Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Jordan Martin

MEX · b. 2011

//measurables

182 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

44.5% TSScoring efficiency · 60th event percentile

5.0 PPGScoring load · 55th event percentile

33.0
HESI v2.1: #124
of 192: 62%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #124 of 192 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

33.0

Event performance

33rd event percentile

43.3

Prospect index

36th event percentile

ORtg

89.2

Points / 100 poss.

62nd event percentile

DRtg

101.7

Lower is better

7th event percentile

NRtg

-12.5

Two-way margin

34th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 89.2 · 62nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 101.7 · Stop% 44.8% · Team DRtg 96.5

Sample context

7 games · 99 minutes · 62% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

44.5% TS60th event percentile

Scoring load

5.0 PPG55th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
03
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

33.0

33rd event percentile

Prospect index

43.3

36th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

89.2

62nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

101.7

7th event percentile

Two-way margin

-12.5

34th event percentile

Stop percentage

44.8%

12th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.0 PPG

55th event percentile

Creation

0.9 APG

40th event percentile

Rebounding

2.4 RPG

39th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.9 stocks

47th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

44.5% TS

60th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 33rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 89.2 ORtg and 101.7 DRtg, producing a -12.5 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
101.7 DRtg
7th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive stops
44.8% Stop%
12th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Two-way margin
-12.5 NRtg
34th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

89.2

62nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.0 PPG

55th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

44.5%

60th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

40.3%

60th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

38.7%

68th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

16.7%

context

0.9 attempts per game

Free throws

52.6%

43rd event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

45.4%

78th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.9 APG

40th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

101.7

7th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

96.5

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-5.1

26th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

44.8%

12th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.9 STL+BLK

47th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

17.9

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-12.5

34th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-7.7

33rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

33.0

33rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

43.3

36th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

0.9%

26th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.4 RPG

39th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

99.2

context

14.2 minutes per game.

Sample weight

62.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#124

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

565.6

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

5.0

PPG

2.4

RPG

0.9

APG

#124

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#124/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.0

PPG

2.4

RPG

0.9

APG

0.7

TOV/G

0.1

3PM/G

45%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.0

P55

Playmaking

0.9

P40

Rebounding

2.4

P39

True shooting

45%

P60

Two-way impact

-12.5

P34

Stops

45%

P12

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

39%

12 made / 31 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

Free throws

53%

10 made / 19 attempts

Shot selection

19% of attempts from three

●2PA 25●3PA 6

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.0 / game

12–31

FGM–FGA

1–6

3PM–3PA

10–19

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.9 / game

TOV

0.7 / game

1.20×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.4 / game

OREB

DREB

2.4

REB/G

defense

STL

0.3 / game

BLK

0.6 / game

STL+BLK

0.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

33.0

HESI

43.3

89.2

ORtg

101.7

DRtg

-12.5

NRtg

-7.7

Stable NRtg

45%

Stop%

45%

Floor%

40%

eFG%

PIE

96.5

Team DRtg

-5.1

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #123Isabel HassanITA

//current_rank

#124

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #125Ema BartosovaCZE

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5.0

PPG

2.4

RPG

0.9

APG

0.3

SPG

0.6

BPG

17%

3P%

45%

TS%

event_stats