ORtg
60.1
24th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Pippa Gibb
CAN · b. 2010
//measurables
170 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led profile
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.7 APGCreation · 64th event percentile
0.8 stocksDefensive activity · 38th event percentile
- 25.6
- HESI v2.1
- #141
- of 192
- 50%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #141 of 192 · Provisional
HESI
25.6
Event performance
26th event percentile
PI
36.2
Prospect index
27th event percentile
ORtg
60.1
Points / 100 poss.
24th event percentile
DRtg
82.3
Lower is better
55th event percentile
NRtg
-22.2
Two-way margin
26th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 60.1 · 24th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 82.3 · Stop% 61.3% · Team DRtg 82.1
Sample context
6 games · 61 minutes · 50% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led profileevent-relative description
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
1.7 APG64th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks38th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
25.6
26th event percentile
Prospect index
36.2
27th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
60.1
24th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
82.3
55th event percentile
Two-way margin
-22.2
26th event percentile
Stop percentage
61.3%
65th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
2.0 PPG
21st event percentile
Creation
1.7 APG
64th event percentile
Rebounding
1.2 RPG
9th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.8 stocks
38th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
28.7% TS
19th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 26th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 60.1 ORtg and 82.3 DRtg, producing a -22.2 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are rebounding, scoring efficiency, and scoring load.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 9th event percentile
Rebounding
1.2 RPG
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.
- 19th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
28.7% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 21st event percentile
Scoring load
2.0 PPG
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
2.0 PPG
21st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
28.7%
19th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
27.5%
25th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
20.0%
15th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
16.7%
context3.0 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
35th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
24.2%
16th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.7 APG
64th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
82.3
55th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
82.1
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-0.1
66th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
61.3%
65th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.8 STL+BLK
38th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
14.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-22.2
26th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-11.1
26th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
25.6
26th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
36.2
27th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-0.2%
11th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
1.2 RPG
9th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
60.6
context10.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
50.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#141
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
540.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
6
GP
2.0
PPG
1.2
RPG
1.7
APG
#141
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#141/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.0
PPG
1.2
RPG
1.7
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
29%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.0
P21
Playmaking
1.7
P64
Rebounding
1.2
P9
True shooting
29%
P19
Two-way impact
-22.2
P26
Stops
61%
P65
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
20%
4 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
3 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
90% of attempts from three
●2PA 2●3PA 18
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
12
PTS
2.0 / game
4–20
FGM–FGA
3–18
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
7
REB
1.2 / game
3
OREB
4
DREB
1.2
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
7
PF
5
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
25.6
HESI
36.2
PI
60.1
ORtg
82.3
DRtg
-22.2
NRtg
-11.1
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
24%
Floor%
28%
eFG%
-0%
PIE
82.1
Team DRtg
-0.1
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#139
MEX
16.7 PPG 5.1 RPG 5.1 APG
//event_signalCreator5.1 APGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.3 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#140
#142
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
2.0
PPG
1.2
RPG
1.7
APG
0.8
SPG
0.0
BPG
17%
3P%
29%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #141
//quick_read
The line at a glance
2.0
PPG
1.2
RPG
1.7
APG
1.7
TOV/G
0.5
3PM/G
29%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
2.0
P21
Playmaking
1.7
P64
Rebounding
1.2
P9
True shooting
29%
P19
Two-way impact
-22.2
P26
Stops
61%
P65
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
20%
4 made / 20 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
3 made / 18 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
1 made / 2 attempts
Shot selection
90% of attempts from three
●2PA 2●3PA 18
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
12
PTS
2.0 / game
4–20
FGM–FGA
3–18
3PM–3PA
1–2
FTM–FTA
creation
10
AST
1.7 / game
10
TOV
1.7 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
3
FD
rebounding
7
REB
1.2 / game
3
OREB
4
DREB
1.2
REB/G
defense
5
STL
0.8 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
7
PF
5
STL+BLK
0.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
25.6
HESI
36.2
PI
60.1
ORtg
82.3
DRtg
-22.2
NRtg
-11.1
Stable NRtg
61%
Stop%
24%
Floor%
28%
eFG%
-0%
PIE
82.1
Team DRtg
-0.1
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.