Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Jelizaveta Naidjonova

LAT · b. 2009

//measurables

176 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led profile

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

2.4 APGCreation · 80th event percentile

8.3 PPGScoring load · 79th event percentile

39.3
HESI v2.1: #117
of 192: 69%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #117 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

39.3

Event performance

39th event percentile

45.9

Prospect index

39th event percentile

ORtg

80.4

Points / 100 poss.

42nd event percentile

DRtg

87.8

Lower is better

32nd event percentile

NRtg

-7.4

Two-way margin

40th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 80.4 · 42nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 87.8 · Stop% 51.7% · Team DRtg 84.9

Sample context

7 games · 135 minutes · 69% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led profileevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

2.4 APG80th event percentile

Scoring load

8.3 PPG79th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

39.3

39th event percentile

Prospect index

45.9

39th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

80.4

42nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

87.8

32nd event percentile

Two-way margin

-7.4

40th event percentile

Stop percentage

51.7%

33rd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

8.3 PPG

79th event percentile

Creation

2.4 APG

80th event percentile

Rebounding

2.3 RPG

35th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.0 stocks

51st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

41.1% TS

46th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 39th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 80.4 ORtg and 87.8 DRtg, producing a -7.4 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and rebounding.

Relative strengths

Creation
2.4 APG
80th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Scoring load
8.3 PPG
79th event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive efficiency
87.8 DRtg
32nd event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Defensive stops
51.7% Stop%
33rd event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Rebounding
2.3 RPG
35th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

80.4

42nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

8.3 PPG

79th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

41.1%

46th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

34.2%

39th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

31.7%

41st event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

25.0%

context

1.7 attempts per game

Free throws

70.8%

69th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

38.1%

52nd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.4 APG

80th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

87.8

32nd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

84.9

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-2.9

42nd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

51.7%

33rd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.0 STL+BLK

51st event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

27.9

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-7.4

40th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-5.1

39th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

39.3

39th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

45.9

39th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

3.3%

53rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.3 RPG

35th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

135.0

context

19.3 minutes per game.

Sample weight

69.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#117

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

560.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

8.3

PPG

2.3

RPG

2.4

APG

#117

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#117/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

8.3

PPG

2.3

RPG

2.4

APG

2.3

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

41%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

8.3

P79

Playmaking

2.4

P80

Rebounding

2.3

P35

True shooting

41%

P46

Two-way impact

-7.4

P40

Stops

52%

P33

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

32%

19 made / 60 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

25%

3 made / 12 attempts

Free throws

71%

17 made / 24 attempts

Shot selection

20% of attempts from three

●2PA 48●3PA 12

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

8.3 / game

19–60

FGM–FGA

3–12

3PM–3PA

17–24

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.4 / game

TOV

2.3 / game

1.06×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.3 / game

OREB

DREB

2.3

REB/G

defense

STL

0.9 / game

BLK

0.1 / game

STL+BLK

1.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

39.3

HESI

45.9

80.4

ORtg

87.8

DRtg

-7.4

NRtg

-5.1

Stable NRtg

52%

Stop%

38%

Floor%

34%

eFG%

PIE

84.9

Team DRtg

-2.9

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #116Jodi AbdallaEgypt

//current_rank

#117

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #118Anna SablichITA

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

8.3

PPG

2.3

RPG

2.4

APG

0.9

SPG

0.1

BPG

25%

3P%

41%

TS%

event_stats