Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player

Amy Colle Fall

Center · SEN · b. 2008

Latest event year on file: 2026FIBA U18 AfroBasket

//measurables

185 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Scoring efficiency-led profile

Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

28.6% TSScoring efficiency · 40th event percentile

0.6 stocksDefensive activity · 40th event percentile

35.5
HESI v2.1: #93
of 142: 45%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #93 of 142 · Limited sample

HESI v2.1

HESI

35.5

Event performance

36th event percentile

39.9

Prospect index

35th event percentile

ORtg

34.8

Points / 100 poss.

24th event percentile

DRtg

60.1

Lower is better

61st event percentile

NRtg

-25.3

Two-way margin

32nd event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 34.8 · 24th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 60.1 · Stop% 64.4% · Team DRtg 56.9

Sample context

5 games · 49 minutes · 45% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Scoring efficiency-led profileevent-relative description

Scoring efficiency and Defensive activity are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Scoring efficiency

28.6% TS40th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.6 stocks40th event percentile

Questions for film

01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
02
Does the film show repeatable advantage creation or mostly connective passing?
03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

35.5

36th event percentile

Prospect index

39.9

35th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

34.8

24th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

60.1

61st event percentile

Two-way margin

-25.3

32nd event percentile

Stop percentage

64.4%

42nd event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

0.8 PPG

11th event percentile

Creation

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Rebounding

2.2 RPG

36th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.6 stocks

40th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

28.6% TS

40th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

Automated signals and full statistical interpretation

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 36th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 34.8 ORtg and 60.1 DRtg, producing a -25.3 Net Rating. The lowest relative areas are creation, scoring load, and offensive efficiency.

Relative strengths

No available metric currently clears the 65th event percentile.

Relative weaknesses

Creation
0.0 APG
6th event percentile
Assist production is a lower relative area; the model cannot determine unrecorded creation or role constraints.
Scoring load
0.8 PPG
11th event percentile
Scoring volume is a lower relative part of this event profile.
Offensive efficiency
34.8 ORtg
24th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

34.8

24th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

0.8 PPG

11th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

28.6%

40th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

28.6%

48th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

28.6%

54th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Floor%

17.2%

24th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.0 APG

6th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

60.1

61st event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

56.9

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.2

36th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

64.4%

42nd event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.6 STL+BLK

40th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

13.4

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-25.3

32nd event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-16.0

36th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

35.5

36th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

39.9

35th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

-0.9%

22nd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.2 RPG

36th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

48.9

context

9.8 minutes per game.

Sample weight

44.9%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Limited sample

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#93

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

425.3

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

0.8

PPG

2.2

RPG

0.0

APG

#93

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Published competitions, strongest first. Open the statistical record for the complete event line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#93/142Event board →

0.8

PPG

2.2

RPG

0.0

APG

Full statistics →

event_context

Event context

FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 · 142 ranked players

rank_above · #92Josephine AMINATUganda

//current_rank

#93

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #94Vivan Moraa RatemoKenya

#1
Couda Keita
Point Guard · Mali
19.7 PPG 4.5 RPG 3.2 APG
#91
Agnes Nyamangu Gichuri
Kenya
0.6 PPG 0.4 RPG 0.2 APG

//statistical_record

Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.

key_stats

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

0.8

PPG

2.2

RPG

0.0

APG

0.4

SPG

0.2

BPG

—

3P%

29%

TS%

event_stats

Event production

Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

5 GP · event rank #93

//quick_read

The line at a glance

0.8

PPG

2.2

RPG

0.0

APG

1.2

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

29%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

0.8

P11

Playmaking

0.0

Rebounding

2.2

P36

True shooting

29%

P40

Two-way impact

-25.3

P32

Stops

64%

P42

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

29%

2 made / 7 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Free throws

—

0 made / 0 attempts

Shot selection

0% of attempts from three

●2PA 7●3PA 0

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

0.8 / game

2–7

FGM–FGA

0–0

3PM–3PA

0–0

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.0 / game

TOV

1.2 / game

0.00×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.2 / game

OREB

DREB

2.2

REB/G

defense

STL

0.4 / game

BLK

0.2 / game

STL+BLK

0.6 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

35.5

HESI

39.9

34.8

ORtg

60.1

DRtg

-25.3

NRtg

-16.0

Stable NRtg

64%

Stop%

17%

Floor%

29%

eFG%

-1%

PIE

56.9

Team DRtg

-3.2

Def. lift

//player_context

Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.

player_context

The person behind the numbers

Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.

claim_this_profile

Is this you?

This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.

CLAIM_THIS_PROFILE

data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.