ORtg
85.4
55th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Anna Sablich
ITA · b. 2009
//measurables
171 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led profile
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.4 APGCreation · 80th event percentile
7.6 PPGScoring load · 73rd event percentile
- 38.7
- HESI v2.1
- #118
- of 192
- 74%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #118 of 192 · Established
HESI
38.7
Event performance
39th event percentile
PI
45.5
Prospect index
39th event percentile
ORtg
85.4
Points / 100 poss.
55th event percentile
DRtg
92.8
Lower is better
17th event percentile
NRtg
-7.3
Two-way margin
40th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 85.4 · 55th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 92.8 · Stop% 43.8% · Team DRtg 86.3
Sample context
7 games · 173 minutes · 74% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led profileevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.4 APG80th event percentile
Scoring load
7.6 PPG73rd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
38.7
39th event percentile
Prospect index
45.5
39th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
85.4
55th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
92.8
17th event percentile
Two-way margin
-7.3
40th event percentile
Stop percentage
43.8%
8th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.6 PPG
73rd event percentile
Creation
2.4 APG
80th event percentile
Rebounding
1.9 RPG
23rd event percentile
Defensive activity
1.1 stocks
58th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.5% TS
44th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 39th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 85.4 ORtg and 92.8 DRtg, producing a -7.3 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation and scoring load. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and rebounding.
Relative strengths
- 80th event percentile
Creation
2.4 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 73rd event percentile
Scoring load
7.6 PPG
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Relative weaknesses
- 8th event percentile
Defensive stops
43.8% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 17th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
92.8 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 23rd event percentile
Rebounding
1.9 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.6 PPG
73rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.5%
44th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
36.1%
43rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
29.5%
35th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
22.9%
context5.0 attempts per game
Free throws
64.3%
58th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
37.3%
47th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.4 APG
80th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
92.8
17th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
86.3
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.5
16th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
43.8%
8th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.1 STL+BLK
58th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
28.5
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-7.3
40th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-5.4
39th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
38.7
39th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
45.5
39th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.5%
53rd event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.9 RPG
23rd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
173.4
context24.8 minutes per game.
Sample weight
74.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#118
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
525.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
7.6
PPG
1.9
RPG
2.4
APG
#118
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#118/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.6
PPG
1.9
RPG
2.4
APG
1.4
TOV/G
1.1
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.6
P73
Playmaking
2.4
P80
Rebounding
1.9
P23
True shooting
40%
P44
Two-way impact
-7.3
P40
Stops
44%
P8
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
18 made / 61 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
23%
8 made / 35 attempts
FT
Free throws
64%
9 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
57% of attempts from three
●2PA 26●3PA 35
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
53
PTS
7.6 / game
18–61
FGM–FGA
8–35
3PM–3PA
9–14
FTM–FTA
creation
17
AST
2.4 / game
10
TOV
1.4 / game
1.70×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
13
REB
1.9 / game
5
OREB
8
DREB
1.9
REB/G
defense
6
STL
0.9 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
10
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
38.7
HESI
45.5
PI
85.4
ORtg
92.8
DRtg
-7.3
NRtg
-5.4
Stable NRtg
44%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
3%
PIE
86.3
Team DRtg
-6.5
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
rank_above · #117Jelizaveta NaidjonovaLATrank_below · #119Darina IvanovaLAT
//current_rank
#118
of 192 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#116
#117
#119
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
7.6
PPG
1.9
RPG
2.4
APG
0.9
SPG
0.3
BPG
23%
3P%
40%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #118
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.6
PPG
1.9
RPG
2.4
APG
1.4
TOV/G
1.1
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.6
P73
Playmaking
2.4
P80
Rebounding
1.9
P23
True shooting
40%
P44
Two-way impact
-7.3
P40
Stops
44%
P8
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
30%
18 made / 61 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
23%
8 made / 35 attempts
FT
Free throws
64%
9 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
57% of attempts from three
●2PA 26●3PA 35
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
53
PTS
7.6 / game
18–61
FGM–FGA
8–35
3PM–3PA
9–14
FTM–FTA
creation
17
AST
2.4 / game
10
TOV
1.4 / game
1.70×
AST:TOV
15
FD
rebounding
13
REB
1.9 / game
5
OREB
8
DREB
1.9
REB/G
defense
6
STL
0.9 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
10
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
38.7
HESI
45.5
PI
85.4
ORtg
92.8
DRtg
-7.3
NRtg
-5.4
Stable NRtg
44%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
3%
PIE
86.3
Team DRtg
-6.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.