back_to_rankings
Linx Samir Bekale Oniane portrait
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Linx Samir Bekale Oniane

Shooting Guard · GAB · b. 2008

//measurables

180 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led profile

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

0.6 APGCreation · 34th event percentile

0.2 stocksDefensive activity · 20th event percentile

3.6
HESI v2.1
#134
of 138
40%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

2 events

Event context and history available

01

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #134 of 138 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

3.6

Event performance

4th event percentile

PI

14.4

Prospect index

3rd event percentile

ORtg

37.9

Points / 100 poss.

13th event percentile

DRtg

104.0

Lower is better

1st event percentile

NRtg

-66.1

Two-way margin

2nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 37.9 · 13th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 104.0 · Stop% 37.0% · Team DRtg 96.4

Sample context

5 games · 39 minutes · 40% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led profileevent-relative description

Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

0.6 APG34th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.2 stocks20th event percentile

Questions for film

  1. 01

    How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?

  2. 02

    Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

  3. 03

    Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

3.6

4th event percentile

Prospect index

14.4

3rd event percentile

Offensive efficiency

37.9

13th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

104.0

1st event percentile

Two-way margin

-66.1

2nd event percentile

Stop percentage

37.0%

4th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.0 PPG

15th event percentile

Creation

0.6 APG

34th event percentile

Rebounding

1.4 RPG

18th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.2 stocks

20th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

21.5% TS

16th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

PI

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 4th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 37.9 ORtg and 104.0 DRtg, producing a -66.1 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive stops.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

  1. Defensive efficiency

    104.0 DRtg

    1st event percentile

    The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.

  2. Two-way margin

    -66.1 NRtg

    2nd event percentile

    The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

  3. Defensive stops

    37.0% Stop%

    4th event percentile

    The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

37.9

13th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.0 PPG

15th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

21.5%

16th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

22.2%

23rd event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

22.2%

27th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.4 attempts per game

Free throws

16.7%

7th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

19.7%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.6 APG

34th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

104.0

1st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

96.4

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-7.6

10th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

37.0%

4th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.2 STL+BLK

20th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

6.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-66.1

2nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-29.4

4th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

3.6

4th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

14.4

3rd event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-1.7%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

1.4 RPG

18th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

5

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

39.4

context

7.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

39.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#134

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

441.0

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

  • The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
  • This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
  • Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

02

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

5

GP

1.0

PPG

1.4

RPG

0.6

APG

#134

RANK

//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4

Regional · 2026

#53

RANK

57

FIELD

7%

PERCENTILE

1.8

PPG

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#134/138view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.0

PPG

1.4

RPG

0.6

APG

1.6

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

22%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.0

P15

Playmaking

0.6

P34

Rebounding

1.4

P18

True shooting

22%

P16

Two-way impact

-66.1

P2

Stops

37%

P4

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

22%

2 made / 9 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 2 attempts

FT

Free throws

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

Shot selection

22% of attempts from three

●2PA 7●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

5

PTS

1.0 / game

2–9

FGM–FGA

0–2

3PM–3PA

1–6

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.6 / game

8

TOV

1.6 / game

0.38×

AST:TOV

4

FD

rebounding

7

REB

1.4 / game

5

OREB

2

DREB

1.4

REB/G

defense

1

STL

0.2 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

2

PF

1

STL+BLK

0.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

3.6

HESI

14.4

PI

37.9

ORtg

104.0

DRtg

-66.1

NRtg

-29.4

Stable NRtg

37%

Stop%

20%

Floor%

22%

eFG%

-2%

PIE

96.4

Team DRtg

-7.6

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games39 minutes7.9 min/game40% sample weightrank #134 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4

Regional · 2026

#53/57view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.8

PPG

1.5

RPG

0.2

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

20%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.8

P23

Playmaking

0.2

P16

Rebounding

1.5

P21

True shooting

20%

P15

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

9%

2 made / 22 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

7 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

32% of attempts from three

●2PA 15●3PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

11

PTS

1.8 / game

2–22

FGM–FGA

0–7

3PM–3PA

7–14

FTM–FTA

creation

1

AST

0.2 / game

6

TOV

1.0 / game

0.17×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

9

REB

1.5 / game

5

OREB

4

DREB

1.5

REB/G

defense

3

STL

0.5 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

2

PF

4

STL+BLK

0.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

9%

eFG%

0%

PIE

sample_context

6 gamesrank #53 of 57
around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.

more_from_this_event

More from this event

Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.

  • Nathan Djako portrait#1

    Nathan Djako

    Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire

    17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG

    //event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
  • Malik Adam Abiat portrait#132

    Malik Adam Abiat

    Chad

    1.6 PPG 0.6 RPG 1.0 APG

  • Emerick RAVELOARISON portrait#133

    Emerick RAVELOARISON

    Small Forward · Madagascar

    1.5 PPG 1.0 RPG 0.7 APG

  • Ray Darel Biyamba Nzila Star portrait#135

    Ray Darel Biyamba Nzila Star

    Point Guard · Gabon

    4.8 PPG 3.2 RPG 2.4 APG

03

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

6

GP

1.8

PPG

1.5

RPG

0.2

APG

0.5

SPG

0.2

BPG

—

3P%

20%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #134

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.0

PPG

1.4

RPG

0.6

APG

1.6

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

22%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.0

P15

Playmaking

0.6

P34

Rebounding

1.4

P18

True shooting

22%

P16

Two-way impact

-66.1

P2

Stops

37%

P4

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

22%

2 made / 9 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 2 attempts

FT

Free throws

17%

1 made / 6 attempts

Shot selection

22% of attempts from three

●2PA 7●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

5

PTS

1.0 / game

2–9

FGM–FGA

0–2

3PM–3PA

1–6

FTM–FTA

creation

3

AST

0.6 / game

8

TOV

1.6 / game

0.38×

AST:TOV

4

FD

rebounding

7

REB

1.4 / game

5

OREB

2

DREB

1.4

REB/G

defense

1

STL

0.2 / game

0

BLK

0.0 / game

2

PF

1

STL+BLK

0.2 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

3.6

HESI

14.4

PI

37.9

ORtg

104.0

DRtg

-66.1

NRtg

-29.4

Stable NRtg

37%

Stop%

20%

Floor%

22%

eFG%

-2%

PIE

96.4

Team DRtg

-7.6

Def. lift

sample_context

5 games39 minutes7.9 min/game40% sample weightrank #134 of 138

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026

6 GP · event rank #53

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.8

PPG

1.5

RPG

0.2

APG

1.0

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

20%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.8

P23

Playmaking

0.2

P16

Rebounding

1.5

P21

True shooting

20%

P15

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

FG

Field goals

9%

2 made / 22 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0%

0 made / 7 attempts

FT

Free throws

50%

7 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

32% of attempts from three

●2PA 15●3PA 7

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

11

PTS

1.8 / game

2–22

FGM–FGA

0–7

3PM–3PA

7–14

FTM–FTA

creation

1

AST

0.2 / game

6

TOV

1.0 / game

0.17×

AST:TOV

—

FD

rebounding

9

REB

1.5 / game

5

OREB

4

DREB

1.5

REB/G

defense

3

STL

0.5 / game

1

BLK

0.2 / game

2

PF

4

STL+BLK

0.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

9%

eFG%

0%

PIE

sample_context

6 gamesrank #53 of 57

04

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.