Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Frances Vollett

CAN · b. 2009

//measurables

183 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Efficient scoring profile

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

7.1 RPGRebounding · 93rd event percentile

12.3 PPGScoring load · 92nd event percentile

84.8
HESI v2.1: #31
of 192: 78%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #31 of 192 · High confidence

HESI v2.1

HESI

84.8

Event performance

85th event percentile

82.4

Prospect index

84th event percentile

ORtg

104.5

Points / 100 poss.

85th event percentile

DRtg

83.5

Lower is better

50th event percentile

NRtg

+21.1

Two-way margin

82nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 104.5 · 85th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 83.5 · Stop% 58.6% · Team DRtg 82.1

Sample context

7 games · 208 minutes · 78% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Efficient scoring profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

7.1 RPG93rd event percentile

Scoring load

12.3 PPG92nd event percentile

Questions for film

01
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

84.8

85th event percentile

Prospect index

82.4

84th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

104.5

85th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

83.5

50th event percentile

Two-way margin

+21.1

82nd event percentile

Stop percentage

58.6%

55th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

12.3 PPG

92nd event percentile

Creation

0.9 APG

40th event percentile

Rebounding

7.1 RPG

93rd event percentile

Defensive activity

1.9 stocks

75th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

55.5% TS

90th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P93
Rebounder
7.1 RPG · 93rd event percentile
P92
Scorer
12.3 PPG · 92nd event percentile
P90
Event Efficiency
56% TS on 12.3 PPG · 90th event percentile
P90
Rim Protection
1.0 BPG · 90th event percentile
Shooter
37% 3PT on 2.7 3PA/G
P81
Activity
7.1 RPG + 1.9 defensive plays/G · 81st event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 85th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 104.5 ORtg and 83.5 DRtg, producing a +21.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are rebounding, scoring load, and scoring efficiency. The lowest relative area is creation.

Relative strengths

Rebounding
7.1 RPG
93rd event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Scoring load
12.3 PPG
92nd event percentile
Scoring volume stands out relative to players in the same published event pool.
Scoring efficiency
55.5% TS
90th event percentile
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.

Relative weaknesses

Creation
0.9 APG
40th event percentile
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

104.5

85th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

12.3 PPG

92nd event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

55.5%

90th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

49.2%

84th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

43.9%

85th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

36.8%

context

2.7 attempts per game

Free throws

80.8%

85th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

47.4%

83rd event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.9 APG

40th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

83.5

50th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

82.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.3

59th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

58.6%

55th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

1.9 STL+BLK

75th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

47.0

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

+21.1

82nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

+16.4

85th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

84.8

85th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

82.4

84th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

11.1%

94th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

7.1 RPG

93rd event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

207.8

context

29.7 minutes per game.

Sample weight

77.6%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

High confidence

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#31

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

540.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

12.3

PPG

7.1

RPG

0.9

APG

#31

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#31/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

12.3

PPG

7.1

RPG

0.9

APG

2.3

TOV/G

1.0

3PM/G

56%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

12.3

P92

Playmaking

0.9

P40

Rebounding

7.1

P93

True shooting

56%

P90

Two-way impact

+21.1

P82

Stops

59%

P55

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

44%

29 made / 66 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

37%

7 made / 19 attempts

Free throws

81%

21 made / 26 attempts

Shot selection

29% of attempts from three

●2PA 47●3PA 19

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

12.3 / game

29–66

FGM–FGA

7–19

3PM–3PA

21–26

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.9 / game

TOV

2.3 / game

0.38×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

7.1 / game

OREB

DREB

7.1

REB/G

defense

STL

0.9 / game

BLK

1.0 / game

STL+BLK

1.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

84.8

HESI

82.4

104.5

ORtg

83.5

DRtg

+21.1

NRtg

+16.4

Stable NRtg

59%

Stop%

47%

Floor%

49%

eFG%

11%

PIE

82.1

Team DRtg

-1.3

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #30Jordyn NohrCanada

//current_rank

#31

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #32Ran KobayashiJPN

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

12.3

PPG

7.1

RPG

0.9

APG

0.9

SPG

1.0

BPG

37%

3P%

56%

TS%

event_stats