Hesi Sports Consulting//home_of_hesi_scout

Unclaimed

event_player · FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026

Lexi Wee

CAN · b. 2009

//measurables

166 cm

HEIGHT

//15_second_scouting_read

data-led profile

Creation-led production

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

2.9 APGCreation · 89th event percentile

4.1 PPGScoring load · 47th event percentile

35.1
HESI v2.1: #126
of 192: 68%
sample weight

Performance

1 rated event

Published event intelligence

Film

No public film

Movement and decisions remain unverified

Scouting

No final report

No human evaluation on file

Competition

1 event

Event context and history available

profile_index

//performance_intelligence

Event-scoped HESI impact, role, sample strength, team context, and the questions that still need film verification.

//athlete_dossier · event_intelligence

HESI v2.1 performance dossier

Event-scoped production and two-way impact. This is performance data—not a scout evaluation or universal OVR.

Open event intelligence

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup2026

Rank #126 of 192 · Established

HESI v2.1

HESI

35.1

Event performance

35th event percentile

42.6

Prospect index

35th event percentile

ORtg

75.0

Points / 100 poss.

39th event percentile

DRtg

85.7

Lower is better

42nd event percentile

NRtg

-10.7

Two-way margin

37th event percentile

Offensive evidence

ORtg 75.0 · 39th event percentile

Defensive evidence

DRtg 85.7 · Stop% 53.4% · Team DRtg 82.1

Sample context

7 games · 130 minutes · 68% weight

//statistical_read · not_a_scout_grade

Creation-led productionevent-relative description

Creation and Scoring load are the clearest relative production signals in this event.

Creation

2.9 APG89th event percentile

Scoring load

4.1 PPG47th event percentile

Questions for film

01
Which shot types and advantages are driving the efficiency profile?
02
Will the rebounding translate against larger and more physical competition?

Explore full efficiency + production profile

//impact_fingerprint

Where the profile separates

HESI performance

35.1

35th event percentile

Prospect index

42.6

35th event percentile

Offensive efficiency

75.0

39th event percentile

Defensive efficiency

85.7

42nd event percentile

Two-way margin

-10.7

37th event percentile

Stop percentage

53.4%

39th event percentile

//role_and_production

How the production is shaped

Scoring load

4.1 PPG

47th event percentile

Creation

2.9 APG

89th event percentile

Rebounding

2.4 RPG

39th event percentile

Defensive activity

0.9 stocks

39th event percentile

Scoring efficiency

33.6% TS

30th event percentile

How to read HESI, PI and Dean Oliver ratings

//reading_guide

How to read the dossier

HESI

Stabilized event performance

A 0–100 event-relative rank of stabilized Net Rating. Smaller samples are pulled toward neutral before players are ordered.

Prospect index

80% HESI performance, 12% competition context and 8% age context. It remains an event-scoped prospect index—not a universal ranking.

ORtg · DRtg · NRtg

Dean Oliver impact

Estimated points created and allowed per 100 possessions, plus their net difference. Lower DRtg is better.

Percentiles compare this athlete only with the published, trust-gated player pool from this event. Missing evidence stays blank and is never converted to zero.

event_signals

Automated Signals

The strongest patterns in this event sample, adjusted to the competition when event percentiles are available.

//automated_interpretation · dean_oliver + event_stats

What the numbers suggest

HESI performance sits at the 35th event percentile. The Dean Oliver profile estimates 75.0 ORtg and 85.7 DRtg, producing a -10.7 Net Rating. The clearest relative strength is creation. The lowest relative areas are scoring efficiency, two-way margin, and defensive stops.

Relative strengths

Creation
2.9 APG
89th event percentile
Assist production suggests a meaningful event-relative creation role; film must still separate advantage creation from connective passing.

Relative weaknesses

Scoring efficiency
33.6% TS
30th event percentile
True shooting efficiency is a lower relative area in the current event sample.
Two-way margin
-10.7 NRtg
37th event percentile
The current gap between estimated offensive and defensive efficiency trails much of this event pool.
Defensive stops
53.4% Stop%
39th event percentile
The estimated defensive-stop share is a lower relative area in the available sample.

//complete_statistical_profile

Every verified signal in this event

Percentile labels compare the player with the same published event pool. Context-only values are shown without inventing a rank.

Offense and scoring

Efficiency, scoring load, shooting shape and creation.

ORtg

75.0

39th event percentile

Estimated points produced per 100 possessions.

Points

4.1 PPG

47th event percentile

Scoring volume per game.

True shooting

33.6%

30th event percentile

Scoring efficiency including twos, threes and free throws.

Effective FG

25.7%

20th event percentile

Field-goal efficiency with extra credit for made threes.

Field goals

21.6%

18th event percentile

Overall field-goal percentage.

Three-point shooting

25.0%

context

1.7 attempts per game

Free throws

71.4%

70th event percentile

Free-throw conversion in this event.

Floor%

33.7%

35th event percentile

Estimated share of possessions producing at least one point.

Assists

2.9 APG

89th event percentile

Recorded passing production per game.

Defense and disruption

Estimated defensive efficiency, stops and recorded activity.

DRtg

85.7

42nd event percentile

Estimated points allowed per 100 possessions; lower is better.

Team DRtg

82.1

context

Team defensive baseline used by the Dean Oliver estimate.

Defensive lift

-3.5

36th event percentile

Player DRtg is higher than the team baseline.

Stop%

53.4%

39th event percentile

Estimated share of defensive possessions ended through the player.

Recorded activity

0.9 STL+BLK

39th event percentile

Steals plus blocks per game; it does not capture positioning or containment.

Estimated stops

26.8

context

Dean Oliver estimated defensive stops across the event sample.

Two-way and all-around impact

Net impact, stabilized performance and supporting production.

Net Rating

-10.7

37th event percentile

Raw ORtg minus DRtg.

Stabilized NRtg

-7.2

35th event percentile

Net Rating pulled toward the event median according to sample size.

HESI performance

35.1

35th event percentile

Event-relative rank of stabilized two-way performance.

Prospect index

42.6

35th event percentile

HESI performance with competition and age context.

PIE

2.5%

53rd event percentile

Estimated share of positive game events while on the floor.

Rebounds

2.4 RPG

39th event percentile

Total rebounding production per game.

Sample and confidence

How much evidence supports the estimates shown above.

Games

context

Published games included in this event line.

Minutes

130.1

context

18.6 minutes per game.

Sample weight

68.4%

context

How strongly the model trusts raw Net Rating versus the event median.

Confidence

Established

context

Model confidence based on available games and minutes.

Event rank

#126

context

Among 192 published players.

Team possessions

540.5

context

Estimated team possessions supporting the defensive context.

model_limits

This is an automated event-relative interpretation, not a scout evaluation or universal player grade.
Box scores cannot measure assignment difficulty, positioning, communication, decision quality, or off-ball value.

//competition_evidence

Where the production happened, how strong the event pool was, and every published competition supporting the profile.

competition_context

Competition

Primary competition is the highest-stature event. Best ranking evidence is the strongest event-relative finish — they may come from different events.

//primary_competition · highest_stature

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

4.1

PPG

2.4

RPG

2.9

APG

#126

RANK

competition_history

All competitions

Every published competition this player appeared in, strongest first, with its complete verified stat line.

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup

World Cup · 2026

#126/192view →

//quick_read

The line at a glance

4.1

PPG

2.4

RPG

2.9

APG

2.0

TOV/G

0.4

3PM/G

34%

TS%

//event_fingerprint

Performance against this field

Scoring

4.1

P47

Playmaking

2.9

P89

Rebounding

2.4

P39

True shooting

34%

P30

Two-way impact

-10.7

P37

Stops

53%

P39

//shooting_profile

Makes, attempts and efficiency

Field goals

22%

8 made / 37 attempts

3PT

Three-pointers

25%

3 made / 12 attempts

Free throws

71%

10 made / 14 attempts

Shot selection

32% of attempts from three

●2PA 25●3PA 12

//complete_box_score

Production by basketball action

scoring

PTS

4.1 / game

8–37

FGM–FGA

3–12

3PM–3PA

10–14

FTM–FTA

creation

AST

2.9 / game

TOV

2.0 / game

1.43×

AST:TOV

rebounding

REB

2.4 / game

OREB

DREB

2.4

REB/G

defense

STL

0.9 / game

BLK

0.0 / game

STL+BLK

0.9 / game

//hesi_and_dean_oliver

Efficiency and two-way impact

35.1

HESI

42.6

75.0

ORtg

85.7

DRtg

-10.7

NRtg

-7.2

Stable NRtg

53%

Stop%

34%

Floor%

26%

eFG%

PIE

82.1

Team DRtg

-3.5

Def. lift

around_this_rank

Around this rank

Event-scoped ranking within FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup 2026 — 192 ranked players.

rank_above · #125Ema BartosovaCZE

//current_rank

#126

of 192 ranked

rank_below · #127Dayra PedrozaCOL

more_from_this_event

Key stats

FIBA U17 Basketball World Cup · 2026 — scoped to this competition pool.

4.1

PPG

2.4

RPG

2.9

APG

0.9

SPG

0.0

BPG

25%

3P%

34%

TS%

event_stats