Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Aasim Penge

RWA · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

188 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

36.8% TSScoring efficiency · 51st event percentile

0.6 APGCreation · 34th event percentile

28.5
HESI v2.1: #100
of 138: 55%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #100 of 138 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

28.5

Event performance

29th event percentile

34.3

Prospect index

28th event percentile

ORtg

77.7

Points / 100 poss.

57th event percentile

DRtg

98.2

Lower is better

3rd event percentile

NRtg

-20.6

Two-way margin

32nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 77.7 · 57th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 98.2 · Stop% 37.2% · Team DRtg 88.4

Sample context

5 games · 73 minutes · 55% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

36.8% TS51st event percentile

Creation

0.6 APG34th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

28.5

29th event percentile

Prospect index

34.3

28th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

77.7

57th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

98.2

3rd event percentile

Two-way margin

-20.6

32nd event percentile

Stop percentage

37.2%

5th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.2 PPG

34th event percentile

Creation

0.6 APG

34th event percentile

Rebounding

1.4 RPG

18th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.4 stocks

25th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

36.8% TS

51st event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 29th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 77.7 ORtg and 98.2 DRtg, producing a -20.6 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and rebounding.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
98.2 DRtg
3rd event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive stops
37.2% Stop%
5th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Rebounding
1.4 RPG
18th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

77.7

57th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.2 PPG

34th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

36.8%

51st event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

32.5%

46th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

25.0%

32nd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

23.1%

context

2.6 attempts per game

Free throws

75.0%

84th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

32.3%

44th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.6 APG

34th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

98.2

3rd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

88.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-9.9

5th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

37.2%

5th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.4 STL+BLK

25th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

11.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-20.6

32nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-13.7

29th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

28.5

29th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

34.3

28th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

0.8%

34th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.4 RPG

18th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

72.9

context

14.6 minutes per game.

Sample weight

54.9%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#100

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

421.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

3.2

PPG

1.4

RPG

0.6

APG

#100

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#100/138Event board →

3.2

PPG

1.4

RPG

0.6

APG

Full statistics →

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5

Regional · 2026

#64/70Event board →

0.0

PPG

2.0

RPG

1.0

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players

rank_above · #99Moise Nshizimpumu MunyakaziRwanda

//current_rank

#100

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #101Maguette NdiayeC · Senegal

#1
Nathan Djako
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
#98
Isamil Hassini
Morocco
1.8 PPG 3.2 RPG 0.0 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

3.2

PPG

1.4

RPG

0.6

APG

0.4

SPG

0.0

BPG

23%

3P%

37%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #100

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.2

PPG

1.4

RPG

0.6

APG

0.8

TOV/G

0.6

3PM/G

37%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.2

P34

Playmaking

0.6

P34

Rebounding

1.4

P18

True shooting

37%

P51

Two-way impact

-20.6

P32

Stops

37%

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

25%

5 made / 20 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

23%

3 made / 13 attempts

Free throws

75%

3 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

65% of attempts from three

●2PA 7●3PA 13

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

3.2 / game

5–20

FGM–FGA

3–13

3PM–3PA

3–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.6 / game

TOV

0.8 / game

0.75×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

1.4 / game

OREB

DREB

1.4

REB/G

defense

STL

0.4 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.4 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

28.5

HESI

34.3

77.7

ORtg

98.2

DRtg

-20.6

NRtg

-13.7

Stable NRtg

37%

Stop%

32%

Floor%

33%

eFG%

PIE

88.4

Team DRtg

-9.9

Def. lift

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026

1 GP · event rank #64

//quick_read

The line at a glance

0.0

PPG

2.0

RPG

1.0

APG

3.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

—

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

0.0

Playmaking

1.0

P46

Rebounding

2.0

P26

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

—

0 made / 0 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

0.0 / game

0–0

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.0 / game

TOV

3.0 / game

0.33×

AST:TOV

—

rebounding

REB

2.0 / game

OREB

DREB

2.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.0 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

PIE

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.