back_to_rankings
Ray Darel Biyamba Nzila Star portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Ray Darel Biyamba Nzila Star

Point Guard · GAB · b. 2008

//measurables

175 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

2.4 APGCreation · 85th event percentile

1.8 stocksDefensive activity · 53rd event percentile

2.9
HESI v2.1
#135
of 138
68%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #135 of 138 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

2.9

Event performance

3rd event percentile

PI

13.8

Prospect index

3rd event percentile

ORtg

54.9

Points / 100 poss.

22nd event percentile

DRtg

97.8

Lower is better

4th event percentile

NRtg

-43.0

Two-way margin

13th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 54.9 · 22nd event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 97.8 · Stop% 51.4% · Team DRtg 96.4

Sample context

5 games · 129 minutes · 68% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

2.4 APG85th event percentile

Defensive activity

1.8 stocks53rd event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

  2. 02

    Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

2.9

3rd event percentile

Prospect index

13.8

3rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

54.9

22nd event percentile

Defensive efficiency

97.8

4th event percentile

Two-way margin

-43.0

13th event percentile

Stop percentage

51.4%

23rd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

4.8 PPG

47th event percentile

Creation

2.4 APG

85th event percentile

Rebounding

3.2 RPG

43rd event percentile

Defensive activity

1.8 stocks

53rd event percentile

Scoring efficiency

23.9% TS

17th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 3rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 54.9 ORtg and 97.8 DRtg, producing a -43.0 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and scoring efficiency.

Relative strengths

  1. Creation

    2.4 APG

    85th event percentile

    Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive efficiency

    97.8 DRtg

    4th event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

  2. Two-way margin

    -43.0 NRtg

    13th event percentile

    The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

  3. Scoring efficiency

    23.9% TS

    17th event percentile

    True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

54.9

22nd event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

4.8 PPG

47th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

23.9%

17th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

8.5%

10th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

7.3%

10th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

4.2%

context

4.8 attempts per game

Free throws

81.0%

91st event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

25.3%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.4 APG

85th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

97.8

4th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

96.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.5

50th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

51.4%

23rd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.8 STL+BLK

53rd event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

29.3

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-43.0

13th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-31.0

3rd event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

2.9

3rd event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

13.8

3rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-1.3%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

3.2 RPG

43rd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

129.4

context

25.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

68.3%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#135

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

441.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

4.8

PPG

3.2

RPG

2.4

APG

#135

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4

Regional · 2026

#7

RANK

57

FIELD

89%

PERCENTILE

13.3

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#135/138view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.8

PPG

3.2

RPG

2.4

APG

2.8

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

24%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.8

P47

Playmaking

2.4

P85

Rebounding

3.2

P43

True shooting

24%

P17

Two-way impact

-43.0

P13

Stops

51%

P23

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

7%

3 made / 41 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

4%

1 made / 24 attempts

FT

Free throws

81%

17 made / 21 attempts

Shot selection

59% of attempts from three

●2PA 17●3PA 24

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

24

PTS

4.8 / game

3–41

FGM–FGA

1–24

3PM–3PA

17–21

FTM–FTA

creation

12

AST

2.4 / game

14

TOV

2.8 / game

0.86×

AST:TOV

16

FD

rebounding

16

REB

3.2 / game

5

OREB

11

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

9

STL

1.8 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

9

PF

9

STL+BLK

1.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

2.9

HESI

13.8

PI

54.9

ORtg

97.8

DRtg

-43.0

NRtg

-31.0

Stable NRtg

51%

Stop%

25%

Floor%

9%

eFG%

-1%

PIE

96.4

Team DRtg

-1.5

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games129 minutes25.9 min/game68% sample weightrank #135 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4

Regional · 2026

//quick_read

The line at a glance

13.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

3.3

APG

3.0

TOV/G

3.7

3PM/G

53%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

13.3

P83

Playmaking

3.3

P94

Rebounding

2.7

P38

True shooting

53%

P83

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

37%

26 made / 71 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

41%

22 made / 54 attempts

FT

Free throws

60%

6 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

76% of attempts from three

●2PA 17●3PA 54

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

80

PTS

13.3 / game

26–71

FGM–FGA

22–54

3PM–3PA

6–10

FTM–FTA

creation

20

AST

3.3 / game

18

TOV

3.0 / game

1.11×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

16

REB

2.7 / game

5

OREB

11

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

9

STL

1.5 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

12

PF

9

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

52%

eFG%

4%

PIE

sample_context

6 gamesrank #7 of 57
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Emerick RAVELOARISON portrait#133

    Emerick RAVELOARISON

    Small Forward · Madagascar

    1.5 PPG 1.0 RPG 0.7 APG

  • Linx Samir Bekale Oniane portrait#134

    Linx Samir Bekale Oniane

    Shooting Guard · Gabon

    1.0 PPG 1.4 RPG 0.6 APG

  • Christopher Njerassem portrait#136

    Christopher Njerassem

    Point Guard · Chad

    0.7 PPG 0.5 RPG 1.0 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

13.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

3.3

APG

1.5

SPG

0.0

BPG

—

3P%

53%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #135

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.8

PPG

3.2

RPG

2.4

APG

2.8

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

24%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.8

P47

Playmaking

2.4

P85

Rebounding

3.2

P43

True shooting

24%

P17

Two-way impact

-43.0

P13

Stops

51%

P23

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

7%

3 made / 41 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

4%

1 made / 24 attempts

FT

Free throws

81%

17 made / 21 attempts

Shot selection

59% of attempts from three

●2PA 17●3PA 24

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

24

PTS

4.8 / game

3–41

FGM–FGA

1–24

3PM–3PA

17–21

FTM–FTA

creation

12

AST

2.4 / game

14

TOV

2.8 / game

0.86×

AST:TOV

16

FD

rebounding

16

REB

3.2 / game

5

OREB

11

DREB

3.2

REB/G

defense

9

STL

1.8 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

9

PF

9

STL+BLK

1.8 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

2.9

HESI

13.8

PI

54.9

ORtg

97.8

DRtg

-43.0

NRtg

-31.0

Stable NRtg

51%

Stop%

25%

Floor%

9%

eFG%

-1%

PIE

96.4

Team DRtg

-1.5

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games129 minutes25.9 min/game68% sample weightrank #135 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026

6 GP · event rank #7

//quick_read

The line at a glance

13.3

PPG

2.7

RPG

3.3

APG

3.0

TOV/G

3.7

3PM/G

53%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

13.3

P83

Playmaking

3.3

P94

Rebounding

2.7

P38

True shooting

53%

P83

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

37%

26 made / 71 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

41%

22 made / 54 attempts

FT

Free throws

60%

6 made / 10 attempts

Shot selection

76% of attempts from three

●2PA 17●3PA 54

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

80

PTS

13.3 / game

26–71

FGM–FGA

22–54

3PM–3PA

6–10

FTM–FTA

creation

20

AST

3.3 / game

18

TOV

3.0 / game

1.11×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

16

REB

2.7 / game

5

OREB

11

DREB

2.7

REB/G

defense

9

STL

1.5 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

12

PF

9

STL+BLK

1.5 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

52%

eFG%

4%

PIE

sample_context

6 gamesrank #7 of 57

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.