Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026

Josephine AMINAT

UGA · b. 2009

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Rebounding-led profile

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

automated_event_signals

9.0 RPGRebounding · 94th event percentile

3.3 PPGScoring load · 45th event percentile

34.0
HESI v2.1: #92
of 142: 65%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U18 AfroBasket2026

Rank #92 of 142 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

34.0

Event performance

34th event percentile

39.9

Prospect index

36th event percentile

ORtg

44.8

Points / 100 poss.

34th event percentile

DRtg

65.4

Lower is better

45th event percentile

NRtg

-20.6

Two-way margin

39th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 44.8 · 34th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 65.4 · Stop% 65.9% · Team DRtg 64.0

Sample context

6 games · 114 minutes · 65% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Rebounding-led profileevent-relative description

Rebounding and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Rebounding

9.0 RPG94th event percentile

Scoring load

3.3 PPG45th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
02
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

34.0

34th event percentile

Prospect index

39.9

36th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

44.8

34th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

65.4

45th event percentile

Two-way margin

-20.6

39th event percentile

Stop percentage

65.9%

50th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

3.3 PPG

45th event percentile

Creation

0.8 APG

45th event percentile

Rebounding

9.0 RPG

94th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.7 stocks

38th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

31.1% TS

45th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

P94
Rebounder
9.0 RPG · 94th event percentile

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 34th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 44.8 ORtg and 65.4 DRtg, producing a -20.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is rebounding. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, defensive activity, and two-way margin.

Relative strengths

Rebounding
9.0 RPG
94th event percentile
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.

Relative weaknesses

Offensive efficiency
44.8 ORtg
34th event percentile
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
Defensive activity
0.7 steals + blocks/G
38th event percentile
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
Two-way margin
-20.6 NRtg
39th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

44.8

34th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

3.3 PPG

45th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

31.1%

45th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

33.3%

60th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

33.3%

72nd event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

0.0%

context

0.3 attempts per game

Free throws

0.0%

5th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

22.3%

35th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

0.8 APG

45th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

65.4

45th event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

64.0

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-1.4

50th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

65.9%

50th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.7 STL+BLK

38th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

37.7

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-20.6

39th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-16.4

34th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

34.0

34th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

39.9

36th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

1.2%

56th event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

9.0 RPG

94th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

113.7

context

18.9 minutes per game.

Sample weight

65.5%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#92

context

Among 142 published players.

Team possessions

604.7

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

3.3

PPG

9.0

RPG

0.8

APG

#92

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U18 AfroBasket

Continental · 2026

#92/142view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

3.3

PPG

9.0

RPG

0.8

APG

3.8

TOV/G

0.0

3PM/G

31%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

3.3

P45

Playmaking

0.8

P45

Rebounding

9.0

P94

True shooting

31%

P45

Two-way impact

-20.6

P39

Stops

66%

P50

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

33%

10 made / 30 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

0 made / 2 attempts

Free throws

0 made / 5 attempts

Shot selection

7% of attempts from three

●2PA 28●3PA 2

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

3.3 / game

10–30

FGM–FGA

0–2

3PM–3PA

0–5

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

0.8 / game

TOV

3.8 / game

0.22×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

9.0 / game

OREB

DREB

9.0

REB/G

defense

STL

0.5 / game

BLK

0.2 / game

STL+BLK

0.7 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

34.0

HESI

39.9

44.8

ORtg

65.4

DRtg

-20.6

NRtg

-16.4

Stable NRtg

66%

Stop%

22%

Floor%

33%

eFG%

PIE

64.0

Team DRtg

-1.4

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U18 AfroBasket 2026 — 142 ranked players.

rank_above · #91Agnes Nyamangu GichuriKenya

//current_rank

#92

of 142 ranked

rank_below · #93Amy Colle FallC · Senegal

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U18 AfroBasket · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

3.3

PPG

9.0

RPG

0.8

APG

0.5

SPG

0.2

BPG

3P%

31%

TS%

event_stats