ORtg
71.2
35th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
MEX · b. 2010
//measurables
178 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
2.3 APGCreation · 77th event percentile
4.7 RPGRebounding · 76th event percentile
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #149 of 192 · Established
HESI
21.5
Event performance
22nd event percentile
PI
32.9
Prospect index
23rd event percentile
ORtg
71.2
Points / 100 poss.
35th event percentile
DRtg
90.3
Lower is better
22nd event percentile
NRtg
-19.1
Two-way margin
29th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 71.2 · 35th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 90.3 · Stop% 70.5% · Team DRtg 96.5
Sample context
7 games · 136 minutes · 69% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation and Rebounding are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
Rebounding
Questions for film
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
//impact_fingerprint
HESI performance
21.5
22nd event percentile
Prospect index
32.9
23rd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
71.2
35th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
90.3
22nd event percentile
Two-way margin
-19.1
29th event percentile
Stop percentage
70.5%
84th event percentile
//role_and_production
Scoring load
4.7 PPG
52nd event percentile
Creation
2.3 APG
77th event percentile
Rebounding
4.7 RPG
76th event percentile
Defensive activity
2.1 stocks
65th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
32.8% TS
28th event percentile
//reading_guide
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
HESI performance sits at the 22nd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 71.2 ORtg and 90.3 DRtg, producing a -19.1 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are defensive stops, creation, and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive efficiency, scoring efficiency, and two-way margin.
Defensive stops
70.5% Stop%
The estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player’s contribution is relatively strong.
Creation
2.3 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
Rebounding
4.7 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Defensive efficiency
90.3 DRtg
The player DRtg is less favorable relative to this event pool; matchup and team context still require film.
Scoring efficiency
32.8% TS
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Two-way margin
-19.1 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
ORtg
71.2
35th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
Points
4.7 PPG
52nd event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
32.8%
28th event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
29.8%
28th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
28.6%
34th event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
20.0%
context0.7 attempts per game
Free throws
42.1%
24th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
36.0%
41st event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.3 APG
77th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
90.3
22nd event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
96.5
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
+6.2
91st event percentilePlayer DRtg is lower than the team baseline.
Stop%
70.5%
84th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
2.1 STL+BLK
65th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
38.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-19.1
29th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-13.2
22nd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
21.5
22nd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
32.9
23rd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.6%
60th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.7 RPG
76th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
7
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
135.8
context19.4 minutes per game.
Sample weight
69.4%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#149
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
565.6
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
7
GP
4.7
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.3
APG
#149
RANK
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
//quick_read
4.7
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.3
APG
1.4
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.7
P52
Playmaking
2.3
P77
Rebounding
4.7
P76
True shooting
33%
P28
Two-way impact
-19.1
P29
Stops
70%
P84
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
29%
12 made / 42 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
42%
8 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
12% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
33
PTS
4.7 / game
12–42
FGM–FGA
1–5
3PM–3PA
8–19
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.3 / game
10
TOV
1.4 / game
1.60×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
33
REB
4.7 / game
13
OREB
20
DREB
4.7
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.0 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
14
PF
15
STL+BLK
2.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
21.5
HESI
32.9
PI
71.2
ORtg
90.3
DRtg
-19.1
NRtg
-13.2
Stable NRtg
70%
Stop%
36%
Floor%
30%
eFG%
4%
PIE
96.5
Team DRtg
+6.2
Def. lift
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
//current_rank
#149
of 192 ranked
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
7
GP
4.7
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.3
APG
2.0
SPG
0.1
BPG
20%
3P%
33%
TS%
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
7 GP · event rank #149
//quick_read
4.7
PPG
4.7
RPG
2.3
APG
1.4
TOV/G
0.1
3PM/G
33%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Scoring
4.7
P52
Playmaking
2.3
P77
Rebounding
4.7
P76
True shooting
33%
P28
Two-way impact
-19.1
P29
Stops
70%
P84
//shooting_profile
FG
Field goals
29%
12 made / 42 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
20%
1 made / 5 attempts
FT
Free throws
42%
8 made / 19 attempts
Shot selection
12% of attempts from three
//complete_box_score
scoring
33
PTS
4.7 / game
12–42
FGM–FGA
1–5
3PM–3PA
8–19
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.3 / game
10
TOV
1.4 / game
1.60×
AST:TOV
14
FD
rebounding
33
REB
4.7 / game
13
OREB
20
DREB
4.7
REB/G
defense
14
STL
2.0 / game
1
BLK
0.1 / game
14
PF
15
STL+BLK
2.1 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
21.5
HESI
32.9
PI
71.2
ORtg
90.3
DRtg
-19.1
NRtg
-13.2
Stable NRtg
70%
Stop%
36%
Floor%
30%
eFG%
4%
PIE
96.5
Team DRtg
+6.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.