Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Xuan Sun

CHN · b. 2009

//measurables

170 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

6.7 APGCreation · 99th event percentile

3.9 RPGRebounding · 67th event percentile

68.6
HESI v2.1: #64
of 192: 79%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #64 of 192 · High confidence

HESI v2.1

HESI

68.6

Event performance

68th event percentile

69.4

Prospect index

67th event percentile

ORtg

99.5

Points / 100 poss.

78th event percentile

DRtg

90.1

Lower is better

22nd event percentile

NRtg

+9.3

Two-way margin

64th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 99.5 · 78th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 90.1 · Stop% 49.6% · Team DRtg 85.4

Sample context

7 games · 222 minutes · 79% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

6.7 APG99th event percentile

Rebounding

3.9 RPG67th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

68.6

68th event percentile

Prospect index

69.4

67th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

99.5

78th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

90.1

22nd event percentile

Two-way margin

+9.3

64th event percentile

Stop percentage

49.6%

25th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

5.3 PPG

57th event percentile

Creation

6.7 APG

99th event percentile

Rebounding

3.9 RPG

67th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.1 stocks

45th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

37.6% TS

37th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P100
Creator
6.7 APG · 100th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 68th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 99.5 ORtg and 90.1 DRtg, producing a +9.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, offensive efficiency, and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

Creation
6.7 APG
99th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Offensive efficiency
99.5 ORtg
78th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
Rebounding
3.9 RPG
67th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
90.1 DRtg
22nd event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive stops
49.6% Stop%
25th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Scoring efficiency
37.6% TS
37th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

99.5

78th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

5.3 PPG

57th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

37.6%

37th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

37.2%

47th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

29.8%

37th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

22.6%

context

4.4 attempts per game

Free throws

40.0%

21st event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

42.8%

70th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

6.7 APG

99th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

90.1

22nd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

85.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-4.7

27th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

49.6%

25th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.1 STL+BLK

45th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

41.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+9.3

64th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+7.4

68th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

68.6

68th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

69.4

67th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

8.2%

86th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.9 RPG

67th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

222.3

context

31.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

78.8%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

High confidence

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#64

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

530.2

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

5.3

PPG

3.9

RPG

6.7

APG

#64

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#64/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

5.3

PPG

3.9

RPG

6.7

APG

1.4

TOV/G

1.0

3PM/G

38%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

5.3

P57

Playmaking

6.7

P100

Rebounding

3.9

P67

True shooting

38%

P37

Two-way impact

+9.3

P64

Stops

50%

P25

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

30%

14 made / 47 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

23%

7 made / 31 attempts

Free throws

40%

2 made / 5 attempts

Shot selection

66% of attempts from three

●2PA 16●3PA 31

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

5.3 / game

14–47

FGM–FGA

7–31

3PM–3PA

2–5

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

6.7 / game

TOV

1.4 / game

4.70×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

3.9 / game

OREB

DREB

3.9

REB/G

defense

STL

1.1 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.1 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

68.6

HESI

69.4

99.5

ORtg

90.1

DRtg

+9.3

NRtg

+7.4

Stable NRtg

50%

Stop%

43%

Floor%

37%

eFG%

PIE

85.4

Team DRtg

-4.7

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #63Jay SebasioAUS

//current_rank

#64

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #65Habiba Gamal RizkEgypt

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

5.3

PPG

3.9

RPG

6.7

APG

1.1

SPG

0.0

BPG

23%

3P%

38%

TS%

event_stats