ORtg
60.3
24th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Joudi Elsayed
EGY · b. 2009
//measurables
185 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileDefensive activity-led profile
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalRim Protection1.1 BPG · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.3 steals + blocks per game · 92nd event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalActivity4.3 RPG + 3.3 defensive plays/G · 85th event percentileComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
3.3 stocksDefensive activity · 92nd event percentile
2.3 APGCreation · 77th event percentile
- 24.1
- HESI v2.1
- #148
- of 192
- 75%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
2 events
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #148 of 192 · Established
HESI
24.1
Event performance
24th event percentile
PI
33.8
Prospect index
23rd event percentile
ORtg
60.3
Points / 100 poss.
24th event percentile
DRtg
75.8
Lower is better
75th event percentile
NRtg
-15.5
Two-way margin
30th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 60.3 · 24th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 75.8 · Stop% 75.1% · Team DRtg 81.3
Sample context
7 games · 177 minutes · 75% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Defensive activity-led profileevent-relative description
Defensive activity and Creation are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Defensive activity
3.3 stocks92nd event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG77th event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
- 02
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
24.1
24th event percentile
Prospect index
33.8
23rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
60.3
24th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
75.8
75th event percentile
Two-way margin
-15.5
30th event percentile
Stop percentage
75.1%
90th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
7.1 PPG
69th event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG
77th event percentile
Rebounding
4.3 RPG
72nd event percentile
Defensive activity
3.3 stocks
92nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
32.2% TS
26th event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
- P92
Rim Protection
1.1 BPG · 92nd event percentile
- P92
Disruptor
3.3 steals + blocks per game · 92nd event percentile
- P85
Activity
4.3 RPG + 3.3 defensive plays/G · 85th event percentile
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 24th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 60.3 ORtg and 75.8 DRtg, producing a -15.5 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive activity, defensive stops, and creation. The lowest relative areas are offensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 92nd event percentile
Defensive activity
3.3 steals + blocks/G
Steals and blocks show strong recorded defensive activity, without proving on-ball technique by themselves.
- 90th event percentile
Defensive stops
75.1% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
- 77th event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Relative weaknesses
- 24th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
60.3 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 26th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
32.2% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
- 30th event percentile
Two-way margin
-15.5 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
7.1 PPG
69th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
32.2%
26th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
29.7%
28th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
25.0%
26th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
22.2%
context3.9 attempts per game
Free throws
38.7%
20th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
28.7%
25th event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.3 APG
77th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
75.8
75th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
81.3
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+5.5
90th event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
75.1%
90th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
3.3 STL+BLK
92nd event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
52.2
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-15.5
30th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-11.5
24th event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
24.1
24th event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
33.8
23rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
1.2%
35th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.3 RPG
72nd event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
176.5
context25.2 minutes per game.
Sample weight
74.6%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#148
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
550.9
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
7.1
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.3
APG
#148
RANK
//best_ranking_evidence · strongest_finish
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#15
RANK
48
FIELD
70%
PERCENTILE
7.0
PPG
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#148/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.1
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.3
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.9
3PM/G
32%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.1
P69
Playmaking
2.3
P77
Rebounding
4.3
P72
True shooting
32%
P26
Two-way impact
-15.5
P30
Stops
75%
P90
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
25%
16 made / 64 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
6 made / 27 attempts
FT
Free throws
39%
12 made / 31 attempts
Shot selection
42% of attempts from three
●2PA 37●3PA 27
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
50
PTS
7.1 / game
16–64
FGM–FGA
6–27
3PM–3PA
12–31
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.3 / game
21
TOV
3.0 / game
0.76×
AST:TOV
20
FD
rebounding
30
REB
4.3 / game
2
OREB
28
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.1 / game
8
BLK
1.1 / game
19
PF
23
STL+BLK
3.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
24.1
HESI
33.8
PI
60.3
ORtg
75.8
DRtg
-15.5
NRtg
-11.5
Stable NRtg
75%
Stop%
29%
Floor%
30%
eFG%
1%
PIE
81.3
Team DRtg
+5.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5
Regional · 2026
#15/48view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.0
APG
1.0
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
64%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.0
P68
Playmaking
1.0
P48
Rebounding
2.0
P29
True shooting
64%
P99
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
60%
3 made / 5 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
1 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
Shot selection
60% of attempts from three
●2PA 2●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
7
PTS
7.0 / game
3–5
FGM–FGA
1–3
3PM–3PA
0–1
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
1.0 / game
1
TOV
1.0 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
2
REB
2.0 / game
1
OREB
1
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
2.0 / game
1
BLK
1.0 / game
1
PF
3
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
70%
eFG%
1%
PIE
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#146
#147
#149
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 5 · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
1
GP
7.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.0
APG
2.0
SPG
1.0
BPG
—
3P%
64%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #148
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.1
PPG
4.3
RPG
2.3
APG
3.0
TOV/G
0.9
3PM/G
32%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.1
P69
Playmaking
2.3
P77
Rebounding
4.3
P72
True shooting
32%
P26
Two-way impact
-15.5
P30
Stops
75%
P90
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
25%
16 made / 64 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
22%
6 made / 27 attempts
FT
Free throws
39%
12 made / 31 attempts
Shot selection
42% of attempts from three
●2PA 37●3PA 27
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
50
PTS
7.1 / game
16–64
FGM–FGA
6–27
3PM–3PA
12–31
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.3 / game
21
TOV
3.0 / game
0.76×
AST:TOV
20
FD
rebounding
30
REB
4.3 / game
2
OREB
28
DREB
4.3
REB/G
defense
15
STL
2.1 / game
8
BLK
1.1 / game
19
PF
23
STL+BLK
3.3 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
24.1
HESI
33.8
PI
60.3
ORtg
75.8
DRtg
-15.5
NRtg
-11.5
Stable NRtg
75%
Stop%
29%
Floor%
30%
eFG%
1%
PIE
81.3
Team DRtg
+5.5
Def. lift
FIBA U18 Women’s AfroBasket 2026 Qualifiers — Women — Zone 52026
1 GP · event rank #15
//quick_read
The line at a glance
7.0
PPG
2.0
RPG
1.0
APG
1.0
TOV/G
1.0
3PM/G
64%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
7.0
P68
Playmaking
1.0
P48
Rebounding
2.0
P29
True shooting
64%
P99
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
60%
3 made / 5 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
33%
1 made / 3 attempts
FT
Free throws
0%
0 made / 1 attempts
Shot selection
60% of attempts from three
●2PA 2●3PA 3
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
7
PTS
7.0 / game
3–5
FGM–FGA
1–3
3PM–3PA
0–1
FTM–FTA
creation
1
AST
1.0 / game
1
TOV
1.0 / game
1.00×
AST:TOV
—
FD
rebounding
2
REB
2.0 / game
1
OREB
1
DREB
2.0
REB/G
defense
2
STL
2.0 / game
1
BLK
1.0 / game
1
PF
3
STL+BLK
3.0 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
70%
eFG%
1%
PIE
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.