ORtg
56.6
23rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
RWA · b. 2008
//measurables
195 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
3.7 stocksDefensive activity · 93rd event percentile
8.0 RPGRebounding · 92nd event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #128 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
7.3
Event performance
8th event percentile
PI
17.3
Prospect index
8th event percentile
ORtg
56.6
Points / 100 poss.
23rd event percentile
DRtg
88.0
Lower is better
24th event percentile
NRtg
-31.4
Two-way margin
21st event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 56.6 · 23rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 88.0 · Stop% 60.6% · Team DRtg 88.4
Sample context
3 games · 112 minutes · 65% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
Rebounding
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
7.3
8th event percentile
Prospect index
17.3
8th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
56.6
23rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
88.0
24th event percentile
Two-way margin
-31.4
21st event percentile
Stop percentage
60.6%
48th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
6.7 PPG
67th event percentile
Creation
2.0 APG
80th event percentile
Rebounding
8.0 RPG
92nd event percentile
Defensive activity
3.7 stocks
93rd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
28.4% TS
24th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Disruptor
3.7 steals + blocks per game · 93rd event percentile
Activity
8.0 RPG + 3.7 defensive plays/G · 92nd event percentile
Rebounder
8.0 RPG · 92nd event percentile
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 87th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 8th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 56.6 ORtg and 88.0 DRtg, producing a -31.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity, rebounding, and creation. The lowest relative areas are two-way margin, offensive efficiency, and defensive efficiency.
Defensive activity
3.7 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Rebounding
8.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Creation
2.0 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Two-way margin
-31.4 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Offensive efficiency
56.6 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Defensive efficiency
88.0 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
56.6
23rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
6.7 PPG
67th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
28.4%
24th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
19.2%
17th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
19.2%
19th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context3.3 attempts per game
Free throws
47.6%
37th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
30.5%
36th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.0 APG
80th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
88.0
24th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+0.4
62nd event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
60.6%
48th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.7 STL+BLK
93rd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
28.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-31.4
21st event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-22.3
8th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
7.3
8th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
17.3
8th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.6%
40th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
8.0 RPG
92nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
3
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
111.8
context37.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
65.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#128
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
421.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
3
GP
6.7
PPG
8.0
RPG
2.0
APG
#128
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#8
RANK
70
FIELD
90%
PERCENTILE
7.3
PPG
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
6.7
PPG
8.0
RPG
2.0
APG
4.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
28%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.7
P67
Playmaking
2.0
P80
Rebounding
8.0
P92
True shooting
28%
P24
Two-way impact
-31.4
P21
Stops
61%
P48
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
19%
5 made / 26 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
48%
10 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
38% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
20
PTS
6.7 / game
5–26
FGM–FGA
0–10
3PM–3PA
10–21
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
2.0 / game
12
TOV
4.0 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
16
FD
rebounding
24
REB
8.0 / game
10
OREB
14
DREB
8.0
REB/G
defense
8
STL
2.7 / game
3
BLK
1.0 / game
4
PF
11
STL+BLK
3.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
7.3
HESI
17.3
PI
56.6
ORtg
88.0
DRtg
-31.4
NRtg
-22.3
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
19%
eFG%
2%
PIE
88.4
Team DRtg
+0.4
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
//quick_read
7.3
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.0
APG
3.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.3
P62
Playmaking
1.0
P46
Rebounding
8.5
P84
True shooting
50%
P83
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
48%
10 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
9 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
29% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
29
PTS
7.3 / game
10–21
FGM–FGA
0–6
3PM–3PA
9–18
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.0 / game
14
TOV
3.5 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
34
REB
8.5 / game
11
OREB
23
DREB
8.5
REB/G
defense
10
STL
2.5 / game
9
BLK
2.3 / game
11
PF
19
STL+BLK
4.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
48%
eFG%
3%
PIE
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
//current_rank
#128
of 138 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
7.3
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.0
APG
2.5
SPG
2.3
BPG
—
3P%
50%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
3 GP · event rank #128
//quick_read
6.7
PPG
8.0
RPG
2.0
APG
4.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
28%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.7
P67
Playmaking
2.0
P80
Rebounding
8.0
P92
True shooting
28%
P24
Two-way impact
-31.4
P21
Stops
61%
P48
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
19%
5 made / 26 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
48%
10 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
38% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
20
PTS
6.7 / game
5–26
FGM–FGA
0–10
3PM–3PA
10–21
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
2.0 / game
12
TOV
4.0 / game
0.50×
AST:TOV
16
FD
rebounding
24
REB
8.0 / game
10
OREB
14
DREB
8.0
REB/G
defense
8
STL
2.7 / game
3
BLK
1.0 / game
4
PF
11
STL+BLK
3.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
7.3
HESI
17.3
PI
56.6
ORtg
88.0
DRtg
-31.4
NRtg
-22.3
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
19%
eFG%
2%
PIE
88.4
Team DRtg
+0.4
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #8
//quick_read
7.3
PPG
8.5
RPG
1.0
APG
3.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
50%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
7.3
P62
Playmaking
1.0
P46
Rebounding
8.5
P84
True shooting
50%
P83
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
48%
10 made / 21 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 6 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
9 made / 18 attempts
Shot selection
29% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
29
PTS
7.3 / game
10–21
FGM–FGA
0–6
3PM–3PA
9–18
FTM–FTA
creation
4
AST
1.0 / game
14
TOV
3.5 / game
0.29×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
34
REB
8.5 / game
11
OREB
23
DREB
8.5
REB/G
defense
10
STL
2.5 / game
9
BLK
2.3 / game
11
PF
19
STL+BLK
4.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
48%
eFG%
3%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.