ORtg
84.0
86th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Mariam Doucoure
Center · SEN · b. 2009
//measurables
186 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency-led profile
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalOffensive Impact84.0 ORtg · 86th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
58.1% TSScoring efficiency · 99th event percentile
5.2 PPGScoring load · 64th event percentile
- 78.0
- HESI v2.1
- #33
- of 142
- 58%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #33 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
78.0
Event performance
78th event percentile
PI
75.1
Prospect index
77th event percentile
ORtg
84.0
Points / 100 poss.
86th event percentile
DRtg
63.8
Lower is better
49th event percentile
NRtg
+20.2
Two-way margin
76th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 84.0 · 86th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 63.8 · Stop% 55.2% · Team DRtg 56.9
Sample context
5 games · 84 minutes · 58% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring efficiency and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
58.1% TS99th event percentile
Scoring load
5.2 PPG64th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
78.0
78th event percentile
Prospect index
75.1
77th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
84.0
86th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
63.8
49th event percentile
Two-way margin
+20.2
76th event percentile
Stop percentage
55.2%
22nd event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.2 PPG
64th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
18th event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG
42nd event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 stocks
42nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.1% TS
99th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P86
Offensive Impact
84.0 ORtg · 86th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 78th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 84.0 ORtg and 63.8 DRtg, producing a +20.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are scoring efficiency, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin. The lowest relative areas are creation and defensive stops.
Relative strengths
- 99th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
58.1% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 86th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
84.0 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions among the stronger results in this event.
- 76th event percentile
Two-way margin
+20.2 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 18th event percentile
Creation
0.2 APG
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
- 22nd event percentile
Defensive stops
55.2% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.2 PPG
64th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
58.1%
99th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
42.9%
91st event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
42.9%
95th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
73.7%
88th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
42.1%
88th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.2 APG
18th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
63.8
49th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
56.9
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-6.9
17th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
55.2%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.6 STL+BLK
42nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
19.6
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+20.2
76th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+8.2
78th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
78.0
78th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
75.1
77th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.1%
56th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.8 RPG
42nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
83.6
context16.7 minutes per game.
Sample weight
58.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#33
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
425.3
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
5.2
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.2
APG
#33
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#33/142view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.2
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.2
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.2
P64
Playmaking
0.2
P18
Rebounding
2.8
P42
True shooting
58%
P99
Two-way impact
+20.2
P76
Stops
55%
P22
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
43%
6 made / 14 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
74%
14 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 14●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
5.2 / game
6–14
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
14–19
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
10
TOV
2.0 / game
0.10×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.8 / game
4
OREB
10
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
2
BLK
0.4 / game
13
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
78.0
HESI
75.1
PI
84.0
ORtg
63.8
DRtg
+20.2
NRtg
+8.2
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
3%
PIE
56.9
Team DRtg
-6.9
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
rank_above · #32Zainab AdelajaNigeriarank_below · #34RAMATOU DISSAC · Côte d'Ivoire
//current_rank
#33
of 142 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
//event_signalScorer19.7 PPGComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor4.0 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#31
#32
Nigeria
6.0 PPG 7.5 RPG 1.5 APG
//event_signalActivity7.5 RPG + 2.5 defensive plays/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#34
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
5
GP
5.2
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.2
APG
0.2
SPG
0.4
BPG
—
3P%
58%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #33
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.2
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.2
APG
2.0
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
58%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.2
P64
Playmaking
0.2
P18
Rebounding
2.8
P42
True shooting
58%
P99
Two-way impact
+20.2
P76
Stops
55%
P22
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
43%
6 made / 14 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
74%
14 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 14●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
26
PTS
5.2 / game
6–14
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
14–19
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
0.2 / game
10
TOV
2.0 / game
0.10×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.8 / game
4
OREB
10
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
2
BLK
0.4 / game
13
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
78.0
HESI
75.1
PI
84.0
ORtg
63.8
DRtg
+20.2
NRtg
+8.2
Stable NRtg
55%
Stop%
42%
Floor%
43%
eFG%
3%
PIE
56.9
Team DRtg
-6.9
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.