55
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
43%
15 made / 35 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
38%
6 made / 16 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 35●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
36
PTS
6.0 / game
15–35
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
6–16
FTM–FTA
creation
8
AST
1.3 / game
11
TOV
1.8 / game
0.73×
AST:TOV
10
FD
rebounding
27
REB
4.5 / game
7
OREB
20
DREB
4.5
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
4
BLK
0.7 / game
16
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
78.7
HESI
75.7
PI
76.9
ORtg
58.9
DRtg
+18.0
NRtg
+8.4
Stable NRtg
67%
Stop%
40%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
4%
PIE
56.7
Team DRtg
-2.3
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.