ORtg
62.3
57th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Center · CIV · b. 2008
//measurables
192 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
39.8% TSScoring efficiency · 72nd event percentile
2.3 stocksDefensive activity · 69th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #34 of 142 · Provisional
HESI
79.4
Event performance
79th event percentile
PI
75.0
Prospect index
76th event percentile
ORtg
62.3
Points / 100 poss.
57th event percentile
DRtg
37.1
Lower is better
97th event percentile
NRtg
+25.2
Two-way margin
80th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 62.3 · 57th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 37.1 · Stop% 90.6% · Team DRtg 41.7
Sample context
6 games · 67 minutes · 53% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring efficiency
Defensive activity
Questions for film
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
79.4
79th event percentile
Prospect index
75.0
76th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
62.3
57th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
37.1
97th event percentile
Two-way margin
+25.2
80th event percentile
Stop percentage
90.6%
93rd event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
3.2 PPG
42nd event percentile
Creation
1.2 APG
57th event percentile
Rebounding
4.2 RPG
61st event percentile
Defensive activity
2.3 stocks
69th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
39.8% TS
72nd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Defensive Impact
37.1 DRtg · 91% Stop% · 95th event percentile
Rim Protection
1.2 BPG · 95th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 79th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 62.3 ORtg and 37.1 DRtg, producing a +25.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin.
Defensive efficiency
37.1 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Defensive stops
90.6% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Two-way margin
+25.2 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
62.3
57th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
3.2 PPG
42nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
39.8%
72nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
36.8%
73rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
36.8%
83rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
45.5%
38th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
32.4%
65th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.2 APG
57th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
37.1
97th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
41.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+4.6
86th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
90.6%
93rd event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.3 STL+BLK
69th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
27.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+25.2
80th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+9.2
79th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
79.4
79th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
75.0
76th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
11.7%
68th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.2 RPG
61st event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
66.9
context11.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
52.7%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#34
contextAmong 142 published players.
Team possessions
542.2
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
6
GP
3.2
PPG
4.2
RPG
1.2
APG
#34
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
//quick_read
3.2
PPG
4.2
RPG
1.2
APG
2.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
3.2
P42
Playmaking
1.2
P57
Rebounding
4.2
P61
True shooting
40%
P72
Two-way impact
+25.2
P80
Stops
91%
P93
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
37%
7 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
46%
5 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
19
PTS
3.2 / game
7–19
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
5–11
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.2 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
0.47×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
25
REB
4.2 / game
11
OREB
14
DREB
4.2
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
7
BLK
1.2 / game
9
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
79.4
HESI
75.0
PI
62.3
ORtg
37.1
DRtg
+25.2
NRtg
+9.2
Stable NRtg
91%
Stop%
32%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
12%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
+4.6
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.
//current_rank
#34
of 142 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
3.2
PPG
4.2
RPG
1.2
APG
1.2
SPG
1.2
BPG
—
3P%
40%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
6 GP · event rank #34
//quick_read
3.2
PPG
4.2
RPG
1.2
APG
2.5
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
40%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
3.2
P42
Playmaking
1.2
P57
Rebounding
4.2
P61
True shooting
40%
P72
Two-way impact
+25.2
P80
Stops
91%
P93
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
37%
7 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
46%
5 made / 11 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
19
PTS
3.2 / game
7–19
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
5–11
FTM–FTA
creation
7
AST
1.2 / game
15
TOV
2.5 / game
0.47×
AST:TOV
6
FD
rebounding
25
REB
4.2 / game
11
OREB
14
DREB
4.2
REB/G
defense
7
STL
1.2 / game
7
BLK
1.2 / game
9
PF
14
STL+BLK
2.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
79.4
HESI
75.0
PI
62.3
ORtg
37.1
DRtg
+25.2
NRtg
+9.2
Stable NRtg
91%
Stop%
32%
Floor%
37%
eFG%
12%
PIE
41.7
Team DRtg
+4.6
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.