back_to_rankings
Maguette Ndiaye portrait
Unclaimed
event_player

Maguette Ndiaye

Center · SEN · b. 2009

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

205 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Defensive impact profile

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

0.3 stocksDefensive activity · 36th event percentile

1.7 RPGRebounding · 23rd event percentile

26.3
HESI v2.1
#101
of 138
19%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #101 of 138 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

26.3

Event performance

26th event percentile

PI

33.7

Prospect index

27th event percentile

ORtg

5.7

Points / 100 poss.

2nd event percentile

DRtg

55.2

Lower is better

99th event percentile

NRtg

-49.4

Two-way margin

10th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 5.7 · 2nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 55.2 · Stop% 84.5% · Team DRtg 60.6

Sample context

3 games · 14 minutes · 19% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Defensive impact profileevent-relative description

Defensive activity and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Defensive activity

0.3 stocks36th event percentile

Rebounding

1.7 RPG23rd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

  3. 03

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

26.3

26th event percentile

Prospect index

33.7

27th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

5.7

2nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

55.2

99th event percentile

Two-way margin

-49.4

10th event percentile

Stop percentage

84.5%

95th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

0.0 PPG

3rd event percentile

Creation

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Rebounding

1.7 RPG

23rd event percentile

Defensive activity

0.3 stocks

36th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

0.0% TS

3rd event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation
event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 26th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 5.7 ORtg and 55.2 DRtg, producing a -49.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency and defensive stops. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, scoring load, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Defensive efficiency

    55.2 DRtg

    99th event percentile

    The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.

  2. Defensive stops

    84.5% Stop%

    95th event percentile

    The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Offensive efficiency

    5.7 ORtg

    2nd event percentile

    The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

  2. Scoring load

    0.0 PPG

    3rd event percentile

    Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    0.0% TS

    3rd event percentile

    True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

5.7

2nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

0.0 PPG

3rd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

0.0%

3rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

0.0%

4th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

0.0%

4th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Floor%

2.9%

2nd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

55.2

99th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

60.6

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

+5.4

89th event percentile

Player DRtg is lower than the team baseline.

Stop%

84.5%

95th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.3 STL+BLK

36th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

4.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-49.4

10th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-13.8

26th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

26.3

26th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

33.7

27th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-2.4%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.7 RPG

23rd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

3

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

14.3

context

4.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

19.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#101

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

470.6

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

3

GP

0.0

PPG

1.7

RPG

0.0

APG

#101

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

3

GP

0.0

PPG

1.7

RPG

0.0

APG

Full statistics →
event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Moise Nshizimpumu Munyakazi portrait#99

    Moise Nshizimpumu Munyakazi

    Rwanda

    0.7 PPG 1.0 RPG 0.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

3

GP

0.0

PPG

1.7

RPG

0.0

APG

0.0

SPG

0.3

BPG

—

3P%

0%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

3 GP · event rank #101

//quick_read

The line at a glance

0.0

PPG

1.7

RPG

0.0

APG

0.7

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

0%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

0.0

P3

Playmaking

0.0

P6

Rebounding

1.7

P23

True shooting

0%

P3

Two-way impact

-49.4

P10

Stops

84%

P95

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

0%

0 made / 4 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

FT

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 4●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

0

PTS

0.0 / game

0–4

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

0

AST

0.0 / game

2

TOV

0.7 / game

0.00×

AST:TOV

0

FD

rebounding

5

REB

1.7 / game

1

OREB

4

DREB

1.7

REB/G

defense

0

STL

0.0 / game

1

BLK

0.3 / game

6

PF

1

STL+BLK

0.3 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

26.3

HESI

33.7

PI

5.7

ORtg

55.2

DRtg

-49.4

NRtg

-13.8

Stable NRtg

84%

Stop%

3%

Floor%

0%

eFG%

-2%

PIE

60.6

Team DRtg

+5.4

Def. lift

sample_context

3 games14 minutes4.8 min/game19% sample weightrank #101 of 138

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.