Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Mahmoud Kouki

Power Forward · TUN · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

205 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive activity-led profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.2 stocksDefensive activity · 59th event percentile

2.8 RPGRebounding · 37th event percentile

9.5
HESI v2.1: #127
of 138: 65%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #127 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

9.5

Event performance

10th event percentile

19.1

Prospect index

8th event percentile

ORtg

47.8

Points / 100 poss.

18th event percentile

DRtg

77.5

Lower is better

53rd event percentile

NRtg

-29.8

Two-way margin

23rd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 47.8 · 18th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 77.5 · Stop% 53.2% · Team DRtg 72.7

Sample context

6 games · 111 minutes · 65% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

1.2 stocks59th event percentile

Rebounding

2.8 RPG37th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

9.5

10th event percentile

Prospect index

19.1

8th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

47.8

18th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

77.5

53rd event percentile

Two-way margin

-29.8

23rd event percentile

Stop percentage

53.2%

27th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

2.5 PPG

31st event percentile

Creation

0.3 APG

22nd event percentile

Rebounding

2.8 RPG

37th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.2 stocks

59th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

30.4% TS

31st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 10th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 47.8 ORtg and 77.5 DRtg, producing a -29.8 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, creation, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Offensive efficiency
47.8 ORtg
18th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Creation
0.3 APG
22nd event percentile
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Two-way margin
-29.8 NRtg
23rd event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

47.8

18th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

2.5 PPG

31st event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

30.4%

31st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

27.3%

31st event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

27.3%

43rd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.2 attempts per game

Free throws

50.0%

45th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

24.1%

21st event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.3 APG

22nd event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

77.5

53rd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

72.7

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.9

28th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

53.2%

27th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.2 STL+BLK

59th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

23.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-29.8

23rd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-21.2

10th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

9.5

10th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

19.1

8th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-4.7%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.8 RPG

37th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

110.6

context

18.4 minutes per game.

Sample weight

64.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#127

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

476.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

2.5

PPG

2.8

RPG

0.3

APG

#127

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#23

RANK

FIELD

33%

PERCENTILE

3.8

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#127/138Event board →

2.5

PPG

2.8

RPG

0.3

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1

Regional · 2026

#23/34Event board →

3.8

PPG

5.0

RPG

0.3

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #126Charles Mbeng EbaneSF · Gabon

//current_rank

#127

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #128Mugisha CalvinRwanda

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#125
Youssef belgada
Morocco
2.0 PPG 2.2 RPG 0.0 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 1 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

3.8

PPG

5.0

RPG

0.3

APG

0.5

SPG

1.0

BPG

—

3P%

39%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

6 GP · event rank #127

//quick_read

The line at a glance

2.5

PPG

2.8

RPG

0.3

APG

2.5

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

30%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

2.5

P31

Playmaking

0.3

P22

Rebounding

2.8

P37

True shooting

30%

P31

Two-way impact

-29.8

P23

Stops

53%

P27

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

27%

6 made / 22 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 1 attempts

Free throws

50%

3 made / 6 attempts

Shot selection

5% of attempts from three

●2PA 21●3PA 1

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

2.5 / game

6–22

FGM–FGA

0–1

3PM–3PA

3–6

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.3 / game

TOV

2.5 / game

0.13×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.8 / game

OREB

DREB

2.8

REB/G

defense

STL

0.7 / game

BLK

0.5 / game

STL+BLK

1.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

9.5

HESI

19.1

47.8

ORtg

77.5

DRtg

-29.8

NRtg

-21.2

Stable NRtg

53%

Stop%

24%

Floor%

27%

eFG%

-5%

PIE

72.7

Team DRtg

-4.9

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 12026

4 GP · event rank #23

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.8

PPG

5.0

RPG

0.3

APG

3.3

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

39%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.8

P40

Playmaking

0.3

P19

Rebounding

5.0

P74

True shooting

39%

P57

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

42%

5 made / 12 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Free throws

31%

5 made / 16 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 12●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

3.8 / game

5–12

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

5–16

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.3 / game

TOV

3.3 / game

0.08×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

5.0 / game

OREB

DREB

5.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.5 / game

BLK

1.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

42%

eFG%

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.