ORtg
69.5
33rd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Darina Ivanova
LAT · b. 2010
//measurables
185 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileRebounding-led profile
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
4.0 RPGRebounding · 69th event percentile
1.1 stocksDefensive activity · 57th event percentile
- 37.2
- HESI v2.1
- #119
- of 192
- 62%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #119 of 192 · Provisional
HESI
37.2
Event performance
37th event percentile
PI
45.4
Prospect index
38th event percentile
ORtg
69.5
Points / 100 poss.
33rd event percentile
DRtg
79.6
Lower is better
64th event percentile
NRtg
-10.1
Two-way margin
38th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 69.5 · 33rd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 79.6 · Stop% 71.6% · Team DRtg 84.9
Sample context
7 games · 100 minutes · 62% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
4.0 RPG69th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.1 stocks57th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
37.2
37th event percentile
Prospect index
45.4
38th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
69.5
33rd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
79.6
64th event percentile
Two-way margin
-10.1
38th event percentile
Stop percentage
71.6%
85th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
2.0 PPG
21st event percentile
Creation
1.0 APG
45th event percentile
Rebounding
4.0 RPG
69th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.1 stocks
57th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
34.7% TS
32nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 37th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 69.5 ORtg and 79.6 DRtg, producing a -10.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are scoring load, scoring efficiency, and offensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 85th event percentile
Defensive stops
71.6% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 69th event percentile
Rebounding
4.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 21st event percentile
Scoring load
2.0 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
- 32nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
34.7% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 33rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
69.5 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
2.0 PPG
21st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
34.7%
32nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
35.7%
42nd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
35.7%
57th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
0.0%
context0.4 attempts per game
Free throws
28.6%
14th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.5%
43rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.0 APG
45th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
79.6
64th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.9
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+5.3
89th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
71.6%
85th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.1 STL+BLK
57th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
28.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-10.1
38th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-6.3
37th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
37.2
37th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
45.4
38th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
2.2%
45th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.0 RPG
69th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
99.9
context14.3 minutes per game.
Sample weight
62.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#119
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
560.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
2.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.0
APG
#119
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#119/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.0
APG
0.9
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
35%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.0
P21
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
4.0
P69
True shooting
35%
P32
Two-way impact
-10.1
P38
Stops
72%
P85
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
5 made / 14 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
29%
4 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
21% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
14
PTS
2.0 / game
5–14
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
4–14
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.0 / game
6
TOV
0.9 / game
1.17×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
28
REB
4.0 / game
5
OREB
23
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.6 / game
4
BLK
0.6 / game
14
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
37.2
HESI
45.4
PI
69.5
ORtg
79.6
DRtg
-10.1
NRtg
-6.3
Stable NRtg
72%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
2%
PIE
84.9
Team DRtg
+5.3
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#117
#118
#120
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
2.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.0
APG
0.6
SPG
0.6
BPG
0%
3P%
35%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #119
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.0
PPG
4.0
RPG
1.0
APG
0.9
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
35%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.0
P21
Playmaking
1.0
P45
Rebounding
4.0
P69
True shooting
35%
P32
Two-way impact
-10.1
P38
Stops
72%
P85
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
36%
5 made / 14 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
0%
0 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
29%
4 made / 14 attempts
Shot selection
21% of attempts from three
●2PA 11●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
14
PTS
2.0 / game
5–14
FGM–FGA
0–3
3PM–3PA
4–14
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.0 / game
6
TOV
0.9 / game
1.17×
AST:TOV
9
FD
rebounding
28
REB
4.0 / game
5
OREB
23
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.6 / game
4
BLK
0.6 / game
14
PF
8
STL+BLK
1.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
37.2
HESI
45.4
PI
69.5
ORtg
79.6
DRtg
-10.1
NRtg
-6.3
Stable NRtg
72%
Stop%
37%
Floor%
36%
eFG%
2%
PIE
84.9
Team DRtg
+5.3
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.