ORtg
74.3
74th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
NGR · b. 2010
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//15_second_scouting_read
film-led profile4 public film items and a finalized scouting report create the clearest current read.
01
//film_room
Athlete submissions, event footage, and approved scout evidence, with provenance kept visible.
Highlights and full games — sourced from the athlete and event coverage.
Featured clip
ClipStarts muted. Turn sound on in the player.
Clip
vs vs Cameroon U18 · 2026-09-09 · scout: Fahd Wael
YouTube · approved scout evidence
Open source02
//human_evaluation
Manual scout observations stay distinct from statistical signals, with viewing basis and access level shown honestly.
//scouting_report · evidence_basis
Scouting report on file
Fahd Wael
Report date: 2026-09-09
Independent scout evaluation · role and translation first
// projected_role
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · post / mismatch option
forward · big · screen-and-roll finisher · short-roll connector · post / mismatch option. No separator is established yet
Translatable strengths
Not confirmed in this report.
Exploitable weaknesses
Not confirmed in this report.
Offensive translation
Projects to retain a primary role as a screen-and-roll finisher. Projects to retain a primary role as a short-roll connector. Projects to retain a primary role as a post / mismatch option. Projects to retain a primary role as a offensive rebounder.
Defensive assignments
primary low-man / back-line rotator (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary switch defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary post matchup defender (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold). primary rim protector (grade 3; assignment confirmed; workload should hold).
Best offensive fit
Offensive scheme fit remains unresolved.
Best defensive fit
Defensive scheme fit requires another assignment-confirmed viewing.
Limiting environments
No limiting environment should be stated until role evidence is representative.
Development priorities
No priority confirmed yet.
evidence_strength
strong
3 representative game samples reviewed.
pathway_hypothesis
Insufficient evidence
Insufficient evidence for a basketball pathway conclusion.
Evidence gates incomplete
Agreement and conflict stay visible; they are not averaged into one score.
Current event production
inconclusive76.6 performance rating · rank 32 · 6 games
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Estimated offensive efficiency
inconclusiveORtg 74.3 · descriptive event context, not a role projection
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Floor percentage context
inconclusive36.1% · possession outcome context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
Stop percentage context
inconclusive75.0% · box-score estimate with team and role context
Next: Add a representative full-game observation in the same skill area.
next_evaluation_assignment
Record scout confidence
03
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #32 of 142 · Established
HESI
76.6
Event performance
76th event percentile
PI
75.2
Prospect index
78th event percentile
ORtg
74.3
Points / 100 poss.
74th event percentile
DRtg
59.7
Lower is better
62nd event percentile
NRtg
+14.6
Two-way margin
72nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 74.3 · 74th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 59.7 · Stop% 75.0% · Team DRtg 62.0
Sample context
6 games · 156 minutes · 72% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
76.6
76th event percentile
Prospect index
75.2
78th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
74.3
74th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
59.7
62nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+14.6
72nd event percentile
Stop percentage
75.0%
77th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
6.0 PPG
71st event percentile
Creation
1.5 APG
68th event percentile
Rebounding
7.5 RPG
88th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.5 stocks
72nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
35.5% TS
57th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Rebounder
7.5 RPG · 88th event percentile
Activity
7.5 RPG + 2.5 defensive plays/G · 77th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 76th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 74.3 ORtg and 59.7 DRtg, producing a +14.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, defensive stops, and offensive efficiency.
Rebounding
7.5 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive stops
75.0% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Offensive efficiency
74.3 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
74.3
74th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
6.0 PPG
71st event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
35.5%
57th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
34.4%
65th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
33.3%
72nd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
10.0%
context1.7 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
53rd event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.1%
73rd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.5 APG
68th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
59.7
62nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
62.0
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+2.3
79th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
75.0%
77th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.5 STL+BLK
72nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
52.0
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+14.6
72nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+8.2
76th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
76.6
76th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
75.2
78th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
9.5%
86th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
7.5 RPG
88th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
156.2
context26.0 minutes per game.
Sample weight
72.3%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#32
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
543.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
04
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.0
PPG
7.5
RPG
1.5
APG
#32
RANK
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
6.0
PPG
7.5
RPG
1.5
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players
//current_rank
#32
of 142 ranked
05
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
6.0
PPG
7.5
RPG
1.5
APG
2.2
SPG
0.3
BPG
10%
3P%
36%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #32
//quick_read
6.0
PPG
7.5
RPG
1.5
APG
1.8
TOV/G
0.2
3PM/G
36%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
6.0
P71
Playmaking
1.5
P68
Rebounding
7.5
P88
True shooting
36%
P57
Two-way impact
+14.6
P72
Stops
75%
P77
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
33%
16 made / 48 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
10%
1 made / 10 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
21% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
36
PTS
6.0 / game
16–48
FGM–FGA
1–10
3PM–3PA
3–6
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.5 / game
11
TOV
1.8 / game
0.82×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
45
REB
7.5 / game
16
OREB
29
DREB
7.5
REB/G
defense
13
STL
2.2 / game
2
BLK
0.3 / game
21
PF
15
STL+BLK
2.5 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
76.6
HESI
75.2
PI
74.3
ORtg
59.7
DRtg
+14.6
NRtg
+8.2
Stable NRtg
75%
Stop%
36%
Floor%
34%
eFG%
9%
PIE
62.0
Team DRtg
+2.3
Def. lift
06
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.