ORtg
98.4
76th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Jemyma Manyok
AUS · b. 2009
//measurables
195 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileTwo-way event impact
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRim Protection2.3 BPG · 99th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalTwo-Way Impact+24.2 Net Rating · 80th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
4.9 RPGRebounding · 78th event percentile
2.4 stocksDefensive activity · 55th event percentile
- 83.3
- HESI v2.1
- #33
- of 192
- 62%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #33 of 192 · Provisional
HESI
83.3
Event performance
83rd event percentile
PI
81.1
Prospect index
83rd event percentile
ORtg
98.4
Points / 100 poss.
76th event percentile
DRtg
74.1
Lower is better
78th event percentile
NRtg
+24.2
Two-way margin
82nd event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 98.4 · 76th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 74.1 · Stop% 72.7% · Team DRtg 77.7
Sample context
7 games · 99 minutes · 62% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Two-way event impactevent-relative description
Rebounding and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Rebounding
4.9 RPG78th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.4 stocks55th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
- 03
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
83.3
83rd event percentile
Prospect index
81.1
83rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
98.4
76th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
74.1
78th event percentile
Two-way margin
+24.2
82nd event percentile
Stop percentage
72.7%
87th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.9 PPG
43rd event percentile
Creation
1.3 APG
53rd event percentile
Rebounding
4.9 RPG
78th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.4 stocks
55th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
41.5% TS
47th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P99
Rim Protection
2.3 BPG · 99th event percentile
- P80
Two-Way Impact
+24.2 Net Rating · 80th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 83rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 98.4 ORtg and 74.1 DRtg, producing a +24.2 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, two-way margin, and defensive efficiency.
Relative strengths
- 87th event percentile
Defensive stops
72.7% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 82nd event percentile
Two-way margin
+24.2 NRtg
The gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency is a clear positive separator in this event.
- 78th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
74.1 DRtg
The favorable defensive percentile reflects a lower player DRtg relative to this event pool.
Relative weaknesses
No available metric falls at or below the 40th event percentile. Film may still reveal skill-level weaknesses.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.9 PPG
43rd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
41.5%
47th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
37.9%
50th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
37.9%
63rd event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Free throws
62.5%
56th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
48.3%
84th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
1.3 APG
53rd event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
74.1
78th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
77.7
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+3.5
86th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
72.7%
87th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.4 STL+BLK
55th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
26.4
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
+24.2
82nd event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
+15.2
83rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
83.3
83rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
81.1
83rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
5.4%
77th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.9 RPG
78th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
98.8
context14.1 minutes per game.
Sample weight
62.2%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Provisional
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#33
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
515.1
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
3.9
PPG
4.9
RPG
1.3
APG
#33
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#33/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.9
PPG
4.9
RPG
1.3
APG
0.7
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
42%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.9
P43
Playmaking
1.3
P53
Rebounding
4.9
P78
True shooting
42%
P47
Two-way impact
+24.2
P82
Stops
73%
P87
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
11 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
63%
5 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 29●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
27
PTS
3.9 / game
11–29
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
5–8
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.3 / game
5
TOV
0.7 / game
1.80×
AST:TOV
5
FD
rebounding
34
REB
4.9 / game
13
OREB
21
DREB
4.9
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.1 / game
16
BLK
2.3 / game
10
PF
17
STL+BLK
2.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
83.3
HESI
81.1
PI
98.4
ORtg
74.1
DRtg
+24.2
NRtg
+15.2
Stable NRtg
73%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
5%
PIE
77.7
Team DRtg
+3.5
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#31
Canada
12.3 PPG 7.1 RPG 0.9 APG
//event_signalShooter37% 3PT on 2.7 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#32
#34
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
3.9
PPG
4.9
RPG
1.3
APG
0.1
SPG
2.3
BPG
—
3P%
42%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #33
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.9
PPG
4.9
RPG
1.3
APG
0.7
TOV/G
0.0
3PM/G
42%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.9
P43
Playmaking
1.3
P53
Rebounding
4.9
P78
True shooting
42%
P47
Two-way impact
+24.2
P82
Stops
73%
P87
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
38%
11 made / 29 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
—
0 made / 0 attempts
FT
Free throws
63%
5 made / 8 attempts
Shot selection
0% of attempts from three
●2PA 29●3PA 0
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
27
PTS
3.9 / game
11–29
FGM–FGA
0–0
3PM–3PA
5–8
FTM–FTA
creation
9
AST
1.3 / game
5
TOV
0.7 / game
1.80×
AST:TOV
5
FD
rebounding
34
REB
4.9 / game
13
OREB
21
DREB
4.9
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.1 / game
16
BLK
2.3 / game
10
PF
17
STL+BLK
2.4 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
83.3
HESI
81.1
PI
98.4
ORtg
74.1
DRtg
+24.2
NRtg
+15.2
Stable NRtg
73%
Stop%
48%
Floor%
38%
eFG%
5%
PIE
77.7
Team DRtg
+3.5
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.