ORtg
23.8
11th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Umberline Wilhelmine Mindesse Adjovi
Point Guard · BEN · b. 2009
//measurables
157 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led profile
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
0.3 APGCreation · 23rd event percentile
1.0 PPGScoring load · 15th event percentile
- 8.5
- HESI v2.1
- #129
- of 142
- 34%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #129 of 142 · Limited sample
HESI
8.5
Event performance
9th event percentile
PI
19.5
Prospect index
10th event percentile
ORtg
23.8
Points / 100 poss.
11th event percentile
DRtg
91.5
Lower is better
2nd event percentile
NRtg
-67.7
Two-way margin
5th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 23.8 · 11th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 91.5 · Stop% 33.9% · Team DRtg 80.2
Sample context
4 games · 31 minutes · 34% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led profileevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
0.3 APG23rd event percentile
Scoring load
1.0 PPG15th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
8.5
9th event percentile
Prospect index
19.5
10th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
23.8
11th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
91.5
2nd event percentile
Two-way margin
-67.7
5th event percentile
Stop percentage
33.9%
2nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
1.0 PPG
15th event percentile
Creation
0.3 APG
23rd event percentile
Rebounding
0.8 RPG
11th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.0 stocks
13th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
17.0% TS
12th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 9th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 23.8 ORtg and 91.5 DRtg, producing a -67.7 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 2nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
91.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 2nd event percentile
Defensive stops
33.9% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 5th event percentile
Two-way margin
-67.7 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
1.0 PPG
15th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
17.0%
12th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
10.0%
9th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
10.0%
9th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.8 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
13.0%
12th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.3 APG
23rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
91.5
2nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
80.2
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-11.3
5th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
33.9%
2nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.0 STL+BLK
13th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
5.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-67.7
5th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-28.7
9th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
8.5
9th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
19.5
10th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-7.2%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
0.8 RPG
11th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
4
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
31.1
context7.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
34.1%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Limited sample
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#129
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
406.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
4
GP
1.0
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.3
APG
#129
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#13
RANK
20
FIELD
37%
PERCENTILE
4.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#129/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.0
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.3
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
17%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.0
P15
Playmaking
0.3
P23
Rebounding
0.8
P11
True shooting
17%
P12
Two-way impact
-67.7
P5
Stops
34%
P2
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
10%
1 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
4
PTS
1.0 / game
1–10
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
9
TOV
2.3 / game
0.11×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
3
REB
0.8 / game
1
OREB
2
DREB
0.8
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
0
STL+BLK
0.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
8.5
HESI
19.5
PI
23.8
ORtg
91.5
DRtg
-67.7
NRtg
-28.7
Stable NRtg
34%
Stop%
13%
Floor%
10%
eFG%
-7%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
-11.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3
Regional · 2026
#13/20view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.0
APG
4.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
28%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P53
Playmaking
0.0
P20
Rebounding
2.0
P28
True shooting
28%
P34
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
9%
1 made / 11 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
6 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
18% of attempts from three
●2PA 9●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
8
PTS
4.0 / game
1–11
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
6–8
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
8
TOV
4.0 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
4
REB
2.0 / game
1
OREB
3
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
4
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
4
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
9%
eFG%
0%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#127
Kenya
6.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 2.5 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.7 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#128
#130
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 3 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
2
GP
4.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.0
APG
2.0
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
28%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
4 GP · event rank #129
//quick_read
The line at a glance
1.0
PPG
0.8
RPG
0.3
APG
2.3
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
17%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
1.0
P15
Playmaking
0.3
P23
Rebounding
0.8
P11
True shooting
17%
P12
Two-way impact
-67.7
P5
Stops
34%
P2
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
10%
1 made / 10 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
2 made / 4 attempts
Shot selection
30% of attempts from three
●2PA 7●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
4
PTS
1.0 / game
1–10
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
2–4
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.3 / game
9
TOV
2.3 / game
0.11×
AST:TOV
2
FD
rebounding
3
REB
0.8 / game
1
OREB
2
DREB
0.8
REB/G
defense
0
STL
0.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
0
STL+BLK
0.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
8.5
HESI
19.5
PI
23.8
ORtg
91.5
DRtg
-67.7
NRtg
-28.7
Stable NRtg
34%
Stop%
13%
Floor%
10%
eFG%
-7%
PIE
80.2
Team DRtg
-11.3
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 32026
2 GP · event rank #13
//quick_read
The line at a glance
4.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
0.0
APG
4.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
28%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
4.0
P53
Playmaking
0.0
P20
Rebounding
2.0
P28
True shooting
28%
P34
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
9%
1 made / 11 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 2 attempts
FT
Free throws
75%
6 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
18% of attempts from three
●2PA 9●3PA 2
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
8
PTS
4.0 / game
1–11
FGM–FGA
0–2
3PM–3PA
6–8
FTM–FTA
creation
0
AST
0.0 / game
8
TOV
4.0 / game
0.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
4
REB
2.0 / game
1
OREB
3
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
4
STL
2.0 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
4
STL+BLK
2.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
9%
eFG%
0%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.