ORtg
41.9
31st event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Suzy Elvira Gongault
CAF · b. 2008
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load-led profile
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalScorer10.2 PPG · 89th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
10.2 PPGScoring load · 89th event percentile
3.8 stocksDefensive activity · 76th event percentile
- 16.3
- HESI v2.1
- #120
- of 142
- 71%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #120 of 142 · Established
HESI
16.3
Event performance
17th event percentile
PI
24.6
Prospect index
16th event percentile
ORtg
41.9
Points / 100 poss.
31st event percentile
DRtg
73.2
Lower is better
24th event percentile
NRtg
-31.3
Two-way margin
27th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 41.9 · 31st event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 73.2 · Stop% 62.7% · Team DRtg 72.5
Sample context
5 games · 144 minutes · 71% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
10.2 PPG89th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.8 stocks76th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
16.3
17th event percentile
Prospect index
24.6
16th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
41.9
31st event percentile
Defensive efficiency
73.2
24th event percentile
Two-way margin
-31.3
27th event percentile
Stop percentage
62.7%
38th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
10.2 PPG
89th event percentile
Creation
1.8 APG
75th event percentile
Rebounding
4.0 RPG
60th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.8 stocks
76th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
32.7% TS
49th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P89
Scorer
10.2 PPG · 89th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 17th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 41.9 ORtg and 73.2 DRtg, producing a -31.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring load, defensive activity, and creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 89th event percentile
Scoring load
10.2 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
- 76th event percentile
Defensive activity
3.8 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
- 75th event percentile
Creation
1.8 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Relative weaknesses
- 24th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
73.2 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 27th event percentile
Two-way margin
-31.3 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
- 31st event percentile
Offensive efficiency
41.9 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
10.2 PPG
89th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
32.7%
49th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
30.0%
50th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
25.7%
45th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
25.0%
context4.8 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
19.4%
29th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.8 APG
75th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
73.2
24th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
72.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.7
57th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
62.7%
38th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.8 STL+BLK
76th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
49.8
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-31.3
27th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-24.6
17th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
16.3
17th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
24.6
16th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-48.6%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.0 RPG
60th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
143.9
context28.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
70.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#120
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
552.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
10.2
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.8
APG
#120
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#120/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.2
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.8
APG
11.6
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.2
P89
Playmaking
1.8
P75
Rebounding
4.0
P60
True shooting
33%
P49
Two-way impact
-31.3
P27
Stops
63%
P38
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
26%
18 made / 70 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
6 made / 24 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
9 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
34% of attempts from three
●2PA 46●3PA 24
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
51
PTS
10.2 / game
18–70
FGM–FGA
6–24
3PM–3PA
9–18
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.8 / game
58
TOV
11.6 / game
0.16×
AST:TOV
16
FD
rebounding
20
REB
4.0 / game
6
OREB
14
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
18
STL
3.6 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
19
PF
19
STL+BLK
3.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
16.3
HESI
24.6
PI
41.9
ORtg
73.2
DRtg
-31.3
NRtg
-24.6
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
19%
Floor%
30%
eFG%
-49%
PIE
72.5
Team DRtg
-0.7
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #119A'Maria PeguesUgandarank_below · #121Pauline Achieng AchollaKenya
//current_rank
#120
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#118
#119
#121
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
10.2
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.8
APG
3.6
SPG
0.2
BPG
25%
3P%
33%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #120
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.2
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.8
APG
11.6
TOV/G
1.2
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.2
P89
Playmaking
1.8
P75
Rebounding
4.0
P60
True shooting
33%
P49
Two-way impact
-31.3
P27
Stops
63%
P38
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
26%
18 made / 70 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
25%
6 made / 24 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
9 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
34% of attempts from three
●2PA 46●3PA 24
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
51
PTS
10.2 / game
18–70
FGM–FGA
6–24
3PM–3PA
9–18
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.8 / game
58
TOV
11.6 / game
0.16×
AST:TOV
16
FD
rebounding
20
REB
4.0 / game
6
OREB
14
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
18
STL
3.6 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
19
PF
19
STL+BLK
3.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
16.3
HESI
24.6
PI
41.9
ORtg
73.2
DRtg
-31.3
NRtg
-24.6
Stable NRtg
63%
Stop%
19%
Floor%
30%
eFG%
-49%
PIE
72.5
Team DRtg
-0.7
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.