Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Pauline Achieng Acholla

KEN · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led profile

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.8 APGCreation · 76th event percentile

1.7 stocksDefensive activity · 42nd event percentile

14.2
HESI v2.1: #121
of 142: 56%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #121 of 142 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

14.2

Event performance

14th event percentile

24.0

Prospect index

15th event percentile

ORtg

30.3

Points / 100 poss.

15th event percentile

DRtg

68.6

Lower is better

38th event percentile

NRtg

-38.2

Two-way margin

20th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 30.3 · 15th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 68.6 · Stop% 68.8% · Team DRtg 69.2

Sample context

6 games · 78 minutes · 56% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led profileevent-relative description

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

1.8 APG76th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks42nd event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

14.2

14th event percentile

Prospect index

24.0

15th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

30.3

15th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

68.6

38th event percentile

Two-way margin

-38.2

20th event percentile

Stop percentage

68.8%

64th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.2 PPG

17th event percentile

Creation

1.8 APG

76th event percentile

Rebounding

2.2 RPG

34th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.7 stocks

42nd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

14.2% TS

10th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 14th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 30.3 ORtg and 68.6 DRtg, producing a -38.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and scoring load.

Relative strengths

Creation
1.8 APG
76th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring efficiency
14.2% TS
10th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Offensive efficiency
30.3 ORtg
15th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Scoring load
1.2 PPG
17th event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

30.3

15th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.2 PPG

17th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

14.2%

10th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

6.8%

8th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

4.5%

6th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

5.9%

context

2.8 attempts per game

Free throws

66.7%

80th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

13.7%

14th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.8 APG

76th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

68.6

38th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

69.2

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.7

72nd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

68.8%

64th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.7 STL+BLK

42nd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

25.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-38.2

20th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-25.3

14th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

14.2

14th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

24.0

15th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-2.8%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.2 RPG

34th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

77.5

context

12.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

56.4%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#121

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

579.1

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

1.2

PPG

2.2

RPG

1.8

APG

#121

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#33

RANK

FIELD

32%

PERCENTILE

4.6

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#121/142Event board →

1.2

PPG

2.2

RPG

1.8

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#33/48Event board →

4.6

PPG

2.4

RPG

3.0

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

rank_above · #120Suzy Elvira GongaultCentral African Republic

//current_rank

#121

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #122Elona Le BretMorocco

#1
Couda Keita
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
#119
A'Maria Pegues
Uganda
1.2 PPG 3.6 RPG 0.6 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4.6

PPG

2.4

RPG

3.0

APG

1.6

SPG

0.0

BPG

—

3P%

31%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #121

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.2

PPG

2.2

RPG

1.8

APG

2.5

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

14%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.2

P17

Playmaking

1.8

P76

Rebounding

2.2

P34

True shooting

14%

P10

Two-way impact

-38.2

P20

Stops

69%

P64

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

1 made / 22 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

1 made / 17 attempts

Free throws

67%

4 made / 6 attempts

Shot selection

77% of attempts from three

●2PA 5●3PA 17

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

1.2 / game

1–22

FGM–FGA

1–17

3PM–3PA

4–6

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.8 / game

TOV

2.5 / game

0.73×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.2 / game

OREB

DREB

2.2

REB/G

defense

STL

1.7 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

14.2

HESI

24.0

30.3

ORtg

68.6

DRtg

-38.2

NRtg

-25.3

Stable NRtg

69%

Stop%

14%

Floor%

eFG%

-3%

PIE

69.2

Team DRtg

+0.7

Def. lift

FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026

5 GP · event rank #33

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.6

PPG

2.4

RPG

3.0

APG

5.8

TOV/G

0.8

3PM/G

31%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.6

P54

Playmaking

3.0

P84

Rebounding

2.4

P35

True shooting

31%

P47

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

22%

7 made / 32 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

18%

4 made / 22 attempts

Free throws

45%

5 made / 11 attempts

Shot selection

69% of attempts from three

●2PA 10●3PA 22

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

4.6 / game

7–32

FGM–FGA

4–22

3PM–3PA

5–11

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

3.0 / game

TOV

5.8 / game

0.52×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

2.4 / game

OREB

DREB

2.4

REB/G

defense

STL

1.6 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

28%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.