back_to_rankings
Mugisha Calvin portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Mugisha Calvin

RWA · b. 2008

//measurables

195 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

//event_signalDisruptor3.7 steals + blocks per game · 93rd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity8.0 RPG + 3.7 defensive plays/G · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRebounder8.0 RPG · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalRim Protection1.0 BPG · 87th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.

3.7 stocksDefensive activity · 93rd event percentile

8.0 RPGRebounding · 92nd event percentile

7.3
HESI v2.1
#128
of 138
65%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #128 of 138 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

7.3

Event performance

8th event percentile

PI

17.3

Prospect index

8th event percentile

ORtg

56.6

Points / 100 poss.

23rd event percentile

DRtg

88.0

Lower is better

24th event percentile

NRtg

-31.4

Two-way margin

21st event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 56.6 · 23rd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 88.0 · Stop% 60.6% · Team DRtg 88.4

Sample context

3 games · 112 minutes · 65% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

3.7 stocks93rd event percentile

Rebounding

8.0 RPG92nd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

  3. 03

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

7.3

8th event percentile

Prospect index

17.3

8th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

56.6

23rd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

88.0

24th event percentile

Two-way margin

-31.4

21st event percentile

Stop percentage

60.6%

48th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

6.7 PPG

67th event percentile

Creation

2.0 APG

80th event percentile

Rebounding

8.0 RPG

92nd event percentile

Defensive activity

3.7 stocks

93rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

28.4% TS

24th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

  • P93

    Disruptor

    3.7 steals + blocks per game · 93rd event percentile

  • P92

    Activity

    8.0 RPG + 3.7 defensive plays/G · 92nd event percentile

  • P92

    Rebounder

    8.0 RPG · 92nd event percentile

  • P87

    Rim Protection

    1.0 BPG · 87th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 8th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 56.6 ORtg and 88.0 DRtg, producing a -31.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity, rebounding, and creation. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and defensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive activity

    3.7 steals + blocks/G

    93rd event percentile

    Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.

  2. Rebounding

    8.0 RPG

    92nd event percentile

    Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

  3. Creation

    2.0 APG

    80th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Two-way margin

    -31.4 NRtg

    21st event percentile

    The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

  2. Offensive efficiency

    56.6 ORtg

    23rd event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

  3. Defensive efficiency

    88.0 DRtg

    24th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

56.6

23rd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

6.7 PPG

67th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

28.4%

24th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

19.2%

17th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

19.2%

19th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

3.3 attempts per game

Free throws

47.6%

37th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

30.5%

36th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.0 APG

80th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

88.0

24th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

88.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+0.4

62nd event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

60.6%

48th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

3.7 STL+BLK

93rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

28.5

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-31.4

21st event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-22.3

8th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

7.3

8th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

17.3

8th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.6%

40th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

8.0 RPG

92nd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

3

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

111.8

context

37.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

65.1%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#128

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

421.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

3

GP

6.7

PPG

8.0

RPG

2.0

APG

#128

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#8

RANK

70

FIELD

90%

PERCENTILE

7.3

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#128/138view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.7

PPG

8.0

RPG

2.0

APG

4.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

28%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.7

P67

Playmaking

2.0

P80

Rebounding

8.0

P92

True shooting

28%

P24

Two-way impact

-31.4

P21

Stops

61%

P48

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

19%

5 made / 26 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 10 attempts

FT

Free throws

48%

10 made / 21 attempts

Shot selection

38% of attempts from three

●2PA 16●3PA 10

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

20

PTS

6.7 / game

5–26

FGM–FGA

0–10

3PM–3PA

10–21

FTM–FTA

creation

6

AST

2.0 / game

12

TOV

4.0 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

16

FD

rebounding

24

REB

8.0 / game

10

OREB

14

DREB

8.0

REB/G

defense

8

STL

2.7 / game

3

BLK

1.0 / game

4

PF

11

STL+BLK

3.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

7.3

HESI

17.3

PI

56.6

ORtg

88.0

DRtg

-31.4

NRtg

-22.3

Stable NRtg

61%

Stop%

30%

Floor%

19%

eFG%

2%

PIE

88.4

Team DRtg

+0.4

Def. lift

sample_context

3 games112 minutes37.3 min/game65% sample weightrank #128 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.3

PPG

8.5

RPG

1.0

APG

3.5

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

50%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.3

P62

Playmaking

1.0

P46

Rebounding

8.5

P84

True shooting

50%

P83

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

48%

10 made / 21 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 6 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

9 made / 18 attempts

Shot selection

29% of attempts from three

●2PA 15●3PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

29

PTS

7.3 / game

10–21

FGM–FGA

0–6

3PM–3PA

9–18

FTM–FTA

creation

4

AST

1.0 / game

14

TOV

3.5 / game

0.29×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

34

REB

8.5 / game

11

OREB

23

DREB

8.5

REB/G

defense

10

STL

2.5 / game

9

BLK

2.3 / game

11

PF

19

STL+BLK

4.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

48%

eFG%

3%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #8 of 70
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Charles Mbeng Ebane portrait#126

    Charles Mbeng Ebane

    Small Forward · Gabon

    0.8 PPG 3.0 RPG 0.3 APG

  • Mahmoud Kouki portrait#127

    Mahmoud Kouki

    Power Forward · Tunisia

    2.5 PPG 2.8 RPG 0.3 APG

  • Elhadji Podor Ndiaye portrait#129

    Elhadji Podor Ndiaye

    Guard · Senegal

    0.7 PPG 1.3 RPG 2.5 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4

GP

7.3

PPG

8.5

RPG

1.0

APG

2.5

SPG

2.3

BPG

—

3P%

50%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

3 GP · event rank #128

//quick_read

The line at a glance

6.7

PPG

8.0

RPG

2.0

APG

4.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

28%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

6.7

P67

Playmaking

2.0

P80

Rebounding

8.0

P92

True shooting

28%

P24

Two-way impact

-31.4

P21

Stops

61%

P48

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

19%

5 made / 26 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 10 attempts

FT

Free throws

48%

10 made / 21 attempts

Shot selection

38% of attempts from three

●2PA 16●3PA 10

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

20

PTS

6.7 / game

5–26

FGM–FGA

0–10

3PM–3PA

10–21

FTM–FTA

creation

6

AST

2.0 / game

12

TOV

4.0 / game

0.50×

AST:TOV

16

FD

rebounding

24

REB

8.0 / game

10

OREB

14

DREB

8.0

REB/G

defense

8

STL

2.7 / game

3

BLK

1.0 / game

4

PF

11

STL+BLK

3.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

7.3

HESI

17.3

PI

56.6

ORtg

88.0

DRtg

-31.4

NRtg

-22.3

Stable NRtg

61%

Stop%

30%

Floor%

19%

eFG%

2%

PIE

88.4

Team DRtg

+0.4

Def. lift

sample_context

3 games112 minutes37.3 min/game65% sample weightrank #128 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026

4 GP · event rank #8

//quick_read

The line at a glance

7.3

PPG

8.5

RPG

1.0

APG

3.5

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

50%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

7.3

P62

Playmaking

1.0

P46

Rebounding

8.5

P84

True shooting

50%

P83

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

48%

10 made / 21 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 6 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

9 made / 18 attempts

Shot selection

29% of attempts from three

●2PA 15●3PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

29

PTS

7.3 / game

10–21

FGM–FGA

0–6

3PM–3PA

9–18

FTM–FTA

creation

4

AST

1.0 / game

14

TOV

3.5 / game

0.29×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

34

REB

8.5 / game

11

OREB

23

DREB

8.5

REB/G

defense

10

STL

2.5 / game

9

BLK

2.3 / game

11

PF

19

STL+BLK

4.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

48%

eFG%

3%

PIE

sample_context

4 gamesrank #8 of 70

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.