ORtg
65.5
28th event percentileEstimated points produced per 100 possessions.
back_to_rankings
Unclaimed
event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026
Melanija Reicela Lagunovica
LAT · b. 2009
//measurables
176 cm
HEIGHT
//15_second_scouting_read
data-led profileCreation-led production
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
automated_event_signals
//event_signalShooter36% 3PT on 2.3 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.
2.7 APGCreation · 84th event percentile
50.8% TSScoring efficiency · 82nd event percentile
- 22.5
- HESI v2.1
- #150
- of 192
- 63%
- sample weight
Performance
1 rated event
Published event intelligence
Film
No public film
Movement and decisions remain unverified
Scouting
No final report
No human evaluation on file
Competition
1 event
Event context and history available
01
//performance_intelligence
Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.
//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence
HESI v2.1 performance dossier
Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
Rank #150 of 192 · Established
HESI
22.5
Event performance
23rd event percentile
PI
32.5
Prospect index
22nd event percentile
ORtg
65.5
Points / 100 poss.
28th event percentile
DRtg
86.1
Lower is better
40th event percentile
NRtg
-20.6
Two-way margin
28th event percentile
Offensive evidence
ORtg 65.5 · 28th event percentile
Defensive evidence
DRtg 86.1 · Stop% 55.9% · Team DRtg 84.9
Sample context
6 games · 102 minutes · 63% weight
//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade
Creation-led productionevent-relative description
Creation and Scoring efficiency are the clearest relative production signals in this event.
Creation
2.7 APG84th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
50.8% TS82nd event percentile
Questions for film
- 01
How stable is this profile over a larger game and minute sample?
- 02
Do the steals and blocks come from disciplined reads, physical tools, or higher-risk activity?
- 03
Can the scoring load hold as defensive attention and role responsibility increase?
Explore full efficiency + production profile
//impact_fingerprint
Where the profile separates
HESI performance
22.5
23rd event percentile
Prospect index
32.5
22nd event percentile
Offensive efficiency
65.5
28th event percentile
Defensive efficiency
86.1
40th event percentile
Two-way margin
-20.6
28th event percentile
Stop percentage
55.9%
49th event percentile
//role_and_production
How the production is shaped
Scoring load
3.7 PPG
40th event percentile
Creation
2.7 APG
84th event percentile
Rebounding
4.0 RPG
69th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.2 stocks
15th event percentile
Scoring efficiency
50.8% TS
82nd event percentile
How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings
//reading_guide
How to read the dossier
HESI
Stabilized event performance
A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.
PI
Prospect index
80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.
ORtg · DRtg · NRtg
Dean Oliver impact
Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.
Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.
event_signals
Automated Signals
The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.
Shooter
36% 3PT on 2.3 3PA/G
//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats
What the numbers suggest
HESI performance sits at the 23rd event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 65.5 ORtg and 86.1 DRtg, producing a -20.6 Net Rating. The clearest relative strengths are creation, scoring efficiency, and rebounding. The lowest relative areas are defensive activity, offensive efficiency, and two-way margin.
Relative strengths
- 84th event percentile
Creation
2.7 APG
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.
- 82nd event percentile
Scoring efficiency
50.8% TS
True shooting efficiency compares favorably with the published event pool.
- 69th event percentile
Rebounding
4.0 RPG
Rebounding production is a clear relative contribution within this event.
Relative weaknesses
- 15th event percentile
Defensive activity
0.2 steals + blocks/G
Recorded steals and blocks are a lower relative area; this does not measure positioning, containment, or communication.
- 28th event percentile
Offensive efficiency
65.5 ORtg
The Dean Oliver estimate places offensive production per 100 possessions below much of this event pool.
- 28th event percentile
Two-way margin
-20.6 NRtg
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
//complete_statistical_profile
Every verified signal in this event
Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.
Offense and scoring
Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.
Points
3.7 PPG
40th event percentileScoring volume per game.
True shooting
50.8%
82nd event percentileScoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.
Effective FG
50.0%
88th event percentileField-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.
Field goals
36.8%
61st event percentileOverall field-goal percentage.
Three-point shooting
35.7%
context2.3 attempts per game
Free throws
50.0%
35th event percentileFree-throw conversion in this event.
Floor%
27.2%
22nd event percentileEstimated share of possessions producing at least one point.
Assists
2.7 APG
84th event percentileRecorded passing production per game.
Defense and disruption
Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.
DRtg
86.1
40th event percentileEstimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.
Team DRtg
84.9
contextTeam defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.
Defensive lift
-1.2
61st event percentilePlayer DRtg is higher than the team baseline.
Stop%
55.9%
49th event percentileEstimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.
Recorded activity
0.2 STL+BLK
15th event percentileSteals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.
Estimated stops
22.7
contextDean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.
Two-way and all-around impact
Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.
Net Rating
-20.6
28th event percentileRaw ORtg minus DRtg.
Stabilized NRtg
-12.9
23rd event percentileNet Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.
HESI performance
22.5
23rd event percentileEvent-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.
Prospect index
32.5
22nd event percentileHESI performance with competition and age context.
PIE
3.9%
60th event percentileEstimated share of positive game events while on the floor.
Rebounds
4.0 RPG
69th event percentileTotal rebounding production per game.
Sample and confidence
How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.
Games
6
contextPublished games included in this event line.
Minutes
101.5
context16.9 minutes per game.
Sample weight
62.8%
contextHow strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.
Confidence
Established
contextModel confidence based on available games and minutes.
Event rank
#150
contextAmong 192 published players.
Team possessions
560.5
contextEstimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.
model_limits
- The available game and minute sample is still limited, so these relative findings may move.
- This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
- Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.
02
//competition_evidence
Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.
competition_context
Competition
Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.
//primary_competition · highest_stature
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
6
GP
3.7
PPG
4.0
RPG
2.7
APG
#150
RANK
competition_history
All competitions
Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup
World Cup · 2026
#150/192view →
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.7
PPG
4.0
RPG
2.7
APG
3.2
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.7
P40
Playmaking
2.7
P84
Rebounding
4.0
P69
True shooting
51%
P82
Two-way impact
-20.6
P28
Stops
56%
P49
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
37%
7 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
36%
5 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
74% of attempts from three
●2PA 5●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
22
PTS
3.7 / game
7–19
FGM–FGA
5–14
3PM–3PA
3–6
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.7 / game
19
TOV
3.2 / game
0.84×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
24
REB
4.0 / game
3
OREB
21
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
22.5
HESI
32.5
PI
65.5
ORtg
86.1
DRtg
-20.6
NRtg
-12.9
Stable NRtg
56%
Stop%
27%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
4%
PIE
84.9
Team DRtg
-1.2
Def. lift
around_this_rank
Around this rank
Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.
more_from_this_event
More from this event
Other ranked players from FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026.
#1
United States
11.0 PPG 5.9 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalShooter43% 3PT on 3.0 3PA/GComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.//event_signalDisruptor3.6 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#148
Egypt
7.1 PPG 4.3 RPG 2.3 APG
//event_signalDisruptor3.3 steals + blocks per gameComputed automatically from event data. Tap any signal to see the evidence behind it.#149
#151
03
//statistical_record
Complete event-specific production lines for auditing the read without flattening different competitions together.
key_stats
Key stats
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.
6
GP
3.7
PPG
4.0
RPG
2.7
APG
0.2
SPG
0.0
BPG
36%
3P%
51%
TS%
event_stats
Event production
Each line is scoped to one competition pool — not comparable across events.
FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026
6 GP · event rank #150
//quick_read
The line at a glance
3.7
PPG
4.0
RPG
2.7
APG
3.2
TOV/G
0.8
3PM/G
51%
TS%
//event_fingerprint
Performance against this field
Scoring
3.7
P40
Playmaking
2.7
P84
Rebounding
4.0
P69
True shooting
51%
P82
Two-way impact
-20.6
P28
Stops
56%
P49
//shooting_profile
Makes, attempts and efficiency
FG
Field goals
37%
7 made / 19 attempts
3PT
Three-pointers
36%
5 made / 14 attempts
FT
Free throws
50%
3 made / 6 attempts
Shot selection
74% of attempts from three
●2PA 5●3PA 14
//complete_box_score
Production by basketball action
scoring
22
PTS
3.7 / game
7–19
FGM–FGA
5–14
3PM–3PA
3–6
FTM–FTA
creation
16
AST
2.7 / game
19
TOV
3.2 / game
0.84×
AST:TOV
7
FD
rebounding
24
REB
4.0 / game
3
OREB
21
DREB
4.0
REB/G
defense
1
STL
0.2 / game
0
BLK
0.0 / game
4
PF
1
STL+BLK
0.2 / game
//hesi_and_dean_oliver
Efficiency and two-way impact
22.5
HESI
32.5
PI
65.5
ORtg
86.1
DRtg
-20.6
NRtg
-12.9
Stable NRtg
56%
Stop%
27%
Floor%
50%
eFG%
4%
PIE
84.9
Team DRtg
-1.2
Def. lift
04
//player_context
Biography, achievements, public identity, and profile ownership provide context without entering the performance rating.
player_context
The person behind the numbers
Background supplied by the athlete or verified profile source. Performance ratings remain separate from biography and achievements.
claim_this_profile
Is this you?
This profile was auto-generated from public tournament data. Claim it to connect your highlight reel, get scouted, and own your story on HESI.
data_source · fiba — statistics retain their original event attribution.