Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Malik Adam Abiat

CHA · b. 2008

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led profile

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

1.0 APGCreation · 51st event percentile

29.1% TSScoring efficiency · 26th event percentile

4.4
HESI v2.1: #132
of 138: 50%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #132 of 138 · Provisional

HESI v2.1

HESI

4.4

Event performance

5th event percentile

15.0

Prospect index

5th event percentile

ORtg

47.9

Points / 100 poss.

19th event percentile

DRtg

96.3

Lower is better

5th event percentile

NRtg

-48.4

Two-way margin

11th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 47.9 · 19th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 96.3 · Stop% 33.5% · Team DRtg 84.8

Sample context

5 games · 60 minutes · 50% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led profileevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

1.0 APG51st event percentile

Scoring efficiency

29.1% TS26th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

4.4

5th event percentile

Prospect index

15.0

5th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

47.9

19th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

96.3

5th event percentile

Two-way margin

-48.4

11th event percentile

Stop percentage

33.5%

3rd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

1.6 PPG

20th event percentile

Creation

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Rebounding

0.6 RPG

5th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.0 stocks

15th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

29.1% TS

26th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 5th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 47.9 ORtg and 96.3 DRtg, producing a -48.4 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are defensive stops, defensive efficiency, and rebounding.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Defensive stops
33.5% Stop%
3rd event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
Defensive efficiency
96.3 DRtg
5th event percentile
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Rebounding
0.6 RPG
5th event percentile
Rebounding production sits below much of the event pool and is an area to examine against role and size.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

47.9

19th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

1.6 PPG

20th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

29.1%

26th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

20.8%

20th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

16.7%

17th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

50.0%

context

0.4 attempts per game

Free throws

75.0%

84th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

21.0%

17th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

1.0 APG

51st event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

96.3

5th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

84.8

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-11.5

3rd event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

33.5%

3rd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.0 STL+BLK

15th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

8.3

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-48.4

11th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-26.9

5th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

4.4

5th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

15.0

5th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-1.4%

16th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

0.6 RPG

5th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

60.4

context

12.1 minutes per game.

Sample weight

50.2%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Provisional

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#132

context

Among 138 published players.

Team possessions

492.7

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

1.6

PPG

0.6

RPG

1.0

APG

#132

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#132/138view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

1.6

PPG

0.6

RPG

1.0

APG

1.6

TOV/G

0.2

3PM/G

29%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

1.6

P20

Playmaking

1.0

P51

Rebounding

0.6

True shooting

29%

P26

Two-way impact

-48.4

P11

Stops

34%

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

17%

2 made / 12 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

50%

1 made / 2 attempts

Free throws

75%

3 made / 4 attempts

Shot selection

17% of attempts from three

●2PA 10●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

1.6 / game

2–12

FGM–FGA

1–2

3PM–3PA

3–4

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

1.0 / game

TOV

1.6 / game

0.63×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

0.6 / game

OREB

DREB

0.6

REB/G

defense

STL

0.0 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.0 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

4.4

HESI

15.0

47.9

ORtg

96.3

DRtg

-48.4

NRtg

-26.9

Stable NRtg

34%

Stop%

21%

Floor%

21%

eFG%

-1%

PIE

84.8

Team DRtg

-11.5

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.

rank_above · #131Jérémie Bryan LEYIGUIPG · Gabon

//current_rank

#132

of 138 ranked

rank_below · #133Emerick RAVELOARISONSF · Madagascar

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

1.6

PPG

0.6

RPG

1.0

APG

0.0

SPG

0.0

BPG

50%

3P%

29%

TS%

event_stats