ORtg
60.7
32nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
RWA · b. 2008
Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket
//measurables
178 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
1.8 APGCreation · 75th event percentile
1.8 stocksDefensive activity · 68th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #130 of 138 · Established
HESI
5.8
Event performance
6th event percentile
PI
16.2
Prospect index
6th event percentile
ORtg
60.7
Points / 100 poss.
32nd event percentile
DRtg
91.5
Lower is better
14th event percentile
NRtg
-30.8
Two-way margin
22nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 60.7 · 32nd event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 91.5 · Stop% 52.6% · Team DRtg 88.4
Sample context
5 games · 133 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Defensive activity
Questions for film
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
5.8
6th event percentile
Prospect index
16.2
6th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
60.7
32nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
91.5
14th event percentile
Two-way margin
-30.8
22nd event percentile
Stop percentage
52.6%
26th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
5.4 PPG
52nd event percentile
Creation
1.8 APG
75th event percentile
Rebounding
3.4 RPG
45th event percentile
Defensive activity
1.8 stocks
68th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
37.1% TS
53rd event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 6th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 60.7 ORtg and 91.5 DRtg, producing a -30.8 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation and defensive activity. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive stops.
Creation
1.8 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Defensive activity
1.8 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
Defensive efficiency
91.5 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Two-way margin
-30.8 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Defensive stops
52.6% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
60.7
32nd event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
5.4 PPG
52nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
37.1%
53rd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
34.4%
53rd event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
31.3%
57th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
16.7%
context2.4 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
45th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
29.1%
29th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.8 APG
75th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
91.5
14th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
88.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-3.1
38th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
52.6%
26th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
1.8 STL+BLK
68th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
29.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-30.8
22nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-22.9
6th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
5.8
6th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
16.2
6th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.8%
40th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
3.4 RPG
45th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
132.6
context26.5 minutes per game.
Sample weight
68.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#130
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
421.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
5.4
PPG
3.4
RPG
1.8
APG
#130
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#49
RANK
70
FIELD
30%
PERCENTILE
1.3
PPG
Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
5.4
PPG
3.4
RPG
1.8
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
4
GP
1.3
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.5
APG
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 138 ranked players
//current_rank
#130
of 138 ranked
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
4
GP
1.3
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.5
APG
0.8
SPG
0.3
BPG
—
3P%
31%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #130
//quick_read
5.4
PPG
3.4
RPG
1.8
APG
3.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
37%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
5.4
P52
Playmaking
1.8
P75
Rebounding
3.4
P45
True shooting
37%
P53
Two-way impact
-30.8
P22
Stops
53%
P26
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
31%
10 made / 32 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
17%
2 made / 12 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
5 made / 10 attempts
Shot selection
38% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
27
PTS
5.4 / game
10–32
FGM–FGA
2–12
3PM–3PA
5–10
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.8 / game
17
TOV
3.4 / game
0.53×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
17
REB
3.4 / game
5
OREB
12
DREB
3.4
REB/G
defense
8
STL
1.6 / game
1
BLK
0.2 / game
8
PF
9
STL+BLK
1.8 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
5.8
HESI
16.2
PI
60.7
ORtg
91.5
DRtg
-30.8
NRtg
-22.9
Stable NRtg
53%
Stop%
29%
Floor%
34%
eFG%
2%
PIE
88.4
Team DRtg
-3.1
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 52026
4 GP · event rank #49
//quick_read
1.3
PPG
2.3
RPG
1.5
APG
3.3
TOV/G
0.3
3PM/G
31%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
1.3
P21
Playmaking
1.5
P61
Rebounding
2.3
P31
True shooting
31%
P30
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
25%
2 made / 8 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
1 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
—
0 made / 0 attempts
Shot selection
38% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
5
PTS
1.3 / game
2–8
FGM–FGA
1–3
3PM–3PA
0–0
FTM–FTA
creation
6
AST
1.5 / game
13
TOV
3.3 / game
0.46×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
9
REB
2.3 / game
1
OREB
8
DREB
2.3
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.8 / game
1
BLK
0.3 / game
6
PF
4
STL+BLK
1.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
31%
eFG%
0%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.