ORtg
64.8
36th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026
Jérémie Bryan LEYIGUI
Point Guard · GAB
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileScoring load-led profile
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
5.6 PPGScoring load · 54th event percentile
2.8 RPGRebounding · 35th event percentile
- 5.1
- HESI v2.1
- #131
- of 138
- 62%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
Rank #131 of 138 · Provisional
HESI
5.1
Event performance
5th event percentile
PI
15.6
Prospect index
5th event percentile
ORtg
64.8
Points / 100 poss.
36th event percentile
DRtg
102.2
Lower is better
2nd event percentile
NRtg
-37.4
Two-way margin
15th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 64.8 · 36th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 102.2 · Stop% 41.1% · Team DRtg 96.4
Sample context
5 games · 96 minutes · 62% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Scoring load-led profileevent-relative description
Scoring load and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Scoring load
5.6 PPG54th event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG35th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
- 03
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
5.1
5th event percentile
Prospect index
15.6
5th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
64.8
36th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
102.2
2nd event percentile
Two-way margin
-37.4
15th event percentile
Stop percentage
41.1%
7th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
5.6 PPG
54th event percentile
Creation
0.4 APG
26th event percentile
Rebounding
2.8 RPG
35th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.6 stocks
31st event percentile
Scoring efficiency
33.1% TS
35th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 5th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 64.8 ORtg and 102.2 DRtg, producing a -37.4 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, defensive stops, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.
Relative weaknesses
- 2nd event percentile
Defensive efficiency
102.2 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
- 7th event percentile
Defensive stops
41.1% Stop%
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.
- 15th event percentile
Two-way margin
-37.4 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
5.6 PPG
54th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
33.1%
35th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
18.2%
16th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
15.2%
15th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
9.5%
context4.2 attempts per game
Free throws
76.2%
88th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
30.0%
34th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
0.4 APG
26th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
102.2
2nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
96.4
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-5.8
20th event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
41.1%
7th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.6 STL+BLK
31st event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
17.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-37.4
15th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-25.1
5th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
5.1
5th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
15.6
5th event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
-0.4%
16th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
2.8 RPG
35th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
5
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
96.0
context19.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
61.5%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#131
contextAmong 138 published players.
Team possessions
441.0
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
5
GP
5.6
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.4
APG
#131
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#27
RANK
57
FIELD
54%
PERCENTILE
10.7
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket
Continental · 2026
#131/138view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.6
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.4
APG
2.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.6
P54
Playmaking
0.4
P26
Rebounding
2.8
P35
True shooting
33%
P35
Two-way impact
-37.4
P15
Stops
41%
P7
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
15%
5 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
10%
2 made / 21 attempts
FT
Free throws
76%
16 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
64% of attempts from three
●2PA 12●3PA 21
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
28
PTS
5.6 / game
5–33
FGM–FGA
2–21
3PM–3PA
16–21
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.4 / game
12
TOV
2.4 / game
0.17×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.8 / game
6
OREB
8
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
1
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
5.1
HESI
15.6
PI
64.8
ORtg
102.2
DRtg
-37.4
NRtg
-25.1
Stable NRtg
41%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
18%
eFG%
-0%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
-5.8
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4
Regional · 2026
#27/57view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.7
PPG
3.2
RPG
2.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.7
P76
Playmaking
2.0
P77
Rebounding
3.2
P45
True shooting
43%
P65
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
26%
16 made / 61 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
24%
9 made / 38 attempts
FT
Free throws
77%
23 made / 30 attempts
Shot selection
62% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 38
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
64
PTS
10.7 / game
16–61
FGM–FGA
9–38
3PM–3PA
23–30
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
0.86×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
19
REB
3.2 / game
3
OREB
16
DREB
3.2
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
34%
eFG%
3%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 138 ranked players.
rank_above · #130Ishimwe David KazanezaRwandarank_below · #132Malik Adam AbiatChad
//current_rank
#131
of 138 ranked
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026.
#1
Shooting Guard · Côte d'Ivoire
17.5 PPG 4.5 RPG 1.3 APG
//event_signalTop 3#1 event rankComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#129
#130
#132
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 4 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
10.7
PPG
3.2
RPG
2.0
APG
0.7
SPG
0.0
BPG
—
3P%
43%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026
5 GP · event rank #131
//quick_read
The line at a glance
5.6
PPG
2.8
RPG
0.4
APG
2.4
TOV/G
0.4
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
5.6
P54
Playmaking
0.4
P26
Rebounding
2.8
P35
True shooting
33%
P35
Two-way impact
-37.4
P15
Stops
41%
P7
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
15%
5 made / 33 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
10%
2 made / 21 attempts
FT
Free throws
76%
16 made / 21 attempts
Shot selection
64% of attempts from three
●2PA 12●3PA 21
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
28
PTS
5.6 / game
5–33
FGM–FGA
2–21
3PM–3PA
16–21
FTM–FTA
creation
2
AST
0.4 / game
12
TOV
2.4 / game
0.17×
AST:TOV
11
FD
rebounding
14
REB
2.8 / game
6
OREB
8
DREB
2.8
REB/G
defense
3
STL
0.6 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
1
PF
3
STL+BLK
0.6 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
5.1
HESI
15.6
PI
64.8
ORtg
102.2
DRtg
-37.4
NRtg
-25.1
Stable NRtg
41%
Stop%
30%
Floor%
18%
eFG%
-0%
PIE
96.4
Team DRtg
-5.8
Def. lift
FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Men — Zone 42026
6 GP · event rank #27
//quick_read
The line at a glance
10.7
PPG
3.2
RPG
2.0
APG
2.3
TOV/G
1.5
3PM/G
43%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
10.7
P76
Playmaking
2.0
P77
Rebounding
3.2
P45
True shooting
43%
P65
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
26%
16 made / 61 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
24%
9 made / 38 attempts
FT
Free throws
77%
23 made / 30 attempts
Shot selection
62% of attempts from three
●2PA 23●3PA 38
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
64
PTS
10.7 / game
16–61
FGM–FGA
9–38
3PM–3PA
23–30
FTM–FTA
creation
12
AST
2.0 / game
14
TOV
2.3 / game
0.86×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
19
REB
3.2 / game
3
OREB
16
DREB
3.2
REB/G
defense
4
STL
0.7 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
2
PF
4
STL+BLK
0.7 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
34%
eFG%
3%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.